0.829
IF
20
MNiSW
166.26
ICV
RESEARCH PAPER
 
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
 
 

Dust exposure and health of workers in duck hatcheries

Sylvie Martin 1,  
Julie Puterflam 2, 3,  
Sophie Le Bouquin 3, 4,  
 
1
SEPIA-Sante, 31 rue de Pontivy, 56150 Baud, France
2
ITAVI, 41 rue de Beaucemaine, 22440 Ploufragan, France
3
Sanivol, Zoopôle Beaucemaine, 22440 Ploufragan, France
4
ANSES – Ploufragan-Plouzané Laboratory, BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France
Ann Agric Environ Med 2017;24(3):360–365
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
Objectives:
The objectives of this cross-sectional study were to investigate dust exposure and respiratory health of workers in duck hatcheries in western France.

Material and Methods:
Ninety volunteer workers, who work in sorting rooms and/or incubation rooms, participated in exposure assessments and medical examinations. Medical examinations were performed by occupational health practitioners.They filled-in a questionnaire with the workers, followed by a lung function test on each worker. General characteristics and prevalence of chronic respiratory symptoms were described in each type of working rooms. Associations between symptoms and exposure (working room or dust level) were studied in GEE multivariate models.

Results:
Overall prevalence of chronic respiratory symptoms (cough, phlegm) and chronic bronchitis were similar or lower than in the reference population. However, prevalence of these symptoms was higher for those working in sorting rooms, that were associated with an increased risk of respiratory symptoms and decreased lung function. Respirable dust was also significantly associated with an increased risk of respiratory symptoms. The prevalence of asthma and rhinitis were well above those in the reference population, but did not vary among working rooms. Descriptive data suggested an occupational origin for some cases.

Conclusions:
Hatchery workers were at increased risk of compromised respiratory health due to dust exposure, particularly those who work in sorting rooms. Asthma and rhinitis were in excess in this population of workers. Thorough clinical examination of these workers should be performed and all exposures assessed.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Marie-Thérèse Guillam   
SEPIA-Sante, 31 rue de Pontivy, 56150 Baud, France
 
REFERENCES (29):
1. Donham KJ, Reynolds SJ, Whitten P, Merchant JA, Burmeister L, Popendorf WJ. Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: dose-response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function. Am J Ind Med. 1995; 27: 405–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700270309.
2. Donham KJ, Cumro D, Reynolds SJ, Merchant JA. Dose-response relationships between occupational aerosol exposures and cross-shift declines of lung function in poultry workers: recommendations for exposure limits. J Occup Environ Med. 2000; 42: 260–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200003000-00006.
3. Radon K, Monso E, Weber C, Danuser B, Iversen M, Opravil U, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for airway diseases in farmers-summary of results of the European farmers’project. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2002; 9: 207–213.
4. Radon K, Danuser B, Iversen M, Monso E, Weber C, Hartung J, et al. Air contaminants in different European farming environments. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2002; 9: 41–8.
5. Eduard W, Pearce N, Douwes J. Chronic bronchitis, COPD, and lung function in farmers: the role of biological agents. Chest. 2009; 136: 716–25. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-2192.
6. Simpson JC, Niven RM, Pickering CA, Oldham LA, Fletcher AM, Francis HC. Comparative personal exposures to organic dusts and endotoxin. Ann Occup Hyg. 1999; 43: 107–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4878(98)00083-0.
7. MSA, 2007. BIMSA N° 76, August September 2007.
8. Tymczyna L, Chmielowiec-Korzeniowska A, Drabik A. The effectiveness of various biofiltration substrates in removing bacteria, endotoxins, and dust from ventilation system exhaust from a chicken hatchery. Poult Sci. 2007; 86: 2095–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.10.2095.
9. Skórska C, Mackiewicz B, Golec M, Cholewa G, Chmielowiec-Korzeniowska A, Dutkiewicz J. Health effects of exposure to organic dust in workers of a modern hatchery. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2007; 14: 341–5.
10. Martin E, Ernst S, Lotz G, Linsel G, Jäckel U. Microbial exposure and respiratory dysfunction in poultry hatchery workers. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2013; 15: 478–84. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30758h.
11. Martin E, Jäckel U. Characterisation of bacterial contaminants in the air of a duck hatchery by cultivation based and molecular methods. J Environ Monit. 2011; 13: 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0em00272k.
12. Zhelev G, Lyutzkanov M, Urumova V, Mihaylov G, Petrov V, Marutsov P. Microbial contamination in a duck hatchery. Revue Méd. Vét. 2012; 163: 319–322.
13. OSHA. Occupational Exposure Limits. 2012. Available at: https://www.osha.gov/dts/chemicalsampling/data/CH_259635.html. Accessed on 10/23/2016.
14. Huchon G, Vergnenègre A, Neukirch F, Brami G, Roche N, Preux PM. Chronic bronchitis among French adults: high prevalence and underdiagnosis. Eur Respir J. 2002; 20: 806–812. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.02.00042002.
15. Fuhrman C, Roche N,Vergnenegre A, Chouaid C, Zureik M, Delmas MC. [Bronchite chronique: prévalence et impact sur la vie quotidienne. Analyse des données de l’enquête de santé Insee 2002–2003]. Saint-Maurice. Institut de veille sanitaire, février 2008, 37p.
16. Delmas MC, Leynaert B, Ruelle L, Annesi Maesano I, Herbert JB, Fuhrman C. [Asthme: prévalence et impact sur la vie quotidienne. Analyse des données de l’enquête décennale santé 2003 de l’Insee]. Saint- Maurice: Institut de veille sanitaire; 2008, 89p.
17. Radon K, Danuser B, Iversen M, Jörres R, Monso E, Opravil U, et al. Respiratory symptoms in European animal farmers. Eur Respir J. 2001; 17: 747–54. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.01.17407470.
18. Radon K, Weber C, Iversen M, Danuser B, Pedersen S, Nowak D. Exposure assessment and lung function in pig and poultry farmers. Occup Environ Med. 2001; 58: 405–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.6.405.
19. Dalphin JC, Dubiez A, Monnet E, Gora D, Westeel V, Pernet D, et al. Prevalence of asthma and respiratory symptoms in dairy farmers in the French province of the Doubs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998; 158: 1493–8. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9709108.
20. Beck F, Guignard R, Richard JB, Wilquin JL, Peretti-Watel P. [Une augmentation du tabagisme confirmée en France]. La Santé de l’homme, INPES. 2011, vol. 411, p 9–10.
21. Guillam MT, Pédrono G, Le Bouquin S, Huneau A, Gaudon J, Leborgne R, et al. Chronic respiratory symptoms of poultry farmers and model-based estimates of long-term dust exposure. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013; 20: 307–11.
22. Lembke B, Janson C, Norback D, Rask-Andersen A. High risk of adult-onset asthma and work-related wheeze in farmers despite low prevalence of asthma in young farmers. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004; 8: 1285–91.
23. Dalphin JC. [In the agricultural environment there is asthma and asthma… or the paradox of agricultural asthma]. Rev Mal Respir. 2007; 24: 1083–6.
24. Afrite A, Allonier C, Com-Ruelle L, Le Guen N. [L’asthme en France en 2006: prévalence, contrôle et déterminants.] Rapport n° 549, 118p. IRDES 2011.
25. Bauchau V, Durham SR. Prevalence and rate of diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in Europe. Eur Respir J. 2004; 24: 758–64.
26. Ameille J, Hamelin K, Andujar P, Bensefa-Colas L, Bonneterre V, Dupas D, et al. Occupational asthma and occupational rhinitis: the united airways disease model revisited. Occup Environ Med. 2013; 70: 471–5.
27. Omland O. Exposure and respiratory health in farming in temperate zones--a review of the literature. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2002; 9: 119–36.
28. Vogelzang PF, van der Gulden JW, Folgering H, Heederik D, Tielen MJ, van Schayck CP. Longitudinal changes in bronchial responsiveness associated with swine confinement dust exposure. Chest. 2000; 117: 1488–95.
29. Preller L, Heederik D, Boleij JS, Vogelzang PF, Tielen MJ. Lung function and chronic respiratory symptoms of pig farmers: focus on exposure to endotoxins and ammonia and use of disinfectants. Occup Environ Med. 1995; 52: 654–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.52.10.654.
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966