RESEARCH PAPER
Figure from article: Longitudinal analysis of...
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Vaccine hesitancy is dynamic, with longitudinal evidence beyond two waves scarce. The aim of the study is to characterise, across a four-wave Polish panel (2021–2025), how stated vaccination intentions translate into actual vaccination, and to identify modifiable determinants of persistent non-vaccination versus delayed conversion.

Material and methods:
4,205 wave records from 2,559 unique Polish adults (Rise or Fall [ROF] panel, 2021/2022/2024/2025) were harmonised. The analytical cohort (n=859, ≥2 waves) was classified into five trajectory classes: Baseline vaccinated, Early convert, Late convert, Persistent unvax willing (PuW), and Persistent unvax hesitant (PuH; reference). Predictors were identified by Multinomial logistic regression and discrete-time hazard models.

Results:
By 2025, 83.4% of baseline-willing respondents were vaccinated vs. 38.9% of baseline-hesitant – a 44.5-percentage-point gap nearly identical to 2022 (45.7 pp). Persistent non-vaccination tracked higher fear of side-effects (hazard OR=0.63 per point; p<0.001) and conspiracy beliefs (OR=0.79; p<0.001); a Bachelor’s degree raised the conversion hazard 2.6-fold (p<0.001). Low fear emerged as a strong predictor of Baseline vaccinated (OR=6.0) and Early convert (OR=3.0). PuW had the highest mean HLS-Q12 (3.04; omnibus p=0.040), with a borderline multinomial association (OR=1.56; p=0.077); HLS-Q12 robustly predicted lower vaccination hazard (OR=0.58; p=0.001).

Conclusions:
Vaccine hesitancy in Poland is durable; the willing/hesitant behavioural gap persists. Post-rollout strategy should combine safety-centred dialogue targetting fear of side-effects with structural facilitators for the willing-but-unvaccinated subgroup.
FUNDING
The Rise or Fall (ROF) project was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland (OPUS-19 grant no. 2020/37/B/NZ7/03380). The funder had no role in study design or in the decision to submit for publication. The article processing charge (APC) for open-access publication was covered by the Minister of Science under the “Regional Initiative of Excellence” (RID) programme (agreement no. RID/SP/0043/2024/01).
ETHICAL APPROVAL
The study was approved by the Bioethical Committee of the Medical University of Bialystok (approval no. APK.002.346.2020). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
MacDonald NE. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015;33(34):4161–4.
 
2.
World Health Organization. Understanding the behavioural and social drivers of vaccine uptake – WHO position paper, May 2022. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2022;97:209–24.
 
3.
Betsch C, Schmid P, Heinemeier D, et al. Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(12):e0208601.
 
4.
Lièvre G, Sicsic J, Galmiche S, et al. Are the 7C psychological antecedents associated with COVID-19 vaccine behaviours beyond intentions? Vaccine. 2024;42(14):3288–99.
 
5.
Oudin Doglioni D, Gagneux-Brunon A, Gauchet A, et al. Psychometric validation of a 7C-model of antecedents of vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers, parents and adolescents in France. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):19895.
 
6.
Kisa A, Kisa S. Health conspiracy theories: a scoping review of drivers, impacts, and countermeasures. Int J Equity Health. 2025;24(1):93.
 
7.
Simione L, Vagni M, Maiorano T, et al. Paranoia affected COVID-19 vaccine refusal by increasing beliefs in conspiracy theories and mistrust of science. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1718763.
 
8.
Larson HJ, Clarke RM, Jarrett C, et al. Measuring trust in vaccination: A systematic review. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(7):1599–1609.
 
9.
Ministerstwo Zdrowia. Raport szczepień przeciwko COVID-19 w Polsce. Available at: https://www.gov.pl/web/szczepi... (accessed 24 Oct 2023).
 
10.
Pizzato M, Gerli AG, La Vecchia C, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on total excess mortality and geographic disparities in Europe, 2020–2023. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024;44:100996.
 
11.
Wróblewski M, Bartnicki M, Stankowska J, et al. Sukces czy porażka? Społeczna ewaluacja Narodowego Programu Szczepień przeciwko COVID-19. Warszawa: Łukasiewicz-ORGMASZ; 2022.
 
12.
Schernhammer E, Weitzer J, Laubichler MD, et al. Correlates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Austria: trust and the government. J Public Health. 2022;44(1):e106–16.
 
13.
Loomba S, De Figueiredo A, Piatek SJ, et al. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(3):337–48.
 
14.
Lazarus JV, Wyka K, White TM, et al. Revisiting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy around the world using data from 23 countries in 2021. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3801.
 
15.
Lazarus JV, Wyka K, White TM, et al. A survey of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance across 23 countries in 2022. Nat Med. 2023;29(2):366–75.
 
16.
Sabat I, Neumann-Böhme S, Barros PP, et al. Vaccine hesitancy comes in waves: Longitudinal evidence on willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 from seven European countries. Vaccine. 2023;41(36):5304–12.
 
17.
Phillips R, Gillespie D, Hallingberg B, et al. Perceived threat of COVID-19, attitudes towards vaccination, and vaccine hesitancy: A prospective longitudinal study in the UK. Br J Health Psychol. 2022;27(4):1354–81.
 
18.
Oleksy T, Wnuk A, Gambin M, et al. Barriers and facilitators of willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19: A four-wave longitudinal study. Pers Individ Dif. 2022;190:111524.
 
19.
Sowa P, Kiszkiel Ł, Laskowski PP, et al. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Poland – Multifactorial Impact Trajectories. Vaccines. 2021;9(8):876.
 
20.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation; 2024.
 
21.
Dai J, Xie Y, Wang Y, et al. Profiles of Hesitancy Toward the Herpes Zoster Vaccine Among Older Adults in China: A Latent Profile Analysis. Vaccines. 2026;14(4):331.
 
22.
Gwadz M, Robinson JA, Serrano FGB, et al. Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccination Among Unvaccinated and Under-Vaccinated African American/Black and Latine Frontline Essential Workers: A Qualitative Exploration. AIDS Behav. 2025;29(8):2461–82.
 
23.
Vasiliadis S, Cook J, Nissan K, et al. Vaccine misinformation among Arabic-speakers in Australia and the audience and appetite for a game-based intervention. Vaccine. 2025;62:127599.
 
24.
Raciborski F, Tomaszewska A, Rakocy K, et al. The multidimensional nature of attitudes towards preventive vaccinations – a cross-sectional survey among Poles aged 15–39 years. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2023;36(2):214–28.
 
25.
Młoźniak I, Zwierczyk U, Rzepecka E, et al. Manifestation of Health Denialism in Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination: A Qualitative Study. Vaccines. 2023;11(12):1822.
 
26.
Chlabicz M, Nabożny A, Koszelew J, et al. Medical Misinformation in Polish on the World Wide Web During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: Infodemiology Study. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e48130.
 
27.
Bayrak F, Kayatepe E, Özman N, et al. Can reflection mitigate COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy beliefs and hesitancy? Psychol Health. 2025;1–32.
 
28.
Yang L, Xing C, Yu X, et al. Coverage of HPV Vaccination and Influencing Factors Among Female College Students in Northern China. Vaccines. 2025;13(6):598.
 
29.
Rahbeni TA, Satapathy P, Itumalla R, et al. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024;10:e54769.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top