VARIA
The influence of architecture, design and physical environment in residential buildings on cardiovascular disease – rationale and protocol for an overview of systematic reviews
1
Chair of Urbanism and City Structure, Faculty of Architecture, University of Technology, Kraków, Poland
2
Department of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków; College of Family Physicians in Poland, Warsaw, Poland
3
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Opole; College of Family Physicians in Poland, Warsaw, Poland
Corresponding author
Tomasz Tomasik
Department of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow and the College of Family Physicians in Poland, Warsaw, Poland
Department of Family Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow and the College of Family Physicians in Poland, Warsaw, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2023;30(2):376-383
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and Objective. Architecture and design solutions profile the environment and living conditions in residential housing and may have an impact on health. The aim of the study was to summarise all published systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analysis (MAs), which assess the effect on cardiovascular disease (CVD) of the architecture, design and physical environment in residential buildings.
Materials and method. This study presents the rationale and protocol of an overview of SRs. It was prepared according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Four bibliographical databases will be searched. Eligible SRs can include RCTs, quasi-RCTs and observational studies.
Results and Summery. The expected results of the completed overview of SRs will comprehensively summarise evidence concerning the influence of residential environment on cardiovascular health. This might be of importance to physicians, architects, public health professionals and politicians.
REFERENCES (51)
1.
WHO. What are the determinants of health. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/... (access: 2023.03.01).
2.
Theron LC, Abreu-Villaça Y, Augusto-Oliveira M, et al. A systematic review of the mental health risks and resilience among pollution-exposed adolescents. J Psychiatr Res. 2022;146:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsy....
3.
Niu Z, Liu F, Yu H, et al. Association between exposure to ambient air ollution and hospital admission, incidence, and mortality of stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 23 million participants. Environ Health Prev Med. 2021;26(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199....
4.
Saleh S, Shepherd W, Jewell C, et al. Air pollution interventions and respiratory health: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020;24(2):150–164. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.....
5.
Gundry S, Wright J, Conroy R. A systematic review of the health outcomes related to household water quality in developing countries. J Water Health. 2004;2(1):1–13.
6.
Farooqi ZUR, Ahmad I, Ditta A, Ilic P, et al. Types, sources, socioeconomic impacts, and control strategies of environmental noise: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;29(54):81087–81111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356....
7.
Bożejko M, Tarski I, Małodobra-Mazur M. Outdoor artificial light at night and human health: A review of epidemiological studies. Environ Res. 2023;218:115049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envr....
8.
Moore ChW. Architecture: Art and Science. J Architect Educ. 1965;19:53–56.
9.
Troiani I, Ewing S, Periton D. Architecture and culture: architecture’s disciplinarity. Architect Culture. 2013;1:6–19.
10.
Sauvé JS, Mongeon P, Lariviere V. From art to science: A bibliometric analysis of architectural scholarly production from 1980 to 2015. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0276840. https://doi.org/10.1371/journa....
11.
Mendes MM, Sá T, Cabral J (eds.) Architecture and the Social Sciences: Inter- and Multidisciplinary Approaches between Society and Space. Springer 2017.
12.
Kembel SW, Jones E, Kline J, et al. Architectural design influences the diversity and structure of the built environment microbiome. ISME J. 2012;6:1469–1479.
14.
Cavanaugh WJ, Farrell WR, Hirtle PW, et al. Speech Privacy in Buildings. J Acoustical Soc Am. 1962;34:475–492.
15.
McIntyre MH. A Literature Review of the Social, Economic and Environmental Impact of Architecture and Design. Scottish Executive Social Research 2006. Available from: https://www.culturehive.co.uk/... (access: 2023.03.01).
16.
Shah RC, Kesan JP. How architecture regulates. J Architect Planning Res. 2007;24:350–359.
17.
Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.
18.
Timmis A, Vardas P, Townsend N, et al. European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021: Executive Summary. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022;8(4):377–382. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac014.
19.
Piepoli MF, Abreu A, Albus C, et al. Update on cardiovascular prevention in clinical practice: A position paper of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(2):181–205. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/2047487319893035.
20.
Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(34):3227–3337. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484.
21.
Münzel T, Hahad O, Sorensen M, et al. Environmental risk factors and cardiovascular diseases: a comprehensive expert review. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(14):2880–2902. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/cvr/cvab316.
22.
Burnett RT, Pope CA 3rd, Ezzati M, et al. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(4):397–403. https://doi.org/ 10.1289/ehp.1307049.
23.
Vrijheid M. The exposome: a new paradigm to study the impact of environment on health. Thorax. 2014;69(9):876–878. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204949.
24.
Prüss-Ustün A, Wolf J, Corvalán C, Neville T, et al. Diseases due to unhealthy environments: an updated estimate of the global burden of disease attributable to environmental determinants of health. J Public Health (Oxf). 2017;39(3):464–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed....
25.
GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1923–1994. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6.
26.
Lee KK, Bing R, Kiang J, et al. Adverse health effects associated with household air pollution: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and burden estimation study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(11):e1427-e1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-....
27.
Argacha JF, Mizukami T, Bourdrel T, et al. Ecology of the cardiovascular system: Part II – A focus on non-air related pollutants. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2019;29(5):274282. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.09.003.
28.
Gilani TA, Mir MS. Association of road traffic noise exposure and prevalence of coronary artery disease: A cross-sectional study in North India. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(38):53458–53477. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11356-021-14582-2.
29.
Hassan D, Patel KK, Peddemul A, et al. Attitude and Health Practice towards Cardiovascular disease in Health care providers: A Systematic Review. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022:101206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpca....
30.
Clarke M, Chalmers I. Reflections on the history of systematic reviews. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(4):121–122. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110968.
31.
Hoffmann F, Allers K, Rombey T, et al. Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000–2019. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;138:1–11. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.022.
32.
Slim K, Marquillier T. Umbrella reviews: A new tool to synthesize scientific evidence in surgery. J Visc Surg. 2022;159(2):144–149. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.10.001.
33.
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
34.
Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, et al. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):132–40. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055.
35.
Klassen TP, Jadad AR, Moher D. Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: I. Getting started. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:700–704.
36.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (access: 2023.03.03).
37.
Lee YH. An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians. Korean J Intern Med. 2018; 33(2): 277–283. https://doi.org/ 10.3904/kjim.2016.195.
38.
Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, et al. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005;330 (7482):68. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/bmj.38336.804167.47.
39.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcli....
40.
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10.
41.
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4....
42.
Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, et al. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):15. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-2288-11-15.
43.
Pieper D, Antoine SL, Mathes T, et al. Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):368–375. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.007.
44.
Harrison SL, Buckley BJR, Rivera-Caravaca JM, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and COVID-19: an umbrella review of systematic reviews. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021;7(4):330–339. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab029.
45.
Chareonrungrueangchai K, Wongkawinwoot K, Anothaisintawee T, et al. Dietary Factors and Risks of Cardiovascular Diseases: An Umbrella Review. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1088. doi:10.3390/nu12041088.
46.
Nie X, Liu X, Wang C, et al. Assessment of evidence on reported non-genetic risk factors of congenital heart defects: the updated umbrella review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):371. doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04600-7.
47.
Hartmann-Boyce J, Livingstone-Banks J, Ordónez-Mena JM, et al. Behavioural interventions for smoking cessation: an overview and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;1:CD013229. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013229.pub2.
48.
Studziński K, Tomasik T, Krzysztoń J, et al. Effect of using cardiovascular risk scoring in routine risk assessment in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an overview of systematic reviews. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0990-2.
49.
Anderson L, Taylor RS. Cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart disease: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(12):CD011273. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011273.pub2.
50.
Byrne P, Cullinan J, Smith A, Smith SM. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e023085. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023085.
51.
Zhang TN, Wu QJ, Liu YS, et al. Environmental Risk Factors and Congenital Heart Disease: An Umbrella Review of 165 Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses With More Than 120 Million Participants. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 11;8:640729. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.640729.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
