RESEARCH PAPER
The influence of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time on the fitness of elderly female breast cancer survivors – pilot study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
 
2
Department of Rehabilitation, Holycross Cancer Centre, Kielce, Poland
 
3
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Holycross Cancer Centre, Kielce, Poland
 
4
Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, Holycross Cancer Centre, Kielce, Poland
 
5
Department of Public Health, Academy of Medical Sciences of Applied and Holistic Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
 
6
Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Paulina Maria Kaczor-Szkodny   

Department of Epidemiology, Instytut Medycyny Wsi im. Witolda Chodźki, ul. Jaczewskiego 2, 20-090, Lublin, Poland
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Treatment for breast cancer is associated with numerous adverse effects that may impair functional fitness. The aim of the study is to assess physical fitness levels and examine the influence of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time on functional fitness among independently functioning breast cancer survivors (BCS) over the age of 60. The influence was assessed of the overall distribution of adiposity and adipose tissue on the level of fitness and physical activity.

Material and methods:
88 breast cancer survivors with an average age of 69 years were included in the study. Physical activity was measured using ActiGraph GT3X triaxial accelerometer. Senior Fitness Test (SFT) was used to assess functional fitness.

Results:
Time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was positively correlated with performance in SFT3, SFT4, SFT5 and SFT6 trials. Sitting time showed a negative correlation with SFT1, SFT3, SFT5 and SFT6 trial results. Objective measurements of PA indicated that participants primarily engaged in LPA, with an average of approximately 290 minutes per day. Average daily sitting time was 765 minutes.

Conclusions:
Breast cancer survivors often fail to meet the recommendations regarding physical fitness. The flexibility of the upper extremity, agility and balance were the most impaired components. Patients older than 60 years do not undertake vigorous physical activity. Improvements in functional fitness were seen in older patients who engaged in more physical activity or spent less time sitting.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitst... (accessed 04 May 2025).
 
2.
Thraen-Borowski K, Gennuso K, Cadmus-Bertram L, et al. Accelerometer-derived physical activity and sedentary time by cancer type in the United States. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
3.
Rikli R, Jones C. Functional fitness normative scores for community-residing older adults, ages 60–94. J Aging Phys Act. 1999;7(2):162–181. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.7....
 
4.
Spei ME, Samoli E, Bravi F, et al. Physical activity in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis on overall and breast cancer survival. Breast. 2019;44:144–152.
 
5.
World Health Organization. The challenge of obesity in the WHO European region and the strategies for response. 2007.
 
6.
Biskup M, Macek P, Terek-Derszniak M, et al. Agreement between Accelerometer-Assessed and Self-Reported Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Female Breast Cancer Survivors. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(22):3447. Published 2023 Nov 15. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13223447.
 
7.
Macek P, Biskup M, Terek-Derszniak M, et al. Competing Risks of Cancer and Non-Cancer Mortality When Accompanied by Lifestyle-Related Factors-A Prospective Cohort Study in Middle-Aged and Older Adults. Front Oncol. 2020;10:545078. Published 2020 Nov 30. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.545078.
 
8.
Świątkowska B, Szkiela M, Zajdel R, et al. Shift work, body mass index and associated breast cancer risks in postmenopausal women. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2023;30(4):699–704. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/....
 
9.
Martone A, Levati E, Ciciariello F, et al. Impact of waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios on physical performance: insights from the Longevity Check-up 8+ project. Aging (Albany NY). 2025;17(6):1375–1385. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging....
 
10.
Weiner L, Takemoto M, Godbole S, et al. Breast cancer survivors reduce accelerometer-measured sedentary time in an exercise intervention. J Cancer Surviv. 2019;13(3):468–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764....
 
11.
Jones C, Rikli R. Updated Senior Fitness Test Manual. 3rd ed. Human Kinetics; 2023.
 
12.
Romero-Elias M, Maximiano C, Cantos B, et al. Accelerometer measured physical activity and biomarkers in breast cancer survivors. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(8):1191–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anno....
 
13.
Papadopoulos E, Mina D. Can we HIIT cancer if we attack inflammation? Cancer Causes Control. 2018;29(1):7–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552....
 
14.
Maridaki M, Papadopetraki A, Karagianni H, et al. The assessment and relationship between quality of life and physical activity levels in Greek breast cancer female patients under chemotherapy. Sports. 2020;8(5):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports....
 
15.
Choi S, Park S, Lee K, et al. Age-related decline in physical activity and fitness: a population-based study. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:1749–1758. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S2....
 
16.
Silva M, Petrica J, Serrano J, et al. The sedentary time and physical activity levels on physical fitness in the elderly: a comparative cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3697. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
 
17.
Spartano N, Lyass A, Larson M, et al. Objective physical activity and physical performance in middle-aged and older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2019;119:203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exge....
 
18.
Park H, Park W, Lee M, et al. The association of locomotive and non-locomotive physical activity measured by an accelerometer with functional fitness in healthy elderly men: a pilot study. J Exerc Nutr Biochem. 2018;22(1):41–48. https://doi.org/10.20463/jenb.....
 
19.
Tomás M, Galán-Mercant A, Carnero E, et al. Functional capacity and levels of physical activity in aging: a 3-year follow-up. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;4:244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2....
 
20.
Izawa K, Shibata A, Ishii K, et al. Associations of low-intensity light physical activity with physical performance in community-dwelling elderly Japanese: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179180. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
 
21.
Riviati N, Indra B. Relationship between muscle mass and muscle strength with physical performance in older adults: a systematic review. SAGE Open Med. 2023;11:20503121231214650. https://doi.org/10.1177/205031....
 
22.
de Oliveira L, Wanderley R, de Medeiros M, et al. Health-related quality of life of institutionalized older adults: influence of physical, nutritional and self-perceived health status. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021;92:104278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arch....
 
23.
Freedson P, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777–781. https://doi.org/10.1097/000057....
 
24.
Mroczek A, Kaczorowska A, Kaczmarczyk M. Body structure and physical fitness assessed by the Senior Fitness Test: a cross-sectional study in a sample of Polish seniors. Med Sci Pulse. 2020;14(4):67–74. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.300....
 
25.
Biernat E, Tomaszewski P. Implementation of WHO recommendations on physical activity among Polish adults: trends and challenges. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(14):7421. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top