RESEARCH PAPER
Screen time, preventive visual hygiene behaviours , and digital eye strain symptoms among adults in Poland – a cross-sectional study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw, Poland
 
2
National Centre for Health Policy and Health Inequalities, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw, Poland
 
3
Department of Ophthalmology, Azerbaijan Medical University, Azerbaijan
 
4
Faculty of Medicine, Łazarski University, Warsaw, Poland
 
5
VIZJA University, Warsaw, Poland
 
6
School of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
 
7
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Radosław Sierpiński   

Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum,, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw, Poland
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Digital eye strain (DES) comprises ocular and visual symptoms linked to prolonged use of digital devices. The aim of the study is to assess screen exposure, preventive visual hygiene behaviours, DES-related symptoms, and factors associated with preventive practices among adults in Poland.

Material and methods:
A cross-sectional CAWI survey was conducted in March 2026 among a nationwide quota sample of adults in Poland. Data were collected using the Computer-Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) technique.

Results:
A total of 1,090 adults participated. More than half reported at least 3 h of daily screen time on a typical working day, while 27.7% used no preventive visual hygiene behaviours. Regular breaks were reported by 31.9% and proper room lighting by 36.1%. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, higher education (aOR: 1.87; 95%CI: 1.38–2.54; p<0.001), occupational activity (aOR: 1.60; 95%CI: 1.16–2.19; p=0.004), wearing spectacles or contact lenses (aOR: 2.11; 95%CI: 1.54–2.88; p<0.001), diagnosed eye conditions (aOR: 2.08; 95%CI: 1.47–2.93; p<0.001), and longer screen exposure (p<0.05), were independently associated with using at least one preventive behaviour. About one-quarter frequently reported burning or irritated eyes (24.9%), tearing (24.6%), blurred vision (25.3%), and difficulty maintaining visual focus (24.1%). DES-related symptoms differed by gender, age, occupational status, vision correction, diagnosed eye conditions, and screen exposure (p<0.05).

Conclusions:
Daily screen exposure and DES-related symptoms were common among adults in Poland, while preventive visual hygiene behaviours were insufficiently implemented. Public health interventions are needed to promote evidence-based visual hygiene and reduce discomfort related to prolonged use of digital devices.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Akinjide A, Adejumo A, Akinola O, et al. Knowledge, awareness and preventive practices against computer vision syndrome among digital device users. World J Adv Res Rev. 2023;20(3):1523–1531. doi:10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.3.2541.
 
2.
AlNamlah L, Konswa AA, Alakeel R, Taieb H. The impact of advanced technology and social media platforms on lifestyle medicine: a narrative review. Discover Public Health. 2026;23:227. doi:10.1186/s12982-026-01479-z.
 
3.
Uslu O. Understanding digital wellbeing: impacts, strategies, and the path to healthier technology practices. Discov Soc Sci Health. 2025;5:145. doi:10.1007/s44155-025-00259-5.
 
4.
Elisabetta C, Paola R, Acquadro Maran D, et al. Remote workers’ life quality and stress during COVID-19: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2025 Feb 1;35(1):141–152. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae167. Erratum in: Eur J Public Health. 2025;35(6):1326. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf169.
 
5.
McPhail R, Chan XW, May R, Wilkinson A. Post-COVID remote working and its impact on people, productivity, and the planet: an exploratory scoping review. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2024;35(1):154–182. doi:10.1080/09585192.2023.2221385.
 
6.
de Barros EC. Understanding the influence of digital technology on human cognitive functions: A narrative review. IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2024;17:415–422. doi:10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.11.006.
 
7.
Ellis Sandoval N, Peña Martinez MI, Fernandez Cea AB, Hernandez Rincon EH. Effects on Prolonged Screen Time on Postural Health and Visual Health in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review. Orthop Res Rev. 2025;17:553–562. doi:10.2147/ORR.S519541.
 
8.
Pucker AD, Kerr AM, Sanderson J, Lievens C. Digital Eye Strain: Updated Perspectives. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2024;16:233–246. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S412382.
 
9.
Sheppard AL, Wolffsohn JS. Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement and amelioration. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2018;3(1):e000146. doi:10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000146.
 
10.
Kaur K, Gurnani B, Nayak S, et al. Digital Eye Strain- A Comprehensive Review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11(5):1655–1680. doi:10.1007/s40123-022-00540-9.
 
11.
Lema AK, Anbesu EW. Computer vision syndrome and its determinants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10:20503121221142402. doi:10.1177/20503121221142402.
 
12.
Alqurashi A, Almaghrabi H, Alahmadi M, et al. The severity of dry eye symptoms and risk factors among university students in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):15149. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-65297-6.
 
13.
Mataftsi A, Seliniotaki AK, Moutzouri S, et al. Digital eye strain in young screen users: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2023;170:107493. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107493.
 
14.
OECD. Poland economic snapshot. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2025. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics... (Accessed: 27 May 2026).
 
15.
Statistics Poland. Information society in Poland in 2024. Warsaw: Statistics Poland; 2024. Available from: https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/... (Accessed: 27 May 2026).
 
16.
Lewandowska A, Jankowski M, Gujski M, et al. Rural-urban differences in the perception of cooperation between schools and the psychiatric care system for children and adolescents, and attitudes towards the ban on using phones at school – a cross-sectional study. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2026;33(1):75–81. doi:10.26444/aaem/207723.
 
17.
GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e144-e160. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7.
 
18.
Nationwide Research Panel Ariadna. About us. Available from: https://panelariadna.com/ (Accessed: 27 May 2026).
 
19.
Statistics Poland. Demographic Yearbook of Poland 2025. Available from: https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/... (Accessed: 27 May 2026).
 
20.
Olearczyk A, Sękowski K, Jankowski M, et al. Prevalence and drivers of missed healthcare appointments in Poland: insights from a 2025 survey. Med Sci Monit. (2026) 32:e951944. doi:10.12659/MSM.951944.
 
21.
Olearczyk A, Sękowski K, Jankowski M, et al. Employee expectations towards employer-provided workplace health promotion and mental health support: a 2025 cross-sectional survey. Front Public Health. (2026) 14:1806781. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1806781.
 
22.
Mowatt L, Gordon C, Santosh ABR, Jones T. Computer vision syndrome and ergonomic practices among undergraduate university students. Int J Clin Pract. 2018;72(1). doi:10.1111/ijcp.13035.
 
23.
Alabdulkader B. Effect of digital device use during COVID-19 on digital eye strain. Clin Exp Optom. 2021;104(6):698–704. doi:10.1080/08164622.2021.1878843.
 
24.
Cantó-Sancho N, Sánchez-Zuriaga D, García-Medina JJ. Prevalence and risk factors of computer vision syndrome. PeerJ. 2023;11:e14937. doi:10.7717/peerj.14937.
 
25.
Matossian C, McDonald M, Donaldson KE, et al. Dry Eye Disease: Consideration for Women’s Health. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019;28(4):502–514. doi:10.1089/jwh.2018.7041.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top