RESEARCH PAPER
Figure from article: Cycling commuting as...
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Cycling commuting (CC) is increasingly recognized not only for its environmental and health benefits, but also for its psychological value. Preliminary research findings suggest that CC is often experienced as a form of relaxation. This led the exploration of CC as a potential form of emotional self-regulation (ESR), using Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and the concept of psychological commute characteristics (PCC) as explanatory frameworks.

Material and methods:
A qualitative study was conducted in Lublin, Poland, using abductive thematic analysis of 32 semi-structured interviews collected in 2020–2024. PCC dimensions and ESR strategies were operationalized and linked to inductively coded features of commuting practice. The analytical chain followed the logic: PCC → SDT need satisfaction → ESR.

Results:
All five ESR strategy families were present in cyclists’ narratives, with situation selection and situation modification most frequent. PCC features, such as decision latitude, psychological stimulation and physical aspects, supported autonomy and competence, while relatedness played a minor role. ESR strategies helped participants manage stressors and enhance positive emotions, explaining why CC is perceived as enjoyable and motivating.

Conclusions:
Cycling commuting can be reframed as a psychological practice that supports emotional regulation through everyday strategies. By integrating PCC, SDT, and ESR, the study offers a novel interpretive framework for understanding the psychological benefits of CC and provides insights for urban mobility policy and infrastructure design.nfrastructure design.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The study was funded in part by the National Science Centre: ‘Cyclist commuting in a large city as a social practice. Preliminary research.’(Grant No. 2023/07/X/HS6/01101).For the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC-BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Johansson C, Lövenheim B, Schantz P, et al. Impacts on air pollution and health by changing commuting from car to bicycle. Sci Total Environ. 2017;584–585:55–63. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.145.
 
2.
Philips I, Anable J, Chatterton T. E-bikes and their capability to reduce car CO2 emissions. Transp Policy. 2022;116:11–23. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.11.019.
 
3.
Shaw C, Blakely T, Atkinson J, Woodward A. Is mode of transport to work associated with mortality in the working-age population? Repeated census-cohort studies in New Zealand, 1996, 2001 and 2006. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49(2):477–485. doi:10.1093/ije/dyz257.
 
4.
Friel C, Walsh D, Whyte B, et al. Health benefits of pedestrian and cyclist commuting: evidence from the Scottish Longitudinal Study. BMJ Public Health. 2024; 2(1):e001295 doi:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001295.
 
5.
Avila-Palencia I, de Nazelle A, Cole-Hunter T, et al. The relationship between bicycle commuting and perceived stress: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(6):e013542. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013542.
 
6.
Chatterjee K, Chng S, Clark B, et al. Commuting and wellbeing: a critical overview of the literature with implications for policy and future research. Transp Rev. 2020;40(1):5–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/014416....
 
7.
Berrie L, Feng Z, Rice D, et al. Does cycle commuting reduce the risk of mental ill-health? An instrumental variable analysis using distance to nearest cycle path. Int J Epidemiol. 2024;53(1):dyad153. doi:10.1093/ije/dyad153.
 
8.
Liu J, Ettema D, Helbich M. Systematic review of the association between commuting, subjective wellbeing and mental health, Travel Behav Soc. 2022;28:59–74. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2022.02.006.
 
9.
Gatersleben B, Uzzell D. Affective appraisals of the daily commute – Comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclists, walkers, and users of public transport. Environ Behav. 2007;39(3):416–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391....
 
10.
Wild K, Woodward A. Why are cyclists the happiest commuters? Health, pleasure and the e-bike. J Transp Health. 2019;14:100569. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.008.
 
11.
Martin A, Goryakin Y, Suhrcke M. Does active commuting improve psychological wellbeing? Longitudinal evidence from eighteen waves of the British Household Panel Survey. Prev Med. 2014;69:296–303. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.023.
 
12.
Gerpott FH, Rivkin W, Unger D. Autonomous or controlled self-regulation, that is the question: A self-determination perspective on the impact of commuting on employees’ domain-specific functioning. Organ Psychol Rev. 2023;13(1):67–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/204138....
 
13.
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327....
 
14.
Reckwitz A. Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. Eur J Soc Theory. 2002;5(2):243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.
 
15.
Gross JJ. Conceptual foundations of emotion regulation. In: Gross JJ, Ford BQ, editors. Handbook of emotion regulation (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press; 2024. p. 3–12.
 
16.
Webb TL, Miles E, Sheeran P. Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychol Bull. 2012;138(4):775–808. doi:10.1037/a0027600.
 
17.
Te Brömmelstroet M, Nikolaeva A, Mladenović M, et al. Have a good trip! expanding our concepts of the quality of everyday travelling with flow theory. Appl Mobilities. 2021;7(4):352–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/238001....
 
18.
Spotswood F, Chatterton T, Tapp A, Williams D. Analysing Cycling as a Social Practice: An Empirical Grounding for Behaviour Change. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2015;29:22–33. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.-12.001.
 
19.
Guell C, Panter J, Jones NR, Ogilvie D. Towards a Differentiated Understanding of Active Travel Behaviour: Using Social Theory to Explore Everyday Commuting. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(1):233–239. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.038.
 
20.
Schneider PR. From elements to policies: A Shovian social practice perspective on pathways to facilitate daily E-bike commuting. Transp. Policy. 2023;143: 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.08.015.
 
21.
Weman K, Sepideh Soheili Shemirani S, Back J, et al. The value of using motivational theory to understand active transport behaviors: a qualitative study of a community-based E-bike project. Psychol Health. 2025;1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/088704....
 
22.
Mildestvedt T, Hovland O, Berntsen S, et al. Getting physically active by e-bike: An active commuting intervention study. Phys Act Health. 2020;4(1):120–129. https://doi.org/10.5334/paah.6....
 
23.
Burgueño R, Rutberg S, Nyberg L, et al. Adapting the behavioral regulation in active commuting to and from school questionnaire in Sweden: BR-ACS(SWE). Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2022;16:100721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip....
 
24.
Schönbach DMI, Marques A, Peralta M, et al. Validation of the need satisfaction in cycling to and from school scale among students from Germany. JCMR. 2024;3,100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmr....
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top