RESEARCH PAPER
Determining gender differences in adolescent physical activity levels using IPAQ long form and pedometers
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
2
Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Jana Vašíčková   

Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(4):749–755
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The need to overcome gender differences in physical activity (PA) is an essential part of health and education policy. Adolescent girls display less PA than boys. The aim of the presented research was to determine whether 4-week monitoring with pedometers can influence differences between the level of PA amongst adolescent girls and boys. Four-week interventions using pedometers, motivational brochures and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), long version, and the possibility of using an Internet programme were carried out at 14 randomly selected schools. In total, 275 girls (15.8±0.9 years) and 220 boys (15.8±0.8 years) participated in the study, which was divided into intervention and control groups. The IPAQ questionnaire was applied in the pre-test as part of the ANEWS questionnaire. The IPAQ was solely used in the post-test. Significant differences in average daily steps were not observed in the intervention group for girls and boys (F=3.79; p<05; ω2 =.011), nor were differences in girls’ average number of steps in school vs. weekend days observed (p=.82). The lowest amount of PA in boys was observed on Sunday (n=10,390±3,728 steps•day-1), while overall, boys had a larger amount of steps on school days than at weekends (p<01). In contrast, girls walked more during the week following the intervention. The four-week intervention eliminated the difference in the overall PA of adolescent girls and boys, together with the difference between school and weekends among girls. The use of pedometers, motivational recording brochures and an Internet programme for maintaining PA for a longer period, supported the continuance for movement of an active and healthy lifestyle among girls significantly more than their use among boys.
 
REFERENCES (58)
1.
Gavarry O, Giacomoni M, Bernard T, Seymat M, Falgairette G. Habitual physical activity in children and adolescents during school and free days. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(3): 525–31.
 
2.
Norman GJ, Nutter SK, Ryan S, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ, Patrick K. Community design and access to recreational facilities as correlates of adolescent physical activity and Body-Mass Index. J Phys Act Health. 2006; 3(Suppl 1): S118-S28.
 
3.
Pearson N, Atkin A, Biddle S, Gorely T, Edwardson C. Patterns of adolescent physical activity and dietary behaviours. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6(1): 45.
 
4.
Sanchez A, Norman GJ, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ, Cella J, Patrick K. Patterns and correlates of physical activity and nutrition behaviors in adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 32(2): 124–30.
 
5.
Garcia AW, Pender NJ, Antonakos CL, Ronis DL. Changes in physical activity beliefs and behaviors of boys and girls across the transition to junior high school. J Adolesc Health. 1998; 22(5): 394–402.
 
6.
Bergier J, Kapka-Skrzypczak L, Bilinski P, Paprzycki P, Wojtyla A. Physical activity of Polish adolescents and young adults according to IPAQ: a population based study. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(1): 109–15.
 
7.
Frömel K, Chmelík F, Bláha L, Feltlová D, Fojtík I, Horák S et al. Pohybová aktivita české mládeže: Koreláty intenzivní pohybové aktivity (Physical activity in youth in the Czech Republic: Correlates of vigorous physical activity) [in Czech]. Ces Kin. 2007; 11(4): 49–55.
 
8.
Flohr JA, Todd MK, Tudor-Locke CE. Pedometer-assessed physical activity in young adolescents. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2006; 77(3): 309–15.
 
9.
Tudor-Locke CE, Lee SM, Morgan CF, Beighle A, Pangrazi RP. Children’s pedometer-determined physical activity during the segmented school day. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(10): 1732–8.
 
10.
Jago R, Anderson CB, Baranowski T, Watson K. Adolescent patterns of physical activity: Differences by gender, day, and time of day. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28(5): 447–52.
 
11.
Harris J, Penney D. Gender, health and physical education. In: Penney D. Gender and physical education: Contemporary issues and future direction. London, Routledge, 2002. p. 123–45.
 
12.
Frömel K, Formánková S, Sallis JF. Physical activity and sport preferences of 10 to 14-year-old children: A 5-year prospective study. Acta Uni Palacki Olomuc Gymn. 2002; 32(1): 11–6.
 
13.
Flintoff A. Targeting Mr average: Participation, gender equity and school sport partnerships. Sport Educ Soc. 2008; 13(4): 393–411.
 
14.
Couturier L, E., Chepko S, Coughlin MA. Whose gym is it? Gendered perspectives on middle and secondary school physical education. Phys Educator. 2007; 64(3): 152–8.
 
15.
Armstrong N, Welsman JR. The physical activity patterns of European youth with reference to methods of assessment. Sports Med. 2006; 36(12): 1067–86.
 
16.
Vander Ploeg KA, Biao W, McGavock J, Veugelers J. Physical activity among Canadian children on school days and nonschool days. 2012; 9(8): 1138–45.
 
17.
Duncan EK, Duncan JS, Schofield G. Pedometer-determined physical activity and active transport in girls. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5(1): 2.
 
18.
Coakley J, White A. Making decisions: Gender and sport participation among British adolescents. Sociol Sport J. 1992; 9(1): 20–35.
 
19.
Pate RR, Davis MG, Robinson TN, Stone EJ, McKenzie TL, Young JC. Promoting physical activity in children and youth: A leadership role for schools: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Physical Activity Committee) in collaboration with the Councils on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation. 2006; 114(11): 1214–24.
 
20.
Burgeson CR, Wechsler H, Brener ND, Young JC, Spain CG. Physical education and activity: Results from the school health policies and programs study 2000. J School Health. 2001; 71(7): 279–93.
 
21.
Fairclough SJ, Stratton G. Improving health-enhancing physical activity in girls’ physical education. Health Educ Res. 2005; 20(4): 448–57.
 
22.
McKenzie TL, Catellier DJ, Conway T, Lytle LA, Grieser M, Webber LA et al. Girls’ activity levels and lesson contexts in middle school PE: TAAG Baseline. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(7): 1229–35.
 
23.
Evenson KR, Ballard K, Lee G, Ammerman A. Implementation of a school-based state policy to increase physical activity. J School Health. 2009; 79(5): 231–8.
 
24.
Hohepa M, Schofield G, Kolt GS, Scragg R, Garrett N. Pedometerdetermined physical activity levels of adolescents: Differences by age, sex, time of week, and transportation mode to school. J Phys Act Health. 2008; 5: S140-S52.
 
25.
Oliver M, Schofield G, McEvoy E. An integrated curriculum approach to increasing habitual physical activity in children: A feasibility study. J School Health. 2006; 76(2): 74–9.
 
26.
Schofield L, Mummery WK, Schofield G. Effects of a controlled pedometer-intervention trial for low-active adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37(8): 1414–20.
 
27.
Zizzi S, Vitullo E, Rye J, O’Hara-Tompkins N, Abildso C, Fisher B et al. Impact of a three-week pedometer intervention on high school students’ daily step counts and perceptions of physical activity. Am J Health Educ. 2006; 37(1): 35–40.
 
28.
Pangrazi RP, Beighle A, Sidman CL. Pedometer power: 67 lessons for K-12. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2003.
 
29.
Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Callister R, Collins CE. Effects of integrating pedometers, parental materials, and e-mail support within an extracurricular school sport intervention. J Adolesc Health. 2009; 44: 176–83.
 
30.
Nováková-Lokvencová P, Frömel K, Chmelík F, Groffik D, Bebčáková V. School and weekend physical activity of 15–16 year old Czech, Slovak and Polish adolescents. Acta Uni Palacki Olomuc Gymn. 2011; 41(3): 39–45.
 
31.
Zhu W. Promoting physical activity using technology. Pres Counc Phys Fit Sports Res Dig. 2008; 9(3): 1–8.
 
32.
Welk GJ. The role of physical activity assessments for school-based physical activity promotion. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2008; 12(3): 184–206.
 
33.
Chan CB, Tudor-Locke C. Real-world evaluation of a communitybased pedometer intervention. J Phys Act Health. 2008; 5(5): 648–64.
 
34.
Ryan RM, Frederick CM, Lepes D, Rubio N, Sheldon KM. Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. 1997; 28(4): 335–54.
 
35.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(8): 1381–95.
 
36.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Cultural adaptation. https://sites.google.com/site/.... (access: 2012.10.10). 37. De Vries SI, Bakker I, Hopman-Rock M, Hirasing RA, Van Mechelen W. Clinimetric review of motion sensors in children and adolescents. 2006; 59(7): 670–80.
 
37.
Center for Kinanthropology Research. Long term monitoring: A month-pedometer. http://www.cfkr.eu/en/ke-staze.... (access: 2012.10.10). 39. INDARES.COM. International database for research and educational support. http://www.indares.com/public/.... (access: 2012.10.10).
 
38.
Tudor-Locke C, Giles-Corti B, Knuiman M, McCormack G. Tracking of pedometer-determined physical activity in adults who relocate: results from RESIDE. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5(1): 39.
 
39.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire. IPAQ scoring protocol. http://www.ipaq.ki.se/scoring..... (access: 2012.10.10).
 
40.
Bauman AE, Bull FC, Chey T, Craig CL, Ainsworth B, E., Sallis JF et al. The international prevalence study on physical activity: Results from 20 countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6(1): 21.
 
41.
Tolson H. An adjunct to statistical significance: ω2 . Res Q Exerc Sport. 1980; 51(3): 580–4.
 
42.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York (US): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
 
43.
Sheskin DJ. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007.
 
44.
Flohr JA, Todd MK. Pedometer counts among young adolescents: A comparison between after school activity program participants and non-participants. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(5): S342.
 
45.
Duncan JS, Schofield G, Duncan EK. Pedometer-determined physical activity and body composition in New Zealand children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(8): 1402–9.
 
46.
Tuček M, Friedlanderová H, MEDIAN. Češi na prahu nového tisíciletí (The Czech in new century) [in Czech]. Praha: SLON, 2000.
 
47.
European Commission. Sport and physical activity.Special Eurobarometer 334. Brussels: TNS Opinion & Social, 2010.
 
48.
Šafr J, Patočková V. Trávení volného času v České republice ve srovnání s evropskými zeměmi (Leisure in the Czech Republic in a brief comparison with European countries.) [in Czech]. Nase spol. 2010; 2: 21–7.
 
49.
Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Whitt MC, Thompson RW, Addy CL, Jones DA. The relationship between pedometer-determined ambulatory activity and body composition variables. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001; 25(11): 1571–8.
 
50.
Chan CB, Ryan DAJ, Tudor-Locke CE. Health benefits of a pedometerbased physical activity intervention in sedentary workers. Prev Med. 2004; 39(6): 1215–22.
 
51.
Beighle A, Morgan CF, Pangrazi RP. Using pedometers in elementary physical education. Teach Elem Phys Educ. 2004; 15(1): 17–8.
 
52.
Scruggs PW. Middle school physical education physical activity quantification: A pedometer steps/min guideline. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007; 78(4): 284–92.
 
53.
Morgan CF, Pangrazi RP, Beighle A. Using pedometers to promote physical activity in physical education. J Phys Educ Recr Dance. 2003; 74(7): 33–8.
 
54.
Croteau KA. A preliminary study on the impact of a pedometer-based intervention on daily steps. Am J Health Promot. 2004; 18(3): 217–20.
 
55.
Taymoori P, Niknami S, Berry T, Lubans D, Ghofranipour F, Kazemnejad A. A school-based randomized controlled trial to improve physical activity among Iranian high school girls. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5(1): 18.
 
56.
Bjornson KF. Physical activity monitoring in children and youths. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2005; 17(1): 37–45.
 
57.
Sallis JF, Zakarian JM, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR. Ethnic, socioeconomic, and sex differences in physical activity among adolescents. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49(2): 125–34.
 
58.
Pelclová J, El Ansari W, Vašíčková J. Study of day, month and season pedometer-determined variability of physical activity of high school pupils in the Czech Republic. J Sports Sci Med. 2010; 9(3): 490–8.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966