Online first
Current issue
Archive
Special Issues
About the Journal
Publication Ethics
Anti-Plagiarism system
Instructions for Authors
Instructions for Reviewers
Editorial Board
Editorial Office
Contact
Reviewers
All Reviewers
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
General Data Protection Regulation (RODO)
RESEARCH PAPER
Human as a potential vector of bovine tuberculosis in cattle
1
Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland
2
Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education, Biala Podlaska, Poland
3
Department of Food Higiene and Public Health Protection, University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
4
Department of Microbiology, National Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
Corresponding author
Monika Krajewska-Wędzina
Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland
Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Puławy, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2019;26(3):396-399
KEYWORDS
bovine tuberculosisMycobacterium bovisepidemiologyzoonosismycobacteriologypublic healthtransmissiontuberculosis
TOPICS
Biological agents posing occupational risk in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry and diseases caused by these agents (zoonoses, allergic and immunotoxic diseases)Prevention of occupational diseases in agriculture, forestry, food industry and wood industry
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB, bovine TB) is caused by mycobacteria which are grouped within the MTBC. TB in animals is a highly infectious and progressive disease which can be transmitted to humans. Since 2009, Poland has gained official bTB-free status. Despite the official fact of bTB-free status, a dozen bTB outbreaks are still noted each year. Since 2000 in Poland, every year 1/5 of the national herd is subject to intradermal skin TB testing to control the bTB outbreaks in the cattle population. Application, with 5-year intervals between each government-funded skin test, undoubtedly resulted in financial savings. However it also seems to have caused several adverse and worrying events, e.g. an increase in the number of reactors detected and removed from a single tested herd. The objective of this study was the examination of 898 cattle imputed with bTB infection in Poland between 2008–2012.
Material and methods:
The study concerned a potential epidemic outbreak with suspected bTB transmission. 20 cows came from 3 herds in the same county located in the same province in southern Poland.
Results:
134 MTBC strains were identified. In MIRU-VNTR, all isolates showed the same genetic pattern 322532243421232. Based on molecular investigation, the characteristics of M. bovis strains isolated from cattle from 3 different herds confirmed the common source of this zoonotic disease.
Conclusions:
Although not bacteriologically proven, everything points to the fact that humans were the vector of bovine tuberculosis transmission between herds. This finding confirms transmission between 3 cattle herds in the Małopolskie Province in southern Poland (Podhale). The outbreak of tuberculosis in animals finally compromised public health.
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB, bovine TB) is caused by mycobacteria which are grouped within the MTBC. TB in animals is a highly infectious and progressive disease which can be transmitted to humans. Since 2009, Poland has gained official bTB-free status. Despite the official fact of bTB-free status, a dozen bTB outbreaks are still noted each year. Since 2000 in Poland, every year 1/5 of the national herd is subject to intradermal skin TB testing to control the bTB outbreaks in the cattle population. Application, with 5-year intervals between each government-funded skin test, undoubtedly resulted in financial savings. However it also seems to have caused several adverse and worrying events, e.g. an increase in the number of reactors detected and removed from a single tested herd. The objective of this study was the examination of 898 cattle imputed with bTB infection in Poland between 2008–2012.
Material and methods:
The study concerned a potential epidemic outbreak with suspected bTB transmission. 20 cows came from 3 herds in the same county located in the same province in southern Poland.
Results:
134 MTBC strains were identified. In MIRU-VNTR, all isolates showed the same genetic pattern 322532243421232. Based on molecular investigation, the characteristics of M. bovis strains isolated from cattle from 3 different herds confirmed the common source of this zoonotic disease.
Conclusions:
Although not bacteriologically proven, everything points to the fact that humans were the vector of bovine tuberculosis transmission between herds. This finding confirms transmission between 3 cattle herds in the Małopolskie Province in southern Poland (Podhale). The outbreak of tuberculosis in animals finally compromised public health.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Karlson AG, Lessel EF. Mycobacterium bovis nom. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1970; 20: 273–282.
2.
Aranaz A, Cousins DV, Mateos A, Dominguez L. Elevation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis subsp. caprae Aranaz et al. 1999 to species rank as Mycobacterium caprae comb. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003; 53: 1785–1789.
3.
Rodriguez-Campos S, Smith NH, Boniotti MB and Aranaz A. Overview and phylogeny of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms: implication for diagnostics and legislation of bovine tuberculosis. Res Vet Sci. 2014; 97: S5-S19. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.02.009.
4.
Krajewska-Wędzina M, Augustynowicz-Kopeć E, Weiner M, Szulowski K. Treatment for active tuberculosis in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) in a Zoo and potential consequences for public health – Case report. Ann Agric Environ Med. doi: 10.26444/aaem/75685.
5.
Orłowska B, Augustynowicz-Kopeć E, Krajewska M, Zabost A, Welz M, Kaczor S, Anusz K. Mycobacterium caprae transmission to free-living grey wolves (Canis lupus) in the Bieszczady Mountains in Southern Poland. Eur J Wildl Res. 2017; 63(1): 1–5.
6.
Augustynowicz-Kopeć E, Krajewska M, Zabost A, Napiórkowska A, Zwolska Z. Characterization of Mycobacterium bovis strains isolated from farm and wild animals in Poland. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 2011; 55: 381–383.
7.
Caminiti A, Pelone F, LaTorre G, De Giusti M, Saulle R, Mannocci A, Sala M, Della Marta U, Scaramozzino P. Control and eradication of tuberculosis in cattle: a systematic review of economic evidence. Vet Rec. 2016; 179(3): 70–75.
8.
Anusz K, Orłowska B, Krajewska-Wędzina M, Augustynowicz-Kopeć E, Krzysiak M, Bielecki W, Witkowski L, Welz M, Kita J. Ante-mortem and post-mortem tuberculosis diagnostics in three European Bison (Bison bonasus caucasicus) from the enclosure in Bukowiec in the Bieszczady National Park in Poland. Med Weter. 2017; 73(10): 642–646.
9.
Gallagher J, Clifton-Hadley RS. Tuberculosis in badgers; a review of the disease and its significance for other animals. Res Vet Sci. 2000; 69(3): 203–217.
10.
Corner LA. The role of wild animal populations in the epidemiology of tuberculosis in domestic animals: how to assess the risk. Vet Microbiol. 2006; 112(2–4): 303–312.
11.
Beltrán-Beck B, Ballestros C, Vicente J, de la Fuente J, Gortázar C. Progress in Oral Vaccination against Tuberculosis in Its Main Wildlife Resevoir in Iberia, the Eurasian Wild Boar. Vet Med Int. 2012; doi: 10.1155/2012/978501.
12.
Brent AJ, Mugo D, Musyimi R, Mutiso A, Morpeth S, Levin M, Scott JA. Performance of the MGIT TBc identification test and meta-analysis of MPT64 assays for identification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in liquid culture. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49(12): 4343–4346.
13.
Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol. 1997; 35(4): 907–914.
14.
Smith NH, Upton P. Naming spoligotype patterns for the RD9-deleted lineage of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex; www.Mbovis.org. Infect Genet Evol. 2012; 12(4): 873–876.
15.
Supply P, Lesjean S, Savine E, Kremer K, van Soolingen D, Locht C. Automated high-throughput genotyping for study of global epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis based on mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units. J Clin Microbiol. 2001; 39, 3563–3571.
16.
Berg S, Smith NH. Why doesn’t bovine tuberculosis transmit between humans? Trends Microbiol. 2014; 22(10): 552–553.
17.
Osek J, Wieczorek K. Prevalence of zoonoses in animals and zoonotic agents in food in Europe in 2013. Życie Wet. 2015; 90(4): 210–216.
18.
Kozińska M, Zientek J, Augustynowicz-Kopeć E, Zwolska Z, Kozielski J. Transmission of tuberculosis among people living in the border areas of Poland, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2016; 126(1–2): 32–40.
19.
Rowińska-Zakrzewska E, Korzeniewska-Koseła M, Augustynowicz-Kopeć E, Szturmowicz M. What factors may influence epidemiological situation of tuberculosis in Poland and in the world? Pneumol Alergol Pol. 2016; 84(2): 126–133.
20.
Kubica T, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Niemann S. Mycobacterium bovis subsp. caprae caused one-third of human M. bovis – associated tuberculosis cases reported in German between 1999 and 2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41(7): 3070–3077.
21.
Torres-Gonzalez P, Cervera-Hernandez ME, Martinez-Gamboa A, Garcia-Garcia L, Cruz-Hervert LP, Bobadilla-Del Valle M, Ponce-de Leon A, Sifuentes-Osornio J. Human tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis: a retrospective comparison with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a Mexican tertiary care centre, 2000–2015. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016; 16(1): 657.
22.
Okolo M. Tuberculosis in apparently healthy milch cows. Microbios. 1992; 69: 105–111.
23.
Roring S, Scott A, Brittain D, Walker I, Hewinson G, Neill S, Skuce R. Development of variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium bovis: comparison of results with those obtained by using existing exact tandem repeats and spoligotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 2002; 40(6): 2126–2133.
24.
Hilty M, Diguimbaye C, Schelling E, Baggi F, Tanner M, Zinsstag J. Evaluation of the discriminatory power of variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) typing of Mycobacterium bovis strains. Vet Microbiol. 2005; 109(3–4): 217–222.
25.
Smith CM, Downs SH, Mitchell A, Hayward1 AC, Fry H, Le Comber SC. Spatial targeting for bovine tuberculosis control: can the locations of infected cattle be used to find infected badgers? 2015; 10(11): doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142710.
26.
Byrne AW, Kenny K, Fogarty U, O’Keeffe JJ, More SJ, McGratha G et al. Spatial and temporal analyses of metrics of tuberculosis infection in badgers (Meles meles) from the Republic of Ireland: Trends in apparent prevalence. Prev Vet Med. 2015; 122(3): 345–354.
27.
Lipiec M, Nowakowski K, Radulski Ł, Iwaniak W, Ważna A. Badgers as a potential source of bovine tuberculosis – first studies in Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. doi: 10.26444/aaem/80984.
28.
Cvetnic Z, Katalinic-Jankovic V, Sostaric B, Spicic S, Obrovac M, Marjanovic S, Benic M, Kirin BK, Vickovic I. Mycobacterium caprae in cattle and humans in Croatia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007; 11(6): 652–658.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No NrRCN/SP/0532/2021/1 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2025 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
