RESEARCH PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Disability has an individualized character, both in terms of causes and effects, including limitation of locomotor skills. This is the problem to a great extent determining the level of daily functioning and the quality of life. The aim of the study was assessment of locomotor capabilities according to the demographic, social and health characteristics, and the frequency of problems of daily life according to the scope of locomotor capabilities.

Material and methods:
The study included 676 disabled aged 19–98; mean age 64. The survey was carried out using a standardized Disability Questionnaire.

Results:
Statistically significant differences in categories of locomotor capabilities were observed according to age, education, material standard, housing conditions, legal disability status, and degrees of disability. Ten problems varying in intensity occurred according to the scope of independent moving around: material difficulties, difficulties in settling office matters, loneliness (P<0.0001), too infrequent contacts with the family, negative attitude of surroundings towards disability, material dependence on others, lack of care by relatives and friends, difficult access to environmental nurse, difficult access to services from social worker, necessity of caring for a disabled person.

Conclusions:
Locomotor capabilities of the disabled decrease over 64. Low level of education, material standard and poor housing conditions are associated with decreased capabilities for independent moving around without limitations. The types and number of problems with which the disabled struggle depends on the scope of their capabilities for independent moving around. In every dimension of functioning disability belongs to the scope of issues of public health.

 
REFERENCES (47)
1.
Strategia na rzecz Osób z Niepełnosprawnościami 2021–2030. Dane demograficzne. Biuro Pełnomocnika Rządu do Spraw Osób Niepełnosprawnych; 2022.
 
2.
Twardowski A. Społeczny model niepełnosprawności – analiza krytyczna. Studia Edukacyjne. 2018;48:97–114.
 
3.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Union of Equality: Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021–2030. European Commission, Brussels, 3.3;2021. COM(2021) 101 final 3.3.2021.
 
4.
Górski W. Aspekty organizacyjne i kadrowe rehabilitacji leczniczej w Polsce. In: Stan rehabilitacji i potrzeby rehabilitacyjne osób o poszczególnych rodzajach niepełnosprawności. Warszawa: Wyd. Instytutu Filozofii i Socjologii PAN; 1994. p. 295–309.
 
5.
Rehabilitacja osób niepełnosprawnych – Rehabilitacja zawodowa i społeczna oraz zatrudnianie osób niepełnosprawnych. Rozdział 3. DzU 2023.100 tj. Akt obowiązujący. Wersja od: 25 stycznia 2023r. do: 6 kwietnia 2023r.
 
6.
Kołłątaj B, Kołłątaj WP, Panasiuk L, et al. Importance of most frequent needs of the disabled in shaping areas of support in public health. Part I. Analysis of selected demographic and social characteristics of the disabled with consideration of the causes of body dysfunction, legal disability status, and selected characteristics of the state of health. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2021;28(4):692–704. doi: https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/....
 
7.
Kołłątaj B, Kołłątaj WP, Nasiłowska-Barud A, et al. Importance of most frequent needs of the disabled in shaping areas of support in public health. Part. II. Disability as a consequence of dysfunction in the state of health disrupting daily functioning based on selected health and socio-demographic characteristics – interdisciplinary problems in the domain of public health. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2022;29(4):489–501. doi: https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/....
 
8.
Ferguson GA, Takane Y. Analiza statystyczna w psychologii i pedagogice. Warszawa: PWN; 1999.
 
9.
Using Adjusted Standardized Residuals for Interpreting Contingency Tables: Statnews #95. Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit Created December 2018. Last updated August 2020. https://cscu.cornell.edu/wp-co....
 
10.
Glen S. ‘Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure’ From StatisticsHowTo.com: Elementary Statistics for the rest of us. https://www.statisticshowto.co....
 
11.
Międzynarodowa Klasyfikacja Funkcjonowania Niepełnosprawności i Zdrowia (ICF). © Światowa Organizacja Zdrowia; 2009. Tytuł oryginału: International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)© Światowa Organizacja Zdrowia; 2001.
 
12.
Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska A, Bilski D. Międzynarodowa Klasyfikacja Funkcjonowania, Niepełnosprawności i Zdrowia. 5© Niepełnosprawność – zagadnienia, problemy, rozwiązania. Nr II/2013(7), 5–20.
 
13.
Lindsay A, King J. Evaluating housing concerns for people with physical disabilities: Barriers, best practices, and policy implications. CHRT; 2022. Evaluating-housing-concerns-for-ppl-with-disabilities.pdf [Available 3.03.2023].
 
14.
Okoro C, Hollis ND, Cyrus AC, et al. Prevalence of Disabilities and Health Care Access by Disability Status and Type Among Adults – United States, 2016. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, August; 2018.
 
15.
Niepełnosprawność sprzężona. Gazeta Prawna, autor: Artur Radwan, opr. GR, 2008.
 
16.
Thompson AK, Fiorenza G, Smyth L, et al. Operant conditioning of the motor-evoked potential and locomotion in people with and without chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. 28 Feb 2019 https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.005....
 
17.
Profilaktyka przewlekłych bólów kręgosłupa. Raport w sprawie zalecanych technologii medycznych, działań przeprowadzanych w ramach programów polityki zdrowotnej oraz warunków realizacji tych programów (art. 48a ust. 1 Ustawy). Raport nr: OT.423.3.2019. Agencja Oceny Technologii Medycznych i Taryfikacji Wydział Oceny Technologii Medycznych, Warszawa; 2020.
 
18.
Hunt ER, Papathomas A. Being physically active through chronic illness: life experiences of people with arthritis Qualitative Research in Sport. Exer Health. 2020; 12(2): 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/215967....
 
19.
Przychodzka E, Grudzień A, Celej-Szuster J, et al. Ocena wydolności funkcjonalnej chorych po udarze mózgu. Gerontol Pol. 2019;27:272–279.
 
20.
Avelino PR, Kenia KP, Menezes KKP, et al. Walking speed best explains perceived locomotion ability in ambulatory people with chronic stroke, assessed by the ABILOCO questionnaire. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019;23(5): 412–418. https://www.journals.elsevier.....
 
21.
Faria-Fortini I, Basílio ML, Scianni AA, et al. Performance and capacity-based measures of locomotion, compared to impairment-based measures, best predicted participation in individuals with hemiparesis due to stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;11:1–8.
 
22.
CCD. ‘CCD Virtual Briefing on the ADA at 32: Achieving Accessible, Integrated, and Affordable Housing for People with Disabilities’. Consortium for Constituents with Disabilities, July 26; 2022.
 
23.
Aurand A, Threet D, Ikra R, Yentel D. ‘The GAP: Shortage of Affordable Homes. National Low Income Housing Coalition, March; 2021; 31.
 
24.
OECD. A Crisis on the Horizon: Ensuring Affordable, Accessible Housing for People with Disabilities. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. Vol. 261. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, September 3; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/306e69....
 
25.
Giedrojć M. Niepełnosprawność w Polsce w wymiarze politycznym i społecznym. Analiza wybranych zagadnień. Warszawa: Difin; 2020.
 
26.
Sierpińska L. Assessment of the degree of illness acceptance in patients diagnosed with hepatitis C. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2022;29(2): 224–231. doi: https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/....
 
27.
Stuckey R, Draganovic P, Ullah MM, et al. Barriers and facilitators to work participation for persons with lower limb amputations in Bangladesh following prosthetic rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020 Oct;44(5):279–289. doi: 10.1177/0309364620934322. Epub 2020 Jul 20. PMID: 32686604.
 
28.
Szulc P. Bariery w życiu codziennym i ich wpływ na jakość życia osób z niepełnosprawnościami. Przegląd Krytyczny; 2021;3(2):51–64.
 
29.
Belzunegui-Eraso A, Pastor-Gosálbez I, Puig-Andreu X, et al. Risk of Exclusion in People with Disabilities in Spain: Determinants of Health and Poverty. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 27;15(10);2129. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102129. PMID: 30262774; PMCID: PMC6210139.
 
30.
Paluszkiewicz M. Wolność pracy osób z niepełnosprawnościami jako wartość prawnie chroniona. Wyd. Uniwersytet Łódzki; 2019. ISBN 978-83-8142-539-1.
 
31.
Sierpińska L. Expectations of patients with hepatitis C from family physicians – a Polish example. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2022: 29(4);529–537. doi: https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/....
 
32.
Badanie potrzeb osób niepełnosprawnych. Raport końcowy. PFRON, Badania Społeczne Marzena Sochańska-Kawiecka, 18 maja; 2017.
 
33.
Emerson E, Fortune N, Llewellyn G, et al. Loneliness, social support, social isolation and wellbeing among working age adults with and without disability: Cross-sectional study Disability and Health Journal; 2021, 1–7. The Official Journal of the American Association on Health and Disability.
 
34.
Borowiecki P. Samotność osób dorosłych z niepełnosprawnością ruchową – konteksty indywidualne i społeczne. Warszawa: Wyd. Borgis; 2021.
 
35.
Hilbert A, Zenger M, Luck-Sikorski C, et al. Weight Stigma and Disease and Disability Concepts of Obesity: A Survey of the German Population. Obes Facts. 2021;14(5):463–470. doi: 10.1159/000516494. Epub 2021 Aug 30. PMID: 34461612; PMCID: PMC8546454.
 
36.
Fulton M, Srinivasan VN. Obesity, Stigma and Discrimination. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan. 2022 Mar 16.
 
37.
Tomiyama AJ, Carr D, Granberg EM, et al. How and why weight stigma drives the obesity ‘epidemic’ and harms health. BMC Medicine; 2018, 16:123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916....
 
38.
Puhl RM, Lessard LM, Pearl RL, et al. Policies to address weight iscrimination and bullying: Perspectives of adults engaged in weight management from six nations. Obesity (Silver Spring); 2021 Nov;29(11):1787–1798. doi: 10.1002/oby.23275. Epub 2021 Oct 5. PMID: 34612007; PMCID: PMC8571064.
 
39.
Subu MA, Wati DF, Netrida N, et al. Types of stigma experienced by patients with mental illness and mental health nurses in Indonesia: a qualitative content analysis. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Oct 18;15(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00502-x. PMID: 34663399; PMCID: PMC8524985.
 
40.
Sulaimani MF, Wid H, DaghustaniWH. Autism in Saudi Arabia: Media and the Medical Model of Disability. Hindawi Educ Res Inter. 2022, Article ID 4824606, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4....
 
41.
Macdonald SJ, Deacon L, Nixon J, et al. The invisible enemy: disability, loneliness and isolation; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/096875....
 
42.
Camanni G, Ciccone O, Lepri A, et al. Intellectual Disability and Psychiatric Disorders as Exclusion Criteria in Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT). Psychiatr Danub. 2021 Dec;33(Suppl 11):36–39. PMID: 34862888.
 
43.
Lee H, Son I, Yoon J, et al. Lookism hurts: appearance discrimination and self-rated health in South Korea. Int J Equity Health; 2017 Nov 25;16(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0678-8. PMID: 29178889; PMCID: PMC5702199.
 
44.
Janiak M. Bezpieczeństwo osób z niepełnoprawnością ruchową, jako zadanie władz samorządowych. Przykład powiatu gnieźnieńskiego. Rocznik Bezpieczeństwa Międzynarodowego. 2018; 12,2:261–269.
 
45.
Friedman C. Family Members of People with Disabilities’ Explicit and Implicit Disability Attitudes. Rehabilitatio Psychology; 2019, doi: 10.1037/rep0000265.
 
46.
Informator dla osób z niepełnosprawnością. Wyd. Zakład Ubezpieczeń Zdrowotnych, Państwowy Fundusz Rehabilitacji Osób Niepełnosprawnych: Warszawa; 2022.
 
47.
Albin K, Bieganowska-Skóra A, Biel-Ziółek K, et al. O niepełnosprawności: definicje. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia de Cultura 10(1);2018,13–29. doi 10.24917/20837275.10.1.2.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top