Effects of aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise programme on aerobic and anaerobic capacity, somatic features and blood lipid profile in collegate females
More details
Hide details
Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw, Poland
Maria Curie Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland
Insitute of Sport, Warsaw, Poland
Corresponding author
Krzysztof Mazurek   

Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(4):844-849
Regular physical activity has many positive health benefits, including reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases and some cancers, as well as improving the quality of life.

The aim of the study was to examine the effects of 8-week aerobic interval cycle exercise training (AIT) compared to continuous cycle exercises of moderate intensity (CME) on the aerobic and anaerobic capacity, somatic features and lipid profile.

Material and Methods:
The research was conducted in 88 volunteers aged 19.5±0.6 years, who were randomized to three groups of organized physical activity (OPA), who exercised 3 times per week in 47 min sessions: (I) AIT (n=24) comprising 2 series of 6x10 s sprinting with maximal pedalling cadence and active rest pedalling with intensity 65%–75% HRmax, (II) CME (n=22) corresponding to 65%-75% HRmax, (III) regular collegiate physical education classes of programmed exercises (CON; n=42). Before and after OPA anthropometrics, aero- and anaerobic capacity and lipid profile indices were measured.

In AIT, a significantly greater decrease of waist circumference and WHR was noted when compared to CON, and a significantly greater reduction of sum of skinfolds than in CON and CME. Improvement in relative and absolute VO2max (L/min and ml/kg/min) was significantly higher in AIT than CON. Work output and peak power output in the anaerobic test improved significantly in AIT, CME and CON, but independently of training type. OPA was effective only in reducing triglyceride concentrations in CME and CON groups, without interaction effects in relation to training type.

It was found that 8 weeks of OPA was beneficial in improving somatic and aerobic capacity indices, but AIT resulted in the greatest improvement in somatic indices (waist circumference, WHR, sum of skinfolds) and in VO[sub]2[/sub]max, compared to CME and CON programmes.

Löllgen H, Böckenhoff A, Knapp G. Physical activity and all-cause mortality: an updated meta-analysis with different intensity categories. Int J Sports Med. 2009; 30(3): 213–224.
Mazurek K, Czajkowska A, Lutosławska G, Żmijewski P, Malara M. The occurrence and distribution of cardiovascular system diseases risk factors among youth with different levels of physical activity. Med Sport. 2008; 12(3): 86–91.
American College of Sports Medicine. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43(7): 1334–1359.
Rana JS, Arsenault BJ, Després JP, Côté M, Talmud PJ, Ninio E, et al. Inflammatory biomarkers, physical activity, waist circumference, and risk of future coronary heart disease in healthy men and women. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32(3): 336–344.
Piotrowicz R, Podolec P, Kopeć G, Drygas W, Mamcarz A, Stańczyk J. Konsensus Rady Redakcyjnej PFP dotyczący aktywności fizycznej. Polskie Forum Profilaktyki Chorób Układu Krążenia. 2008; 12(3): 1–3.
WHO. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
Donnelly JE, Blair SN, Jakicic JM, Manore MM, Rankin JW, Smith BK, et al. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Appropriate physical activity intervention strategies for weight loss and prevention of weight regain for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41(2): 459–471.
Hoffmann K, Bryl W, Marcinkowski JT, Strażyńska A, Pupek-Musialik D. Estimation of physical activity and prevalence of excessive body mass in rural and urban Polish adolescents. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 398–403.
Tjønna AE, Lee SJ, Rognmo Ø, Stølen TO, Bye A, Haram PM, et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise as a treatment for the metabolic syndrome: a pilot study. Circulation. 2008; 118(4): 346–354.
Hatle H, Støbakk PK, Mølmen HE, Brønstad E, Tjønna AE, Steinshamn S, Skogvoll E, Wisløff U, Ingul CB, Rognmo O. Effect of 24 sessions of high-intensity aerobic interval training carried out at either high or moderate frequency, a randomized trial. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2): e88375.
Esfandiari S1, Sasson Z, Goodman JM. Short-term high-intensity interval and continuous moderate-intensity training improve maximal aerobic power and diastolic filling during exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014; 114(2): 331–343.
Mahdiabadi J, Gaeini AA, Kazemi T, Mahdiabadi MA. The effect of aerobic continuous and interval training on the left ventricular structure and function of male non-athletes. Biol Sport. 2013; 30: 207–211.
Kalina RM. Methodology of measurement, documentation and programming of optimal continuous workload with variable intensity – applications in sports medicine, physiotherapy, geriatrics, health-related training and sport for all. Arch Budo. 2012; 8(4): 235–249.
Åstrand PO, Rodhal K. Textbook of Work Physiology. New York: Mc Graw Hill; 1994.
McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Cardiovascular regulation and integration. In: Exercise Physiology by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer Business; 2010. pp.182–183.
National Cholesterol Education Program National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes of Health. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation 2002; 106(25): 3143–3421.
Gibala MJ. High-intensity interval training: a time-efficient strategy for Health promotion? Curr Sports Med Rep. 2007; 6(4): 211–213.
Czernichow S, Kengne AP, Huxley RR, Batty GD, de Galan B, Grobbee D, et al. Comparison of waist-to-hip ratio and other obesity indices as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in people with type-2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study from ADVANCE. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011; 18(2): 312–319.
Huxley R, Mendis S, Zheleznyakov E, Reddy S, Chan J. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist: hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular risk––a review of the literature. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010; 64(1): 16–22.
Ekelund U, Brage S, Franks PW, Hennings S, Emms S, Wareham NJ. Physical activity energy expenditure predicts changes in body composition in middle-aged healthy whites: effect modification by age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 81(5): 964–969.
Burgomaster KA, Howarth KR, Phillips SM, Rakobowchuk M, Macdonald MJ, McGee SL, et al. Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. J Physiol. 2008; 586(1): 151–160.
Sassen B, Cornelissen V, Kiers H, Wittink H, Kok GJ, Vanhees L. Physical fitness matters more than physical activity in controlling cardiovascular disease risk factors. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009; 16(6): 667–683.
Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, Maki M, Yacji Y, Asami M, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women. JAMA. 2009; 301: 2024–2035.
Wisløff U, Støylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo Ø, Haram PM, et al. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation. 2007; 115(24): 3086–3094.
Hazell TJ, Macpherson RE, Gravelle BM, Lemon PW. 10 or 30-s sprint interval training bouts enhance both aerobic and anaerobic performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010; 110(1): 153–160.
Karahan M. The effect of skill-based maximal intensity interval training on aerobic and anaerobic performance of female futsal players. Biol Sport. 2012; 29(3): 223–227.
Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Tran ZV. Aerobic exercise and lipids and lipoproteins in women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004; 13(10): 1148–1164.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top