RESEARCH PAPER
Figure from article: Development of the use  of...
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of drug programs in the Polish: (1) assess whether the centralized financing model contributes to reducing regional disparities in access to modern drug technologies; (2) analyse trends in the number of programs, treated patients, and related public expenditures; and (3) examine associations between regional program utilization and selected socioeconomic indicators, including income, unemployment, and urbanization.

Material and methods:
A mixed-method approach was applied, combining a narrative review of the legal and institutional framework with a secondary analysis of National Health Fund (NFZ) data for 2012–2024. Indicators of program availability, patient numbers, and expenditures were analysed using dynamic measures of change.

Results:
Between 2012 and 2024, the number of drug programs increased from 42 to 133, which was accompanied by a consistent annual growth of approximately 10–11% in both the number of patients and healthcare expenditures. Although regional variation in utilization and spending was observed, no statistically significant associations were found between drug program use and socioeconomic indicators. The average number of services per patient remained relatively stable over time, with a slight downward trend.

Conclusions:
Drug programs represent a stable and effective component of the Polish healthcare system, supporting broader access to innovative therapies and potentially reducing socioeconomic inequalities. The lack of association with regional socioeconomic factors suggests that centralized financing and uniform eligibility criteria may mitigate disparities in access. Nevertheless, organizational and infrastructural factors, such as the distribution of specialized centres, likely continue to influence regional variation.
FUNDING
Publication was funded by the Medical University of Lodz, Department of Social Medicine (project No. 503/6‑029‑ 01/503‑61‑001).
REFERENCES (15)
3.
Patikorn C, Taychakhoonavudh S, Sakulbumrungsil R, et al. Financing Strategies to Facilitate Access to High‑Cost Anticancer Drugs: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(9):1625–1634. https://doi.org/10.34172/IJHPM....
 
4.
Act of 12 May 2011 on the reimbursement of medicines, foodstuffs intended for particular nutritional uses and medical devices (consolidated text: Journal of Laws of 2025, item 907, as amended).
 
5.
Crawford SM, Sauerzapf V, Haynes R, et al. Social and geographical factors affecting access to treatment of lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(6):897–901. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc....
 
6.
Emerson MA, Golightly YM, Aiello AE, et al. Breast cancer treatment delays by socioeconomic and health care access latent classes in Black and White women. Cancer. 2020;126(22):4957–4966. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.3....
 
7.
Bowen SA, Williams EM, Stoneberg‑Cooper CM, et al. Effects of Social Injustice on Breast Health—Seeking Behaviors of Low‑Income Women. Am J Health Promot. 2013;27(4):222–230. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.1....
 
9.
Bourgeois A, Horrill T, Mollison A, et al. Barriers to cancer treatment for people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage in high‑income countries: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024;24(1):670. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913....
 
10.
Vallano A, Pontes C, & Agustí A. The challenges of access to innovative medicines with limited evidence in the European Union. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1215431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.
 
11.
Lawrie K, Charow R, Giuliani M, et al. Cancer and Health Literacy: a scoping review. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2020;31(1):81–104. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.20....
 
12.
Vancoppenolle JM, Franzen N, Koole SN, et al. Differences in time to patient access to innovative cancer medicines in six European countries. Int J Cancer. 2024;154(5):886–894. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34....
 
13.
Akodad S, Goldman M, Stevens H. Early access disparities in innovative therapies across the US, EU, China, and Japan. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025;12:1642882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2....
 
14.
Hofmarcher T, Charalambous A, Normanno N, et al. Access to novel cancer medicines in Europe: inequities across countries and their drivers. ESMO Open. 2025;10(10):105810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmo....
 
15.
Kanavos P, Angelis A, Drummond M. An EU‑wide approach to HTA: An irrelevant development or an opportunity not to be missed? Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(3):329–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10198....
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top