Introduction and objective:
Agriculture and forestry are among the most dangerous professions in Europe, with a high level of accidents affecting the sustainability and viability of the sector. International conventions, EU directives and national legislation build the fundamental basis for prevention. The aim of the study is to describe and categorize national mechanisms of occupational safety and health (OSH) for agricultural workers in Europe, to assess the extent of implementing safety regulation, the body in charge, and to give examples of health and safety initiatives.

Material and methods:
Results of a questionnaire-survey on basic safety regulations on farms sent by e-mail to the representatives of 30 participating European countries in the context of the Sacurima COST action network (CA 16123) are presented. Due to the complexity, only selected countries are described in this study highlighting the regulative bodies, occupational health services or specific training offers, as well as the complexity of the mechanisms.

One of the most serious issues and deficits of EU OSH regulation is the exclusion of self-employed farmers who compose nearly 90% of the farming population. This leads to serious under-reporting of accidents, and because one of the most common measures for the performance of health and safety initiatives are the injury and ill health statistics, better registration systems are urgently needed in almost all countries as a basis for preventive efforts.

The results of the study provide a basis for raising awareness about the current OSH systems in Europe, and the importance of developing sector specific OSH strategies. The proposed activities should assist in tackling high accident rates and poor occupational health for self-employed farmers.

The authors would like to thank all COST action CA16123 members for their support in answering the questionnaire, and also acknowledge the leading team of the action for their  constant management and maintaining the lively network.
Merisalu E, Leppälä J, Jakob M, Rautiainen RH. Variation in eurostat and national statistics of accidents in agriculture. Agron Res. 2019; 17(5): 1969–1983. doi:10.15159/AR.19.190.
Karttunen JP, Rautiainen RH. Distribution and characteristics of occupational injuries and diseases among farmers: A retrospective analysis of workers’ compensation claims. Am J Ind Med. 2013; 56(8): 856–869. doi:
Karttunen JP, Leppälä J, Rautiainen R. Disability outcomes and measures to extend working careers of Finnish farmers. 2014 (access: 2021.1.11).
Walker G. Occupational health priorities in agriculture, Report of a conference on occupational health in agriculture, 11 October 2001, Health and Safety Commission and Royal Agricultural Society of England, Stoneleigh, UK.
Osborne A, Blake C, Fullen BM, et al. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among farmers: A systematic review. Am J Ind Med. 2012; 55(2): 143–158. doi: 10.1002/ajim.21033.
Ulrich C, Salavastru C, Agner T, et al. The European Status Quo in legal recognition and patient-care services of occupational skin cancer. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016; 30(S3): 46–51. doi:
Donham J, Thelin A. Agricultural Medicine: Rural Occupational and Environmental Health, Safety, and Prevention, 2nd ed. Wiley; 2016.
Lundqvist P, Gustafsson B. Accidents and accident prevention in agriculture a review of selected studies. Int J Ind Ergon. 1992; 10(4): 311–319. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(92)90098-K.
The State of Health in the EU: Companion Report 2019. European Commission’s Directorate – General of Health and Food Safety (DG SANTE).
Kolodziejczak M. Food self-sufficiency in EU countries: an attempted projection to 2080. Proceedings of Agrarian perspectives xxvii. Food safety-food security. 2018 Sept 19–20, Prague, Czech Republic.
McNamara J, Fox M, Kinsella J, O’Connor D. Promoting Farmer occupational safety and health (OSH) services through Extension. Agron Res. 2021; 19(X), xxx–ccc, Published online 2021. doi: 10.15159/ar.21.059.
Alwall Svennefelt C, Lundqvist P. Safe Farmer Common Sense’ – A National Five-Year Education-Based Program for Prevention of Occupational Injuries in Swedish Agriculture-Background, Process, and Evaluation. J Agromedicine. 2020; 25(2): 221–230. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1659203.
Holte KA, Follo G. Making occupational health and safety training relevant for farmers: Evaluation of an introductory course in occupational health and safety in Norway. Safety Science. 2018; 109: 368–376. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.020.
TEAGASC. Agriculture and Food Development Authority (Teagasc).
SEGES. Danish agricultural knowledge and innovation centre.
Rommetvedt H, Veggeland F. Parliamentary Government and Corporatism at the Crossroads: Principals and Agents in Norwegian Agricultural Policymaking. Gov & oppos. 2019; 54(4): 661–685. doi: 10.1017/gov.2017.32.
EC Progress report, North Macedonia. 2019. (access: 2020.10.12).
National Strategy for occupational safety and health 2020, OG No 115/17. (access: 2020.10.12).
Velkovski ?. Occupational safety and health – Study of Macedonia (Project – Increasing Capacities and Strengthening of the Role of the Regional CSOS for Improvement of the Labor Conditions and Dialogue with Public Institutions). 2018. Macedonian Occupational Safety and Health Association, Skopje.
Guidelines for dairy production – (access: 2021.05.08).
The Irish Health and Safety authority – (access: 2021.05.08).
Pinzke S, Alwall Svennefelt C, Lundqvist P. Occupational injuries in Swedish agriculture: development and preventive actions. J Agric Saf Health. 2018; 24(4): 355–373.
Svendsen K, Aas O, Hilt B. Nonfatal occupational injuries in norwegian farmers. Saf Health Work. 2014; 5(3): 147–151. doi: 10.1016/
McNamara J, Griffin P, Phelan J, Field W, Kinsella J. Farm health and safety adoption through engineering and behaviour change. Agron Res. 2019; 17(5): 1953–1959. doi: 10.15159/AR.19.151.