RESEARCH PAPER
Nutritional behaviours of pregnant women in rural and urban environments
Edyta Suliga 1  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(3):513–517
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
Monitoring of the environmental differences in the mode of nutrition is especially important in pregnant women, for whom normal body weight gain is especially important for both the course of pregnancy and the normal development of the foetus, and is inseparably associated with rational nutrition.

Objective:
The objective of the study was evaluation of the mode of nutrition of pregnant women according to the place of residence.

Material and Methods:
The investigation comprised 704 women. Information was collected by means of an anonymous survey concerning place of residence, consumption of selected products and beverages, and taking folic acid and other vitamin and/or mineral dietary supplements.

Results:
In the urban environment, pregnant women more frequently consumed vegetables, milk and dairy products, sea fish and wholemeal cereal products, drank more liquids, as well as more fruit and/or vegetable juices, and more often used the supplementation with folic acid, even before becoming pregnant. No significant differences were found in the consumption of fruits, pulses, products which are the source of complete proteins, confectionery products and sweets, according to the place of residence.

Conclusions:
The diet of pregnant women from the rural environment compared to that of women from urban areas, was characterized by worse quality. It is necessary to carry out health education in the area of adequate nutrition among pregnant women, and those who plan pregnancy, directed primarily to all women from the rural environment.

 
REFERENCES (27):
1. Desmukh-Taskar P, Nicklas TA, Yang SJ, Berenson GS. Does food group consumption vary by differences in socioeconomic, demographic, and lifestyle factors in young adults? The Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107: 223–234.
2. Mullie P, Clarys P, Hulens M, Vanasant G. Dietary patterns and socioeconomic position. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010; 64: 231–238.
3. Boylan S, Lallukka T, Lahelma E, Pikhart H, Malyutina S, Pajak A, et al. Socio-economic circumstances and food habits in Eastern, Central and Western European populations. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14: 678–687.
4. Kriaucioniene V, Klumbiene J, Petkeviciene J, Sakyte E. Time trends in social differences in nutrition habits of a Lithuanian population: 1994–2010. BMC Public Health 2012; 21: 218. doi: 10.1186/1471–2458–12–218.
5. Monsivas P, Aggarwal A, Drewnowski A. Are socio-economic disparities in diet quality explained by diet cost? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012; 66: 530–535.
6. Lutfivva MN, Chang LF, Lipsky MS. A cross-sectional study of US rural adults’ consumption of fruits and vegetables: do they consume at least five servings daily? BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 280. doi: 10.1186/1471–2458–12–280.
7. Tsigga M, Filis V, Hatzopoulou K, Kotzamanidis C, Grammatikopoulou MG. Healthy Eating Index during pregnancy according to pre-gravid and gravid weight status. Publ Health Nutr. 2011; 14: 290–296. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010001989.
8. Cesani MF, Garraza M, Bergel Sanchis ML, Luis MA, Torres MF, Quintero FA, et al. A comparative study on nutritional status and body composition of urban and rural schoolchildren from Brandsen district (Argentina). PLoS One. 2013; 8: e52792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052792.
9. Krzyczycha R, Szponar B. Body mass index (BMI) and dietary preferences of women living in rural areas. Ann Nat Inst Hyg. 2009; 60: 75–77.
10. Social Diagnosis 2011. Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Poland. Czapiński J, Panek T (Eds). The Council for Social Monitoring, Warsaw 2012.
11. Wojtyła A, Bojar I, Boyle P, Zatoński W, Marcinkowski JT, Biliński P. Nutritional behaviours among pregnant women from rural and urban environments in Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18: 169–174.
12. Suliburska J, Bogdański P, Duda G, Pupek-Musialik D, Piątek J, Żukiewicz-Sobczak W. An assessment of dietary intake and state of nutritional in hypertensive patients from rural and urban areas of Greater Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19: 339–343.
13. Szostak-Węgierek D, Cichocka A. Żywienie kobiet w ciąży. PZWL, Warsaw, 2005 (in Polish).
14. Shieve LA, Cogswell ME, Scanlon KS, Perry G, Ferre C, Blackmore-Prince C. Prepregnancy body mass index and pregnancy weight gain: association with preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 96: 194 -200.
15. Borkowski W, Mielniczuk H. Preterm delivery in relation to combined pregnancy weight gain and prepregnancy body mass. Przegl Epidemiol. 2007; 61: 577–584.
16. Sontrop JM, Campell MK, Evers SE, Speechley KN, Avison WR. Fish consumption among pregnant women in London, Ontario: associations with socio-demographic and health and lifestyle factors. Can J Pub Health. 2007; 98: 389–394.
17. Northstone K, Emmett P, Rogers I. Dietary patterns in pregnancy and associations with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008; 62: 471–479.
18. Suliga E. Nutritional behaviours of pregnant women. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabet Metab 2011; 17: 76–81.
19. Suliga E. Economic and social factors and the quality of nutrition of pregnant women. Med St. 2013; 29: 160–166.
20. Fowles ER, Bryant M, Kim SH. Predictors of dietary quality in low-income pregnant women: a path analysis. Nurs Res. 2011; 60: 286–294.
21. Ebrahimi F, Shariff ZM, Rezaeian M, Tabatabaei SZ, Mun CY, Tajik E. Socioeconomic status and intake of energy and sodium are associated with calcium intake among pregnant women in Rafsanjan city. Iran. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013; 39: 146–153.
22. Wojtyła C, Biliński P, Paprzycki P, Warzocha K. Haematological parameters in postpartum women and their babies in Poland – comparison of urban and rural areas. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18: 380–385.
23. Kirschner H, Kosińska I, Narojek L. Changes in nutritional behavior in Poland in the nineties. Pol J Publ Health. 2002; 112: 313–319.
24. Raport z analizy danych ankietowych pochodzących z badania: Zachowania zdrowotne kobiet w ciąży. Warszawa, Główny Inspektorat Sanitarny, 2009 (in Polish).
25. Wojtyła A, Kapka-Skrzypczak L, Diatczyk J, Fronczak A, Paprzycki P. Alcohol-related Developmental Origin of Adult Health – population studies in Poland among mothers and newborns (2010–2012). Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19: 365–377.
26. Skagerstróm J, Chang G, Nilsen P. Predictors of drinking during pregnancy: a systematic review. J Women’s Health 2011; 20: 901–913.
27. Ehmke vel Emczyńska E, Bebelska K, Czerwonogrodzka-Senczyna A. The importance of dietary counseling in the prevention of complications of pregnancy. Med News. 2012; 81: 273–280.
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966