RESEARCH PAPER
Inequalities in breast cancer incidence and stage distribution between urban and rural female population in Świętokrzyskie Province, Poland
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Ergonomics, Medical University, Bialystok, Poland
2
Department of Public Health, Medical University, Bialystok, Poland
3
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Witold Chodźko Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
4
Department of Medical Anthropology, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Dominik Maślach   

Department of Public Health, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2019;26(1):159–164
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
One of the main factors determining the burden of breast cancer is the effectiveness of measures taken to combat this cancer including urban-rural differences. The aim of the study was to analyse the differences in breast cancer incidence and disease stage distribution among urban and rural women in the Świętokrzyskie Province as a part of a strategy for breast cancer control.

Material and methods:
The study of disease stage distribution included 483 female residents of Świętokrzyskie Province who were diagnosed in 2013 with invasive breast cancer, and reported to Świętokrzyskie Office for Cancer Registration. Urban-rural differences in breast cancer incidence in 2002–2013 were presented using Range Ratio (RR). Changes in incidence trends in urban and rural areas were analysed using joinpoint models. Annual Percentage Change (APC) of the rates was calculated for each time trend.

Results:
Breast cancer incidence rate in the urban female population was higher than in rural women with RR, amounting to 1.43. However, the analysis of trends showed that the pace and direction of change were developing negatively among inhabitants of rural areas. In 2002–2013, in rural women, the age-standardized rate (ASR) values increased by 2.8% per year (p<0.05). The course of ASR trends showed statistically significant urban-rural differences (p=0.004). Analysis of urban-rural differences in disease stage distribution revealed a non-significantly higher proportion of cases with localised stage in urban than in rural areas, amounting to 51.0% and 43.9%, respectively.

Conclusions:
Existing health inequalities indicate the need to intensify activities in rural areas and should be the starting point for making key decisions in combating breast cancer.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research was financed under Project ERA-NET TRANSCAN 1/2015, financed by the National Centre for Research and Development in Warsaw, pursuant to Decision No. DZP/TRANSCAN III/168/2015.
 
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Torre L.A, Bray F, Siegel R.L, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65: 87–1083.
 
2.
Micheli A, Capocaccia R, Martinez C, et al. Cancer control in Europe: a proposed set of European cancer health indicators. Eur J Public Health. 2003; 13, suppl. 3: 116–118.
 
3.
Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 4 August 2016 on the National Health Program for 2016–2020. Dz. U. z 2016 r. poz. 1492.
 
4.
Ahmad O, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez A, Murray C, Lozano R, Inoue M. GPE Discussion Paper Series: no31. Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. World Health Organization, 2001.
 
5.
Silman AJ, Macfarlane GJ. Epidemiological studies: A practical guide. Second edition: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
 
6.
International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition, First Revision. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013.
 
7.
European Network Of Cancer Registries (ENCR): ENCR Recommendations, Condensed TNM for Coding the Extent of Disease, April 2002.
 
8.
National Cancer Institute. Joinpoint Regression Program. version 4.2.0.2, June 23 2015, (Available at http://surveillance.cancer.gov...).
 
9.
Breen N, Scott S, Percy-Laurry A, Lewis D, Glasgow R. Health disparities calculator: a methodologically rigorous tool for analyzing inequalities in population health. Am J Public Health 2014; 104(9): 1589–91.
 
10.
National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Surveillance Research Program and Applied Research Program. Health Disparities Calculator, Version 1.2.4 2013.
 
11.
Wojtyniak B, Rabczenko D, Pokarowski P, et al. Atlas of mortality of the Polish population in 1999–2001 and 2008–2010 – online edition; www.atlas.pzh.gov.pl.
 
12.
Lipowicz A. Disparities in health status between rural and urban adult males in Lower Silesia, Poland. Anthropol Anz. 2015; 72(1): 13–25.
 
13.
Maniecka – Bryła I, Pikala M, Bryła M. Health inequalities among rural and urban inhibitants of Łódż province, Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(4): 723–731.
 
14.
Staszewski J.Regional differences in mortality from malignant tumors in Poland in 1970–1974.Gliwice: Instytut Onkologii; 1979.
 
15.
Zatoński W, Tyczyński J. Cancer in Poland. Cancer Detect Prev. 1993; 17(4–5): 459–68.
 
16.
Staszewski J. Regional differences in mortality from malignant tumors in Poland in 1975–1976. Polski Tygodnik Lekarski 1981; 36(2): 49–51.
 
17.
Staszewski J. Regional differences in mortality from malignant tumors in Poland in 1961 and 1970–1971. Nowotwory 1975; 25(2): 187–192.
 
18.
Wojtyniak B, Rabczenko D, Pokarowski P, et al. Atlas of mortality of the Polish population in 1999–2001 and 2008–2010 – online edition; www.atlas.pzh.gov.pl.
 
19.
Didkowska J, Wojciechowska U. Breast cancer in Poland and Europe – population and statistics. Nowotwory. J Oncol. 2013; 63(2): 111–118.
 
20.
Koszarowski T, Gadomska H, Warda B, Drożdżewska Z. Research on cancer incidence and mortality in Poland and in selected areas 1962–1965. Polish Medical Publishers, Warsaw; 1968.
 
21.
Korfel A, Korfel Y, Juczewska M, Szachidewicz J, Rybaczuk M. Mammary carcinoma in the urban and rural populations of the north-eastern region. Materials of the 6th Scientific Congress of Physicians of the Białystok, Łomża and Suwałki.1986 February 7; Białystok; Poland.
 
22.
Mahdavifar N, Pakzad R, Ghoncheh M, Pakzad I, Moudi A, Salehiniya H. Spatial analysis of breast cancer in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016; 17(S3): 59–64.
 
23.
Mathew A, Kalavathy MC, George PS, Jagathnath Krishna KM and Sebastian P. Urban-Rural Disparities in Female Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Trivandrum, South India. Ann Transl Med Epidemiol. 2017; 4(1): 1011.
 
24.
Lundqvist A, Andersson E, Ahlberg I, Nilbert M, Gerdtham U. Socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer incidence and mortality in Europe – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pub Health. 2016; 26(5): 804–813.
 
25.
Central Statistical Office, Statistical Office In Olsztyn. Rural areas in Poland, Warszawa, Olsztyn, 2011.
 
26.
Fei X, Wu J, Kong Z, Christakos G. Urban-Rural Disparity of Breast Cancer and Socioeconomic Risk Factors in China. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2): e0117572.
 
27.
Central Statistical Office. Statistical yearbook of the Świętokrzyskie Voivodship, Kielce, 2017.
 
28.
Khalis M, Charbotel B, Chajès V, Rinaldi S, Moskal A, Biessy C, et al. Menstrual and reproductive factors and risk of breast cancer: A case-control study in the Fez region, Morocco. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13(1): e0191333.
 
29.
Krzyzak M, Maslach D, Juczewska M, Lasota W, Rabczenko D, Marcinkowski J, Szpak A. Differences in breast cancer incidence and stage distribution between urban and rural female population in Podlaskie Voivodship, Poland in years 2001–2002. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2010; 17(1): 159–62.
 
30.
Minelli L, Stracci F, Cassetti T, et al. Urban-rural differences in gynaecological cancer occurrence in a Central Region of Italy: 1978–1982 and 1998–2002. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2007: 28(6): 468–72.
 
31.
Harding C, Pompei F, Burmistrov D, Welch HG, Abebe R, Wilson R. Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, and Mortality Across US Counties. JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175(9): 1483–1489.
 
32.
Morris E, Feig SA, Drexler M, Lehman C. Implications of Overdiagnosis: Impact on Screening Mammography Practices. Popul Health Manag. 2015; 18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S3–11.
 
33.
Houssami N. Overdiagnosis of breast cancer in population screening: does it make breast screening worthless? Cancer Biol Med. 2017; 14(1):1–8.
 
34.
Moss JL, Liu B, Feuer EJ. Urban/Rural Differences in Breast and Cervical Cancer Incidence: The Mediating Roles of Socioeconomic Status and Provider Density. Womens Health Issues. 2017; 27(6): 683–691.
 
35.
Jokiel M, Bielska-Lasota M, Kraszewska E: Breast cancer prevention – awareness and health beheviour changes of women in 1998–2002. Przegl Epidemiol. 2003; 3, 521–530.
 
36.
Stamenić V, Strnad M. Urban-rural differences in a population-based breast cancer screening program in Croatia. Croat Med J. 2011; 52(1): 76–86.
 
37.
MacKinnon JA, Duncan RC, Huang Y, et al. Detecting an association between socioeconomic status and late stage breast cancer using spatial analysis and area-based measures. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16(4): 756–762.
 
38.
Nikolaidis Ch, Guimarães RM, Constantinidis TC. Rural/urban disparities in cancer mortality: a case – study from northeast Greece. Cad Saude Colet 2012; 20(3): 336–340.
 
39.
Yu XQ. Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer survival: relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment and race. BMC Cancer. 2009; 9:364.
 
40.
McLafferty S, Wang F, Luo L, Butler J. Rural-urban inequalities in late-stage breast cancer: spatial and social dimensions of risk and access. Environ Plann B Plann Des. 2011; 38(4): 726–740.
 
41.
Pruitt SL, Eberth JM, Morris ES, Grinsfelder DB, Cuate EL. Rural-Urban Differences in Late-Stage Breast Cancer: Do Associations Differ by Rural-Urban Classification System? Tex Public Health J. 2015; 67(2): 19–27.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966