RESEARCH PAPER
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Contextual Body Image Questionnaire for Athletes for young physically active Polish adults
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Physical Education and Lifelong Sports, University of Physical Education, Poznań, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Joanna Borowiec   

Department of Physical Education and Lifelong Sports, Poznan University of Physical Education, Królowej Jadwigi 27/39, Poland, 61–871, Poznań, Poland
 
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2023;30(3):543-548
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Individuals who are not professional and competitive athletes but who engage in regular (even daily) physical activity may experience a different body image in the context of physical activity compared with that in everyday life. The Contextual Body Image Questionnaire for Athletes (CBIQA) has been developed to assess aspects of body image within these two dimensions, but has not yet been validated in the Polish population. This study aimed to conduct a cross-cultural adaptation of the CBIQA for physically active Polish adults.

Material and methods:
The study sample comprised 90 young Polish adults (49 women and 41 men). All respondents regularly participated in recreational sports. The average age of the sample was 21.4 years. All participants engaged in physical activity at least 3 times per week. The average training experience was 8.6 years. A 3-phase study was conducted: 1) translation of the CBIQA for use in a Polish sample, 2) pretesting and cognitive debriefing, and 3) evaluation of the test-retest reliability. The test-retest interval was 7 days. Interclass correlation coefficients were calculated.

Results:
The 1-week test- retest results (ICC) ranged from 0.83–0.94 in the daily life subscales and from 0.86–0.95 in the athletic subscales among all participants. The reliability of the CBIQA was high. The alpha value for the internal consistency of the translated and adapted instrument was 0.91. After the translation and cognitive interview, 3 sentences were reworded to adapt the instrument to Polish culture.

Conclusions:
The CBIQA exhibited a high tes-retest reliability and good validity for assessing daily and physical activity-related body image in a Polish population.

 
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Cash TF. Body image: Past, present, and future. Body Image. 2004;1(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1740–....
 
2.
Howie EK, McVeigh JA, Smith AJ, et al. Organized sport trajectories from childhood to adolescence and health associations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:1331–9. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.00....
 
3.
Griffiths S, Hay P, Mitchison D, et al. Sex differences in the relationships between body dissatisfaction, quality of life and psychological distress. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016;40(6):518–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753–6....
 
4.
Paxton SJ, Eisenberg ME, Neumark-Sztainer D. Prospective predictors of body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls and boys: a five-year longitudinal study. Dev Psychol. 2006;42(5):888–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012–1....
 
5.
De Bruin AK, Oudejans RR, Bakker FC. Dieting and body image in aesthetic sports: A comparison of Dutch female gymnasts and non-aesthetic sport participants. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2007;8(4):507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyc....
 
6.
De Bruin AK, Oudejans RR. Athletes’ body talk: The role of contextual body image in eating disorders as seen through the eyes of elite women athletes. J Clin Sport Psychol. 2018;12(4):675–698. https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2....
 
7.
Tylka TL, Wood-Barcalow NL. What is and what is not positive body image? Conceptual foundations and construct definition. Body Image. 2015;14:118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.body....
 
8.
Pustivšek S, Hadžić V, Dervišević E, et al. Risk for eating disorders and body composition among adolescent female and male athletes and non-athlete controls. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2020;32(4):20170190. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-....
 
9.
Krane V, Waldron J, Michalenok J, et al. Body image concerns in female exercisers and athletes: A feminist cultural studies perspective. Women Sport Phys Act J. 2001;10(1):17–54. https://doi.org/10.1123/wspaj.....
 
10.
Kantanista A, Glapa A, Banio A, et al. Body image of highly trained female athletes engaged in different types of sport. Biomed Res Int. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6....
 
11.
Soulliard ZA, Kauffman AA, Fitterman-Harris HF. Body image, sport confidence, flow state, and subjective performance among student athletes and non-athletes. Body Image. 2019;28:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.body....
 
12.
Longobardi C, Prino LE, Fabris MA, et al. Muscle dysmorphia and psychopathology: Findings from an Italian sample of male bodybuilders. Psychiatry Res. 2017;256:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyc....
 
13.
Chapa DA, Johnson SN, Richson BN, et al. Eating-disorder psychopathology in female athletes and non-athletes: a meta-analysis. Int J Eat Disord. 2022;55(7):861–885. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23....
 
14.
Guszkowska M. The body image of physically active and inactive women. Pol J Sports Med. 2015;22(2):74–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjst-2....
 
15.
Bailey KA, Cline LE, Gammage KL. Exploring the complexities of body image experiences in middle age and older adult women within an exercise context: The simultaneous existence of negative and positive body images. Body Image. 2016;17:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.body....
 
16.
Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Richardson B, Lewis V, et al. Do women with greater trait body dissatisfaction experience body dissatisfaction states differently? An experience sampling study. Body Image. 2018;25:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.body....
 
17.
De Bruin AP, Oudejans RR, Bakker FC, et al. Contextual body image and athletes’ disordered eating: The contribution of athletic body image to disordered eating in high performance women athletes. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2011;19(3):201–215. https://doi.org/10.1123/jcsp.2....
 
18.
Ricciardelli LA, McCabe MP. Psychometric evaluation of the Body Change Inventory: An assessment instrument for adolescent boys and girls. Eat Behav. 2002;3(1):45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471–....
 
19.
Cash TF. User’s Manual for the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ, 3rd revision). https://moam.info/queue/mbsrq-...# (access: 2022.12.21).
 
20.
Gruber AJ, Pope HG, Borowiecki J, et al. The development of the somatomorphic matrix: A bi-axial instrument for measuring body image in men and women. In: Norton K, Olds T, Kollman J, editors, Kinanthropometry VI. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry, Adelaide; 1999. p. 217–231.
 
21.
Stewart T, Kilpela L, Wesley N, et al. Psychometric properties of the contextual body image questionnaire for athletes: a replication and extension study in female collegiate athletes. J Eat Disord. 2021;9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337....
 
22.
Danckers E. An Observational Study of Contextual Body Image in NCAA Division 1 Female Athletes. Master’s thesis, Ohio State University, 2017. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/... (access: 2022.12.21).
 
23.
Drwal R. Adaptacja kwestionariuszy osobowości. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN;1995.
 
24.
Potter SR. A cross-sectional study of body image attitudes in male collegiate club athletes. Master’s thesis, Ohio State University, 2018. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/... (access: 2022.12.21).
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top