RESEARCH PAPER
Interpersonal correlates of the tendency to seek help in the situation of indebtedness in healthy people and in patients with impaired mobility, related to chronic disorders of the locomotor system – Pilot study
1
Department of General and Neuro Rehabilitation, Witold Chodźko Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
2
University of Economics and Innovation, Lublin, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2019;26(4):630-635
KEYWORDS
debtintrapersonal functioningseeking helpmobility impairmentchronic disorders of the locomotor systemhealthy persons
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The way of functioning in everyday life and the style of coping with the challenges encountered, including the situations of financial difficulties, are shaped by various adaptation mechanisms conditioned by the state of psychophysical health, as well as social and cultural factors. They are related to the intrapsychic features, among which the personality plays a key role.
Material and methods:
The research sample consisted of 2 groups – 50 patients with mobility impairment resulting from chronic pathologies of the locomotor system hospitalized in the Department of General and Neuro Rehabilitation, Institute of Rural Health in Lublin, and 50 healthy people. The research was carried out using the NEO-FFI Personality Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale, Self-Esteem Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Impulsiveness Inventory and the APSZ Questionnaire.
Results:
In the group of patients with impaired mobility resulting from chronic pathologies of the locomotor system, the leading correlate of the tendency to seek help in the situation of indebtedness was extraversion. In the healthy group, the leading correlates of the tendency to undertake this type of activity were the intensity of perceived stress, neuroticism, self-esteem, self- efficacy and empathy.
Conclusions:
In the group of patients with impaired mobility resulting from chronic diseases of the locomotor system, extroversion was the factor conducive to seeking help in the situation of indebtedness. In the group of healthy people, self-esteem, self- efficacy and empathy were the factors conducive to taking such actions, whereas intensity of perceived stress and neuroticism were the risk factors.
The way of functioning in everyday life and the style of coping with the challenges encountered, including the situations of financial difficulties, are shaped by various adaptation mechanisms conditioned by the state of psychophysical health, as well as social and cultural factors. They are related to the intrapsychic features, among which the personality plays a key role.
Material and methods:
The research sample consisted of 2 groups – 50 patients with mobility impairment resulting from chronic pathologies of the locomotor system hospitalized in the Department of General and Neuro Rehabilitation, Institute of Rural Health in Lublin, and 50 healthy people. The research was carried out using the NEO-FFI Personality Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale, Self-Esteem Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Impulsiveness Inventory and the APSZ Questionnaire.
Results:
In the group of patients with impaired mobility resulting from chronic pathologies of the locomotor system, the leading correlate of the tendency to seek help in the situation of indebtedness was extraversion. In the healthy group, the leading correlates of the tendency to undertake this type of activity were the intensity of perceived stress, neuroticism, self-esteem, self- efficacy and empathy.
Conclusions:
In the group of patients with impaired mobility resulting from chronic diseases of the locomotor system, extroversion was the factor conducive to seeking help in the situation of indebtedness. In the group of healthy people, self-esteem, self- efficacy and empathy were the factors conducive to taking such actions, whereas intensity of perceived stress and neuroticism were the risk factors.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Senthelal S, Thomas MA. Arthritis. Treasure Island (FL) StatPearls Publishing, 2018.
2.
Stanisławska-Biernat E, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A. [Treatment of osteoarthritis]. Przew Lek GPs. 2005; 7(11): 62–70. (in Polish).
3.
O’Neill TW, Felson DT. Mechanisms of Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s11914-018-0477-1.
4.
Segal NA, Glass NA. Is quadriceps muscle weakness a risk factor for incident or progressive knee osteoarthritis? Phys Sportsmed. 2011; 39(4): 44–50.
5.
Semanik PA, Chang RW, Dunlop DD. Aerobic activity in prevention and symptom control of osteoarthritis. PM R. 2012; 4(5 Suppl): S37–44.
6.
Tuszyńska-Bogucka W, Saran T, Jurkowska B, Dziaduch W. Psychosocial generalised resistance resources and clinical indicators of patients suffering from osteoarthritis at the Institute of Rural Health in Lublin, Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015; 22(2): 380–4.
7.
Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R. The Epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010; 24(6): 769–81.
8.
Andersson GBJ. Epidemiology of low back pain. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998; 69(sup281): 28–31.
9.
Wojtczak A. [Public health- a challenge for 21st century health systems].Warsaw. PZWL, 2017. (in Polish).
10.
Dwornik M, Białoszewski D, Kiebzak W, Lyp M. The correlation of selected physical examination findings and the efficacy of physiotherapy for chronic lumbosacral pain. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007; 9(3): 297–309.
11.
Parent-Thirion A, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Fourth European working conditions survey. Luxembourg Office for Offical Publ. of the European Communities, 2007.
12.
Hall CS, Linzey G, Campbell JB. [Theories of personality]. Warszawa, PWN, 2006. (in Polish).
13.
McCrae RR, Costa PT. A five-factor theory of personality. In: John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA, editors. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. Guilford, New York; 2008. p. 159–181.
14.
Goldberg LR. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment. 1992; 4: 26–42.
16.
Costa PT, McCrae RR. Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. J Personality Soc Psychol. 1980; 38: 668–678.
17.
Watson D, Clark LA. Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience negative affective states. Psychological Bulletin. 1984; 96: 465–490.
18.
Makowska H, Poprawa R. [Stress coping strategies in health development]. In: Dolińska-Zygmunt G, editor. [An introduction to health psychology]. Wrocław University, Wrocław; 2001. p. 71–102.
19.
Watson D, Pennebaker JW. Health complaints, stress, and distress: exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychol Rev. 1989; 96: 234–254.
20.
Bogg T, Roberts BW. Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: a metaanalysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin. 2004; 130: 887–919.
21.
Heszen-Niejodek I. Emotions: cognitive appraisal and coping strategies. In: Heszen-Niejodek I, editor. [Theoretical and clinical aspects of coping with psychological stress]. Association of Psychology and Architecture, Poznań; 2002. p. 174–197. (in Polish).
22.
Ogińska-Bulik, N. [Stress and coping]. In: Bielawska-Batorowicz E, editor, [Introduction to psychology for economists]. PWE, Warszawa; 2012. (in Polish).
23.
Juczyński Z. (2000), [Self-efficacy: theory and i measurement]. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Psychologica. 2000; 4: 11–23. (in Polish).
25.
Mahoney FI, Barthel, D. Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965; 14: 61–65.
26.
Zawadzki B, Strelau J, Szczepaniak P, Śliwińska M. NEO-FFI. [Personality Inventory Paul. Costa Jr and Robart R. McCrae. Polish adaptation]. Warsaw Psychological Test Laboratory of the Polish Psychological Association, 2010. (in Polish).
27.
Juczyński Z, Ogińska-Bulik N. [Assessment and Diagnostic Instruments for Health Psychology Promotion]. Warsaw Psychological Test Laboratory of the Polish Psychological Association, 2009. (in Polish).
28.
Dzwonkowska I, Lachowicz-Tabaczak K, Łaguna M. [SES – self-assessment and its measurement. Polish adaptation of the SES M. Rosenberg scale]. Warszawa Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych, 2008. (in Polish).
29.
Juczyński Z. [Assessment and Diagnostic Instruments for Health Psychology Promotion]. Warsaw Psychological Test Laboratory of the Polish Psychological Association, 2009. (in Polish).
30.
Jaworowska A, [IVE. Impulsiveness Inventory. Impulsiveness. Venturesomeness Empathy]. Warsaw Psychological Test Laboratory of the Polish Psychological Association, 2011. (in Polish).
31.
Brown S, Taylor K. Household Finances and the ‘’Big Five’’.Great Britain Sheffield University of Sheffield, 2011.
32.
Caliendo M, Fossen F, Kritikos A. Personality Characteristics and the Decision to Become and Stay Self-Employed. Germany Berlin DIW, 2011.
33.
Borghans LAL, Duckworth AL, Heckman JJ, terWeel B. The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits. J Human Res. 2008; 43(4): 972–1059.
34.
Elbogen EB, Tiegreen J, Vaughan C, Bradford D. W. Money management, mental health, and psychiatric disability: A recovery-oriented model for improving financial skills. Psych Rehab J. 2011; 34(3): 223–231.
35.
Kim J, Garman ET, Sorhaindo B. Relationships Among Credit Counseling Clients’ Financial Well-Being. Financial Behaviors, Financial Stress Events and Health. Financial Counselling and Planning. 2003; 14: 75–87.
36.
Balmer N, Pleasence P, Buck A, Walker H. Worried Sick: The Experience of Debt Problems and their Relationship with Health, Illness and Disability. Social Policy and Society. 2006; 5(1): 39–51.
37.
Allmark P, Machaczek K. Financial capability, health and disability. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 243.
38.
Howlett E, Kees J, Kemp E. The role of self-regulation, future orientation, and financial knowledge in long-term financial decisions. J Cons Aff. 2008; 42: 223–242.
39.
Burke-Miller JK, Swarbrick MA, Carter TM, Jonikas JA, Zipple AM, Fraser VV, Cook JA. Promoting self-determination and financial security through innovative asset building approaches. Psych Rehab J. 2010; 34: 104–112.
40.
Jiménez-Solomon O G, Méndez-Bustos P, Swarbrick M, Díaz S, Silva S, Kelley M, Lewis-Fernández R. Peer-supported economic empowerment: A financial wellness intervention framework for people with psychiatric disabilities. Psych Rehab J. 2016; 39: 222–233.
41.
Delaney L, Harmon C, Ryan M. The role of noncognitive traits in undergraduate study behaviours. Econ Edu Rev. 2013; 32: 181–195.
42.
Daly M, Delaney L, McManus S. Risk Attitudes as an Independent. Predictor of Debt. Dublin UCD Geary Institute Discussion Paper Series, 2010.
43.
Agarwal S, Mazumder B. Cognitive abilities and household financial decision making. Am Econ J: App Econ. 2013; 5(1): 193–207.
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
