RESEARCH PAPER
Brucella and Ochrobactrum – differences and similarities
More details
Hide details
1
Biological Threats Identification and Countermeasure Centre, Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Warsaw, Poland
2
Chair and Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
Corresponding author
Dorota Żakowska
Biological Threats Identification and Countermeasure Center, Military Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Lubelska 4, 24-100, Pulawy, Poland
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Brucella and Ochrobactrum are genetically-related strains of bacteria belonging to the same Alphaproteobacteria class, due to their evolutionary origin. However, the two strains are distinct species. Brucella is the genus of bacteria that causes the infectious disease called brucellosis. Ochrobactrum is a genus of bacteria that can usually act as opportunistic pathogens with low virulence, such as Ochrobactrum anthropi. The aim of the review is analysis of available knowledge indicating similarities as well as differences between both bacteria.
Review methods:
Analysis of recent literature indicates that combining Ochrobactrum and Brucella genus causes issues, resulting in difficulties in brucellosis research and diagnosis. Distinguishing between these two types of bacteria can be time-consuming and costly, which consequently leads to delayed development of research methods, medicines, as well as vaccines against brucellosis. The following analysis draws on a publication with national and global reach.
Brief description of the state of knowledge:
Currently, there is a dispute among taxonomists regarding the combination of the genus Brucella with Ochrobactrum. The idea of the combination of these two genus was based on the results of genetic analysis. However, the following assumptions do not take into account significant differences in pathogenicity, morphology, or phenotypic characteristics, which should not be ignored.
Summary:
Combining the Brucella and Ochrobactrum genus may lead to misidentification, which can result in inadequate treatment or delayed diagnosis of brucellosis. In the case of brucellosis, delays in diagnosis and treatment can lead to severe complications, or even death.
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Vila A, Pagella H, Bello GV, et al. Brucella suis bacteremia misidentified as Ochrobactrum anthropi by the VITEK 2 system. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016;10(4):432–6. doi:10.3855/jidc.7532.
3.
Qureshia KA, Parvezc A, Fahmyd NA, et al. Brucellosis: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment – a comprehensive review. Ann Med. 2023;55(2).
https://doi.org/10.1080/078538....
4.
Ghssein G, Ezzeddine Z, Sima Tokajian S, et al. Brucellosis: bacteriology, pathogenesis, epidemiology and role of the metallophores in virulence: a review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025;8:15:1621230. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1621230.
5.
Annual epidemiological report for 2022. Stockholm: ECDC; 2024.
6.
She R, Anglewicz C, Jerke K, et al. Brucella and Ochrobactrum Taxonomic Updates for Laboratories. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for Clinical Laboratories. Am Soc Microbiol.
https://asm.org›getmedia›bruce....
7.
Holmes B, Poppoff M, Kiredjian M, et al. Ochrobactrum anthropi gen. nov., sp. nov. from Human Clinical Specimens and Previously Known as Group Vd. Inter J Systematic Bacteriol. 1988;38(4):406–416.
https://doi.org/10.1099/002077....
8.
Ryan MP, Pembroke JT. The Genus Ochrobactrum as Major Opportunistic Pathogens. Microorganisms. 2020;8(11):1797. doi:10.3390/microorganisms8111797.
9.
Babu A, Bhatawadekar SM, Kumar M, et al. Ochrobactrum anthropi: An Unusual Emerging Pathogen. Journal of Health and Research, Chrismed J Health Res. 2023;10(1):115 7. doi:10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_95_22.
10.
Anjana A, Adhikary R, Bhavana MV, et al. Two Case Reports of Ochrobactrum anthropi Bacteremia: An Overlooked Pathogen. J Lab Physicians. 2023;15:166–168.
12.
Poddębniak M, Jafra S. Ability for biodegradation and bioadsorption of the bacteria from Ochrobactrum genus important in bioremediation. Biotechnologia. 2009;87(4):152–167.
13.
Gałgowska J, Ruszkowski J, Chmielewski M, et al. Ochrobactrum anthropi as an unusual cause of dialysis-associated peritonitis. Forum Nefrologiczne. 2020;13(3):138–141.
14.
Kassab I, Sarsam N, Affas S, et al. A Case of Ochrobactrum intermedium Bacteremia Secondary to Cholangitis With a Literature Review. Cureus. 2021;13(4):e14648. doi:10.7759/cureus.14648.
15.
Głowacka P, Żakowska D, Naylor K, et al. Brucella – Virulence Factors, Pathogenesis and Treatment. Pol J Microbiol. 2018;67(2):151–161. doi:10.21307/pjm-2018-029.
16.
Occhialini A, Hofreuter D, Ufermann ChM, et al. The Retrospective on Atypical Brucella Species Leads to Novel Definitions. Microorganisms. 2022;10:813.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microo....
17.
Yumuk Z, O’Callaghan D. Brucellosis in Turkey – an overview. Int J Infect. 2012; 16(4):e228–35, doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2011.12.011.
18.
Moreno E, Blasco JM, Letesson JJ, et al. Pathogenicity and Its Implications in Taxonomy: The Brucella and Ochrobactrum Case. Pathogens. 2022;11(3):377. doi:10.3390/pathogens11030377.
19.
Zeb S, Yasmin H, Malik IR, et al. Antimicrobial resistant Brucella spp. prevail in raw milk and animal feces of different livestock farms. BMC Microbiology. 2025;25:231.
20.
Rastogi N, Mathur P. Ochrobactrum anthropi: An emerging pathogen causing meningitis with sepsis in a neurotrauma patient. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017;11(9):733–735. doi:10.3855/jidc.9146.
21.
Thoma B, Straube E, Scholz HC, et al. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Ochrobactrum spp. Int J Med Microbiol. 2009;299(3):209–20.
https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ijm....
22.
Moreno E, Middlebrook EA, Altamirano-Silva P, et al. If You’re Not Confused, You’re Not Paying Attention: Ochrobactrum Is Not Brucella. J Clin Microbiol. 2023;61(8):e0043823. doi:10.1128/jcm.00438-23.
23.
Vetrovsky T, Baldrian P. The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57923.
24.
Massot F, Gkorezis P, McAmmond B, et al. First high-quality draft genome of Ochrobactrum haematophilum P6BS-III, a highly glyphosate-tolerant strain isolated from agricultural soil in Argentina. Biotech. 2019;9(3):74. doi.org/10.1007/s13205-019-1606-y.
25.
Yang J, Ren X, Chu M, et al. Mistaken Identity of Brucella Infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(6):2011. https;//doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03222-12.
27.
Leclercq SO, Cloeckaert A, Zygmunt MS. Taxonomic organization of the family Brucellaceae based on a phylogenomic approach. Front Microbiol. 2020;10:3083.https;//doi.org./10.3389/fmicb.2019.03083.
28.
Hördt A, López MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, et al. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:468.
http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2....
29.
Whatmore AM. Current understanding of the genetic diversity of Brucella, an expanding genus of zoonotic pathogens. Infect Genet Evol. 2009;9(6):1168–1184. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2009.07.001.
30.
Whatmore AM, Foster JT. Emerging diversity and ongoing expansion of the genus Brucella. Infect Genetics Evolut. 2021;92:104865. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104865.
31.
Banai M, Jiang H, Peng X, et al. The prevention and control of domesticated animal brucellosis. Biosafety Health. 2021;3(4):197–201.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bshe....