RESEARCH PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Measles is one of the most contagious human viruses and serves as an early indicator of gaps in population immunity. Despite the introduction of measles vaccination 50 years ago, Poland remains one of nine endemic countries in the WHO European Region. The aim of the study is to assess the relationship between socio-economic factors and sufficient coverage (≥95%) with the second dose of vaccination against measles (MMR2) at the poviat level in Poland from 2014 – 2018.

Material and methods:
Data on MMR2 coverage was extracted from annual reports collected by sanitary-epidemiological stations in Poland. Socio-economic data was obtained from Statistics Poland. A multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for population size and the number of physicians and nurses, was performed to identify predictors of sufficient MMR2 coverage.

Results:
Three socio-economic variables were found to be significant independent predictors of sufficient MMR2 coverage across years: the number of households receiving community-based social assistance, families receiving child benefits, and the number of medical consultations in primary health care. Poviats with higher values for these variables had increased odds of achieving sufficient MMR2 coverage. In contrast, no significant association was observed between MMR2 coverage and the average monthly salary, employment rates, or the number of foster families.

Conclusions:
MMR2 coverage at the poviat level in Poland is predictable using selected socio-economic variables. The findings suggest that benefitting from social assistance positively influences vaccination uptake. While individual-level data would provide greater insight, poviat-level data can still guide public health interventions to improve MMR2 coverage and reduce the risk of measles outbreaks.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Barakat C, Konstantinidis T. A Review of the Relationship between Socioeconomic Status Change and Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(13):6249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph... (access: 2024.08.25).
 
2.
World Health Organization (WHO). Constitution of the World Health Organization. 1946. https://apps.who.int/gb/bd/PDF... (access: 2025.02.20).
 
3.
Sim SY, Watts E, Constenla D, et al. Return On Investment From Immunization Against 10 Pathogens In 94 Low- And Middle-Income Countries, 2011–30. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39(8):1343–1353. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaf... (access: 2025.05.25).
 
4.
Watts E, Sim SY, Constenla D, et al. Economic Benefits of Immunization for 10 Pathogens in 94 Low- and Middle-Income Countries From 2011 to 2030 Using Cost-of-Illness and Value-of-Statistical-Life Approaches. Value Health. 2021 Jan;24(1):78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval....
 
5.
Pearce A, Henery P, Dundas R, et al. Socio-economic inequalities in uptake and timing of childhood vaccination: Taking a life course approach in an administrative cohort in Scotland. Vaccine. 2025;57:127222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacc... (access: 2025.05.25).
 
6.
Bryden GM, Browne M, Rockloff M, Unsworth C. The privilege paradox: geographic areas with highest socio-economic advantage have the lowest rates of vaccination. Vaccine. 2019;37(32):4525–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacc... (access: 2025.04.29).
 
7.
Bocquier A, Ward JK, Jocelyn Raude J, et al. Socioeconomic differences in childhood vaccination in developed countries: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16(11):1107–1118.
 
8.
Hungerford D, Macpherson P, Farmer S, et al. Effect of socioeconomic deprivation on uptake of measles, mumps and rubella vaccination in Liverpool, UK over 16 years: a longitudinal ecological study. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144(6):1201–1211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S09502... (access: 2025.05.27).
 
9.
Martínez-Marcos M, Reñé-Reñé A, Zabaleta-del-Olmo E, et al. Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination coverage: an ecological study of primary health care and socio-economic factors in Catalonia, Spain. J Public Health Pol. 2024;45:299–318. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271... (access: 2025.04.29).
 
10.
Varbanova V, Verelst F, Hens N, Beutels P. Determinants of basic childhood vaccination coverage in European and OECD countries. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(6):2123883. https://doi.org/10.1080/216455... (access: 2025.05.26).
 
11.
Novilla MLB, Goates MC, Redelfs AH, et al. Why Parents Say No to Having Their Children Vaccinated against Measles: A Systematic Review of the Social Determinants of Parental Perceptions on MMR Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccines. 2023;11(5):926. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccin... (access: 2025.02.20).
 
12.
Avis K, Tan L, Anderson C, et al. Taking a closer look: an examination of measles, mumps, and rubella immunization uptake in Saskatoon. Can J Public Health. 2007;98(5):417–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0340... (access: 2025.02.20).
 
13.
World Health Organization (WHO). Measles. Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. Surveillance Standards. 2018. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs... (access: 08.18).
 
14.
World Health Organization (WHO). European Immunization Agenda 2030.https://www.who.int/europe/pub... (access: 2024.08.18).
 
15.
Janaszek W. Wpływ szczepień ochronnych na sytuację epidemiologiczną odry w Polsce. Przegl Epidemiol. 1998;52(4):413–425.
 
16.
Zakład Epidemiologii Chorób Zakaźnych i Nadzoru NIZP PZH – PIB, Departament Zapobiegania i Kontroli Chorób Zakaźnych GIS. Zachorowania na wybrane choroby zakaźne w Polsce od 1 stycznia do 15 kwietnia 2025 r. oraz w porównywalnym okresie 2024 r. https://wwwold.pzh.gov.pl/oldp... (access: 2025.04.29).
 
17.
World Health Organization (WHO), Regional Office for Europe. Twelfth meeting of the European Regional Verification Commission for Measles and Rubella Elimination. 8–11 September 2023. Copenhagen, Denmark. https://iris.who.int/bitstream... (access: 2024.08.21).
 
18.
Zimmerman LA, Muscat M, Singh S, et al. Progress Toward Measles Elimination – European Region, 2009–2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68:396–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmw... (access: 2025.04.29).
 
19.
Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 19 December 2017 on the statistical research program of public statistics for 2018. Journal of Laws 2017. item 2471.
 
20.
Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Pojęcia stosowane w statystyce publicznej. https://stat.gov.pl/metainform... (access: 2024.08.18).
 
21.
Dz.Urz.MZ 2018, nr poz. 104.
 
22.
Forshaw J, Gerver SM, Gill M, et al. The global effect of maternal education on complete childhood vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):801. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879... (access: 2025.05.27).
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top