RESEARCH PAPER
Figure from article: Public support for a Law on...
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Holding multiple jobs in the health system by a single healthcare professional is commonly defined as a physician dual practice (PDP). The aim of the study is to assess social attitudes towards the introduction of legal regulations regarding the employment of medical doctors in the public or private healthcare system in Poland, along with identifying factors related to opinions on the number of workplaces for doctors.

Material and methods:
A nationwide cross-sectional survey with computer-assisted web interviews was carried out in August 2025 among 1,162 adults aged 18–96 years. A self-prepared questionnaire was used.

Results:
Among the respondents (n=1162), 39.8% declared that they had heard that a public debate is currently taking place in Poland regarding PDP. Support for the introduction of regulations on physician dual practice was declared by 43.4% of respondents (20.2% ‘rather support’ and 23.2% ‘strongly support’). Among the respondents, 55.1% declared support (32.0% rather support and 23.1% strongly support) for the idea of offering higher remuneration to medical doctors who choose to work exclusively at a single medical facility. A total of 38.9% of respondents believed that regulation on PDP will lead to improved quality of care and increased accessibility of medical services. Male gender (aOR:1.97; 95%CI:1.53–2.53; p<0.001), age 60 years and over (aOR:1.68; 95%CI:1.06–2.66; p=0.03), secondary education (aOR:1.33; 95%CI:1.02–1.73; p=0.03), and living in cities from 20,000 to 99,999 residents (aOR:1.60; 95%CI:1.04–2.46; p=0.04) were significantly associated with higher public support for a law on physician dual practice.

Conclusions:
The study showed a low level of public awareness and support for new legal regulations on the organization of the healthcare system in Poland, and restrictions on physician dual practice.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
World Health Organization (WHO). Governance of dual practice in the public and private health sectors. Accesses Aug 12, 2025. Available online: https://www.who.int/publicatio....
 
2.
Russo G, Fronteira I, Jesus TS, et al. Understanding nurses’ dual practice: a scoping review of what we know and what we still need to ask on nurses holding multiple jobs. Hum Resour Health. 2018;16(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960....
 
3.
Hoogland R, Hoogland L, Handayani K, et al. Global Problem of Physician Dual Practices: A Literature Review. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51(7):1444–1460. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.....
 
4.
García-Prado A, González P. Policy and regulatory responses to dual practice in the health sector. Health Policy. 2007;84(2–3):142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heal....
 
5.
Moghri J, Arab M, Rashidian A, et al. Physician Dual Practice: A Descriptive Mapping Review of Literature. Iran J Public Health. 2016;45(3):278–288.
 
6.
González P, Macho-Stadler I. A theoretical approach to dual practice regulations in the health sector. J Health Econ. 2013;32(1):66–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhea....
 
7.
Hipgrave DB, Hort K. Dual practice by doctors working in South and East Asia: a review of its origins, scope and impact, and the options for regulation. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29(6):703–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol....
 
8.
Garattini L, Padula A. Dual practice of hospital staff doctors: hippocratic or hypocritic? J R Soc Med. 2018;111(8):265–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107....
 
9.
Whyle EB. Health system reform and path-dependency: how ideas and institutions shape health policy. Int Rev Adm Sci. 2024;90(1):67–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077....
 
10.
Miotto BA, Guilloux AGA, Cassenote AJF, et al. Physician’s socio-demographic profile and distribution across public and private health care: an insight into physicians’ dual practice in Brazil. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):299. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913....
 
11.
Howse E, Cullerton K, Grunseit A, et al. Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022;20(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961....
 
12.
Kreuter MW, Thompson T, McQueen A, et al. Addressing Social Needs in Health Care Settings: Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities for Public Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021;42:329–344. https://doi.org/10.1146/annure....
 
13.
Nationwide Research Panel Ariadna. Accesses Aug 12, 2025. Available online: https://panelariadna.com/.
 
14.
Central Statistical Office. Demographic Yearbook of Poland 2024. Accesses Aug 12, 2025. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/....
 
15.
Lewandowska A, Silczuk A, Mularczyk-Tomczewska P, et al. Awareness of mental disorders and their risk factors – a nationwide cross-sectional survey among adults in Poland. Front Psychiatry. 2025;16:1599683. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.....
 
16.
Chen H, Li M, Dai Z, et al. Factors influencing the perception of medical staff and outpatients of dual practice in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1667–1678. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S1....
 
17.
Kasekamp K, Habicht T, Võrk A, et al. Estonia: Health System Review. Health Syst Transit. 2023;25(5):1–236.
 
18.
Koussa EM, Atun R, Bowser D, et al. Factors influencing physicians’ choice of workplace: systematic review of drivers of attrition and policy interventions to address them. J Glob Health. 2016;6(2):020403. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.0....
 
19.
Ferreira T, Collins AM. The NHS Long Term Workforce Plan: an ambitious leap or a misstep? J R Soc Med. 2023;116(11):368–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107....
 
20.
Zgliczynski WS, Jankowski M, Rostkowska O, et al. Public and private health care services in the opinion of physicians in Poland. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020;33(2):195–214. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijome....
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top