LETTER TO EDITORS
A voice in the discussion concerning causes for late diagnostics of cancer  of the reproductive organ in women, based on the example of the Lublin Region
			
	
 
More details
Hide details
	
	
									
				1
				Chair of Oncology and Environmental Health, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
				 
			 
						
				2
				Department of Health Informatics and Statistics, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
				 
			 
										
				
				
		
		 
			
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
							
																			
		
	 
		
 
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(2):221-223
		
 
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Cancerous diseases are the second cause of deaths in Poland, 
which results primarily from the fact of their late detection 
and  low  effectiveness  of  treatment,  despite  a  constant 
improvement in the situation [1]. The number of cases of 
cancer in Poland is still alarming. At present, approximately 
120,000 cases are noted annually, and for many years this 
number has been growing more rapidly than the number 
of  the  population.  Cancerous  diseases  are  the  cause  of 
approximately 40% of deaths among females and 30% of 
deaths among males aged 45–64, i.e. at reproductive age [2].
Since 2007, the number of the reported cases of malignant 
cancer in females has been systematically increasing. In 2010, 
70,024 new cases were reported among the population of 
males, and 70,540 in females. In 2010, standard morbidity 
rates were 254/10 5 in males, and 205/105 in females.   Per 100,000 
cases of diseases, 365 are due to malignant cancer [3, 4].
For many years, epidemiologists have been interested in 
the geographic distribution of the values of standardized 
morbidity and mortality rates due to cancer in Poland. 
The presently observed distribution fluctuates around the 
standard which has been in effect for over three decades. 
The Gdańsk and Poznań Regions are at the top of the list of 
regions according to the values of standardized morbidity 
rates due to malignant cancer (ICD-10 C00-D-09). The Lublin 
Region is placed in the middle of this list, preceding, among 
others, the Regions of Białystok, Warsaw, and Opole [4]. 
Analysis of the health situation of the inhabitants of the 
Lublin Region in recent years confirms the all-Polish problem 
in the control of cancerous diseases.
		
	
		
REFERENCES (22)
			
	1.
	
		Narodowy Program Zdrowia na lata 2007–2015 – Ministerstwo Zdrowia www.mz.gov.pl/wwwfiles/ma…/docs/zal_urm_npz_90_15052007p.pdf (access: 2013.11.30) (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
			
	3.
	
		Kościelska B. Zachorowania i zgony z powodu nowotworów złośliwych w Regionie Lubelskim w 2010 roku. Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. św. Jana z Dukli Wojewódzki Rejestr Nowotworów; Lublin, 2013 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	4.
	
		Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zatoński W. Nowotwory złośliwe w Polsce w 2010 roku. Centrum Onkologii Instytut im. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie; Warszawa, 2012 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	5.
	
		Ocena stanu zdrowia mieszkańców województwa lubelskiego. Urząd Marszałkowski Województwa Lubelskiego w Lublinie, Departament Zdrowia i Polityki Społecznej; Lublin, 2010 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	6.
	
		www.profilaktykarakaszyjkimacicy.pl (access: 2012.02.09) (in Polish).7. Olesen SC, Butterworth P, Jacomb P, Tait RJ. Personal factor influence use of cervical cancerices: epidemiological survey and linked administrative data address the limitations of previous research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012; 12: 34.
		
	 
	 
 			
	7.
	
		Kierunki rozwoju onkologii w Polsce: Programowa Narada Polskiego Towarzystwa Onkologicznego w dniu 04.04.2013 (access: 2012.02.09) (in Polish). www.pto.med.pl/aktualnosci/kierunki_rozwoju_onkologii_w_polsce_narada_pto_w_dniu_04_04_2013 (access: 2012.02.09) (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	8.
	
		Bojar I, Cvejić R, Głowacka DM, Koprowicz A, Humeniuk E, Owoc A. Morbidity and mortality due to cervical cancer in Poland after introduction of the Act –National programme for control of cancerous diseases. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19: 4.
		
	 
	 
 			
	9.
	
		Spaczyński M, Nowak-Markwitz E, Januszek-Michalecki L, Karowicz-Bilińska A. Profil socjalny kobiet a ich udział w Programie Profilaktyki i Wczesnego Wykrywania Raka Szyjki Macicy w Polsce. Ginekol Pol. 2009; 80: 833–838 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	10.
	
		Wożniak I. Wiedza o schorzeniach nowotworowych narządów kobiecych i postawy kobiet wobec badań profilaktycznych. Probl Pielęg. 2008;16(1,2): 136–143 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	11.
	
		Bojar I, Biliński P, Boyle P, Zatoński W, Marcinkowski J, Wojtyła A. Prevention of female reproductive system cancer among rural and Urban Polish pregnant women. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011;18: 1.
		
	 
	 
 			
	12.
	
		Pięta B, Wierzchowska- Chmaj K, Opala T. Life style and risk of development of brest and ovaria cancer. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(3): 379–384.
		
	 
	 
 			
	13.
	
		Bojar I, Wożnica I, Holecki T, Diatczyk J. Dostępność badań cytologicznych oraz poziom wiedzy kobiet na temat ich znaczenia w profilaktyce chorób nowotworowych narządu rodnego. Med Og. 2010;16(1): 77–88 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	14.
	
		Black AT, McCulloch A, Martin RE, Kan L. Young women and cervical cancer screening: what barriers persist? Can J Nurs Res. 2011;43(1): 8–21.
		
	 
	 
 			
	15.
	
		Marcinkowska M, Mazurkiewicz P, Kozaka J, Stencel A. Przyczyny niskiej frekwencji kobiet w profilaktycznych badaniach mammograficznych. Psychoonkologia 2010; 2: 57–63 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	16.
	
		Thompson B, Vilchis H, Moran C, Copeland W, Holte S, Duggan C. Increasing cervical cancer screening in the United States-Mexico border region. J Rural Health. 2014;30 (2): 196–205.
		
	 
	 
 			
	17.
	
		Biała Księga. Zwalczanie raka jelita grubego i raka piersi w Polsce na tle wybranych krajów europejskich. Analiza zasobów systemu opieki onkologicznej i czynników warunkujących sukces. Ośrodek Analiz Uniwersyteckich Sp. z o.o., Warszawa-Kraków, 2011 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	18.
	
		Pacewicz M, Krajewska-Kułak E, Krajewska-Ferishah K. Profilaktyka raka szyjki macicy – poziom wiedzy kobiet i mężczyzn. Med Paliat. 2012; 4: 217–228 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	19.
	
		Chmielarczyk W, Galicka M, Wojtaszczyk K. Refleksje na temat perspektywy edukacji onkologicznej w Polsce. Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology 2011; 61(2): 178–180 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	20.
	
		Wdowiak A, Bąk M, Lewicka M, Kanadys K, Bakalczuk G. Opinie kobiet odnośnie przyczyn korzystania z porad lekarza ginekologa. Med Og Nauk o Zdr. 2011; 17(2): 71–74 (in Polish).
		
	 
	 
 			
	21.
	
		Spleen AM, Lengerich EJ, Fabian T, Camacho RC. Health care avoidance among rural populations; results from a nationally representative survey. J Rural Health. 2014; 30(1): 79–88.
		
	 
	 
 			
	22.
	
		Cebulska V, Kożlak V, Rzempowska J, Rajbiś-Jerzyk M. Poziom wiedzy i umiejętności kobiet w wieku średnim w zakresie dokonywania samooceny zdrowia. Hygeia Public Health 2011; 46(3): 372–375 (in Polish).