RESEARCH PAPER
Factors associated with not visiting doctors and not performing diagnostic tests in a nationally
representative survey of adults aged 18–64 years in Poland – a secondary data analysis
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw, Poland
2
School of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
3
Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards, Allergology and Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Corresponding author
Mateusz Jankowski
School of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Kleczewska 61/63, 01-826, Warsaw, Poland
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
In Poland, the health system, which is based on mandatory health insurance, provides universal access to health services. The aim of the study is to identify factors associated with not visiting doctors and not performing diagnostic tests in the last 12 months among a representative sample of Poles aged 18–64.
Material and methods:
The study is a secondary analysis of data from a public opinion survey on social attitudes and behaviours towards health prevention (December 2024) in a representative nationwide sample of 5,006 individuals aged 18–64 in Poland.
Results:
In the analyzed population (n=5,006), 22.4% had not visited a doctor of any specialty (excluding dentists) in the past 12 months, and 19% had not undergone any diagnostic tests during that period. The most common reasons for not visiting doctors were: no perceived need (66.8%), reluctance or fear (12.1%), and excessively long waiting times (10.4%). Men (AOR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.35–1.83; p < 0.001), individuals without higher education (p < 0.05), those without chronic diseases (p < 0.05), people aged 35–44 years (AOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.00–1.50; p < 0.05), those who were single or in informal relationships (p < 0.05), individuals without full-time employment (p < 0.05), and those living in very poor economic conditions (AOR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.09–1.92; p < 0.05) were more likely to have avoided visiting doctors in the past 12 months. The same variables were associated with not undergoing diagnostic tests during the same period (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Gender, age, chronic disease, educational attainment, marital status, economic status and employment conditions are key determinants for not visiting doctors, and not performing diagnostic tests.
FUNDING
This study was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Poland (grant No. MEiN/2023/DPI/2717 of 13/10/2023 entitled “National Centre for Health Policy and Research on Health Inequalities of the Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw (ID 1013339)”).
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Ranabhat CL, Acharya SP, Adhikari C, et al. Universal health coverage evolution, ongoing trend, and future challenge: A conceptual and historical policy review. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1041459.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.....
2.
Walker C, Peterson CL. Universal health coverage and primary health care: Their place in people’s health. J Eval Clin Pract. 2021;27(5):1027–1032.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13....
4.
Sagan A, Panteli D, Borkowski W, et al. Poland health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(8):1–193.
5.
Smarżewska D, Wereda WS, Jończyk JA. Assessment of the health care system in Poland and other OECD countries using the Hellwig method. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(24):16733.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph....
6.
Republic of Poland. Act of 27 August 2004 on healthcare services financed from public funds. Available from:
https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.... (accessed on 17 April 2025).
7.
Pantyley V. Health inequalities among rural and urban population of Eastern Poland in the context of sustainable development. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24(3):477–483.
https://doi.org/10.5604/123219....
8.
Chelak K, Chakole S. The role of social determinants of health in promoting health equality: A narrative review. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e33425.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus....
9.
Mularczyk-Tomczewska P, Żarnowski A, Gujski M, et al. Barriers to accessing health services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland: A nationwide cross-sectional survey among 109,928 adults in Poland. Front Public Health. 2022;10:986996.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.....
12.
Grudziąż-Sękowska J, Sękowski KB, Pinkas J, et al. Blood glucose level testing in Poland – do socio-economic factors influence its frequency? A nationwide cross-sectional survey. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2023;30(3):483–489.
https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/....
13.
Versluis A, Schnoor K, Chavannes NH, et al. Direct access for patients to diagnostic testing and results using eHealth: Systematic review on eHealth and diagnostics. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(1):e29303.
https://doi.org/10.2196/29303.
14.
Mrożek-Gąsiorowska M, Tambor M. How COVID-19 has changed the utilization of different health care services in Poland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):105.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913....
15.
Ahmadi-Abhari S, Bandosz P, Shipley MJ, et al. Direct and indirect impacts of the COVID- pandemic on life expectancy and person-years of life lost with and without disability: A systematic analysis for 18 European countries, 2020–2022. PLoS Med. 2025;22(3):e1004541.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
16.
Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36(1):1–10.
19.
Laskowska I. Availability of health services vs. health condition of residents of rural areas in Poland – Analysis performed on the basis of EHIS 2009. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(4):700–3.
https://doi.org/10.5604/123219....
20.
The National Centre for Health Policy and Health Inequalities of the Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Poland. Research report: Health prevention and health inequalities. Warsaw; 2025.
https://doi.org/10.21697/10133....
22.
Connor L, Dean J, McNett M, et al. Evidence-based practice improves patient outcomes and healthcare system return on investment: Findings from a scoping review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2023;20(1):6–15.
https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12....
23.
Kröger H, Pakpahan E, Hoffmann R. What causes health inequality? A systematic review on the relative importance of social causation and health selection. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(6):951–960.
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub....
24.
Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, et al. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(2):147–152.
25.
Davis JL, Buchanan KL, Katz RV, et al. Gender differences in cancer screening beliefs, behaviors, and willingness to participate: Implications for health promotion. Am J Mens Health. 2012;6(3):211–217.
https://doi.org/10.1177/155798....
26.
Chang AY, Skirbekk VF, Tyrovolas S, et al. Measuring population ageing: An analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(3):e159-e167.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-....
27.
van der Heide I, Wang J, Droomers M, et al. The relationship between health, education, and health literacy: Results from the Dutch Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey. J Health Commun. 2013;18(Suppl 1):172–184.
https://doi.org/10.1080/108107....
28.
Lamsal R, Napit K, Rosen AB, Wilson FA. Paid sick leave and healthcare utilization in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2021;60(6):856–865.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amep....
29.
Wagenschieber E, Blunck D. Impact of reimbursement systems on patient care: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Econ Rev. 2024;14(1):22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561....
30.
Mortensen K, Dean EB, French MT, et al. Trends in health care utilization and expenditures in the United States across 5 decades: 1977–2017. Med Care. 2021;59(8):704–710.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.00....