RESEARCH PAPER
Trichinellosis in Slovakia – epidemiological situation in humans and animals (2009–2018)
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Parasitology SAS, Košice, Slovak Republic
2
Veterinary and Food Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
3
Regional Authority of Public Health, Banská Bystrica, Slovak Republic
4
Faculty of Medicine, P. J. Šafárik University, Košice, Slovak Republic
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Daniela Antolová   

Institute of Parasitology SAS, Hlinkova 3, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
Ethical standards. The study was performed in accordance with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013, and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Institute of Parasitology of SAS (No. EK 04/2015). All respondents or their legal representatives agreed with the survey and signed the informed consent. No identifying data are presented in the paper.
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Trichinella spp. are zoonotic parasitic nematodes with almost worldwide distribution. The infection can be transmitted through the foodborne route and can cause serious health problems in infected human patients. It is also an economically important issue due to the high financial cost connected with prevention of the disease.

Objective:
The study aimed to discover trends in the epidemiological situation in people and animals in Slovakia in 2009–2018.

Material and methods:
Data on human trichinellosis originated from the Public Health Authority of the Slovak Republic, and data on Trichinella infection in animals from the State Veterinary and Food Administration of the Slovak Republic. A seroepidemiological study on 655 voluntary respondents was performed.

Results:
Altogether, 29 human cases were reported between 2009–2018, with a maximum of 13 cases in 2011. Males were affected more often (19 cases) than females (10 cases); the average age of patients was 45.1 years. Antibodies to Trichinellawere detected in two sera (0.3%): in a serum from one hunter and one veterinarian. In the monitored period, the average prevalence of Trichinella infection was 9.6% in 2,295 red foxes, and 0.04% in 165,643 wild boars. Three (1.7%) of 178 surveyed brown bears were positive. Within the compulsory monitoring of trichinellosis in domestic pigs, none from a total of 1,632,688 pigs were positive. The presence of three species, Trichinellabritovi, T. spiralis and T. pseudospiralis, was documented, with T. britovi representing 93.9% of identified isolates.

Conclusions:
The study indicates that the prevalence of Trichinella infection has not changed considerably with time in Slovakia, and the risk of human infection outbreaks is connected mainly with the consumption of wild boar meat.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The study was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under Contract No. APVV-15–0114, and by the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA, Project No. 1/0043/19.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.
 
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Pozio E, Zarlenga DS. New pieces of the Trichinella puzzle. Int J Parasitol. 2013; 43(12–13): 983–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpa....
 
2.
Gottstein B, Pozio E, Nöckler K. Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009; 22(1): 127–145. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00026-08.
 
3.
Devleesschauwer B, Praet N, Speybroeck N, Torgerson PR, Haagsma JA, De Smet K, et al. The low global burden of trichinellosis: evidence and implications. Int J Parasitol. 2014; 45(2–3): 95–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ij....
 
4.
Korhonen PK, Pozio E, La Rosa G, Chang BC, Koehler A, Hoberg EP, et al. Phylogenomic and biogeographic reconstruction of the Trichinellacomplex. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 10513. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10513.
 
5.
Pozio E. World distribution of Trichinella spp. infections in animals and humans. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 149(1–2): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetp....
 
6.
Hurníková Z, Dubinský P. Long-term survey on Trichinella prevalence in wildlife of Slovakia. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 159(3–4): 276–280.
 
7.
Dubinský P, Antolová D, Reiterová K. Human Trichinella outbreaks in Slovakia, 1980–2008. Acta Parasitol. 2016; 61(2): 205–211. doi: 10.1515/ap-2016–0029.
 
8.
Pozio E. Trichinella and trichinellosis in Europe. Vet Glas. 2019; 00: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2298/VETGL1.... Pozio E, Murrell KD. Systematics and epidemiology of Trichinella. Adv Parasitol. 2006; 63: 367–43.
 
10.
Ranque S, Faugère B, Pozio E, La Rosa G, Tamburrini A, Pellissier JF, et al. Trichinella pseudospiralis outbreak in France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000; 6(5): 543–547. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201%2Fe....
 
11.
Gomez Morales MA, Amati M, Ludovisi A, Mazzarello G, Viscoli C, Pozio E. Inference of the Trichinella species causing a human outbreak by serology. Abstract book of 14th International Conference on Trichinellosis 68; 2015 Sept 14–18, Berlin, GerMaley. https://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/349... (access: 2020.01.18).
 
12.
Reiterová K, Dubinský P, Klimenko VV, Tomašovičová O, Dvorožňáková E. Comparison of Trichinella spiralis larva antigens for the detection of specific antibodies in pigs. Vet Med Czech. 1999; 44(1): 1–5.
 
13.
Reiterová K, Kinčeková J, Šnábel V, Marucci G, Pozio E, Dubinský P.Trichinella spiralis-outbreak in the Slovak Republic. Infection 2007;35(2): 89–93.
 
14.
Zákon 39/2007 Z.z. Zákon z 12. decembra 2006 o veterinárnej starostlivosti. Zbierka zákonov 39/2007, 2006; čiastka 28: 162–223. (in Slovak).
 
15.
EURL. Identification of Trichinella muscle stage larvae at the species level by Multiplex PCR. European Union Reference Laboratory for Parasites, Institutio Superiore di Sanita. 2018; 10 p. Online https://iss-eurlp.azurewebsite... MI-02-WEB-SITE.pdf (access: 2020.01.18).
 
16.
Reiczigel J, Marozzi M, Fabian I, Rozsa L. Biostatistics for parasitologists – a primer to quantitative parasitology. Trends Parasitol. 2019; 35: 277–281.
 
17.
Líbová E, Mittermayer T, Bayer B, Chroust K, Suchárová T, Chudová M. Epidemy of human trichinellosis in Bardejov region in 1980. Helminthologia 1984; 21: 81–91.
 
18.
Moskwa B, Cybulska A, Kornacka A, Cabaj W, Bień J. Wild boars meat as a potential source of human trichinellosis in Poland: current data. Acta Parasitol. 2015; 60(3): 530–535. doi: 10.1515/ap-2015-0075.
 
19.
Murrell KD, Pozio E. Worldwide occurrence and impact of human trichinellosis, 1986–2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011; 17(12): 2194–2202. http://d x.doi.org/10.3201/eid 1712.110896.
 
20.
SZÚ (2020) Výskyt vybraných hlášených infekcí v České republice, leden – prosinec 2019. Online http://www.szu.cz/publikace/da... (access: 2020.01.16).
 
21.
Glatz K, Danka J, Kucsera I, Pozio E. Human trichinellosis in Hungary from 1965 to 2009. Parasite 2010; 17(3): 193–198.
 
22.
Glatz K, Danka J, Tombácz Z, Bányai T, Szilágyi A, Kucsera I. An outbreak of trichinellosis in Hungary. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2012; 59(2): 225–238. doi: 10.1556/AMicr.59.2012.2.7.
 
23.
Sadkowska-Todys M, BauMalen-Popczyk A, Wnukowska N, Popczyk B, Kucharczyk B, Golab E. Occurrence and prevalence of selected zoonotic agents: Echinococcus multilocularis, Trichinella spiralis and Hepatitis E virus (HEV) in the population of polish hunters – results of the study conducted in 2010–2012. Przegl Epidemiol.2015; 69(4): 673–678.
 
24.
Moller LN, Koch A, Petersen E, Hjuler T, Kapel CMO, Andersen A, et al. Trichinella infection in a hunting community in East Greenland. Epidemiol Infect. 2010; 138(9): 1252–1256.
 
25.
Dimzas D, Diakou A, Koutras C, Gómez Morales MA, Psalla D, Keryttopoulos P, et al. Human trichinellosis caused by Trichinella britovi in Greece, and literature review. J Helminthol. 2020; 94, e33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00221....
 
26.
Statistical Yearbook of the Slovak Republic. Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic. 2020. Online https://slovak.statistics.sk (access: 2020.06.10).
 
27.
Hunter Statistical Yearbook of the Slovak Republic. National Forest centre. 2020. Online www.forestportal.sk (access: 2020.06.10).
 
28.
Hurníková Z, Šnábel V, Pozio E, Reiterová K, Hrčková G, Halásová D, et al. First record of Trichinella pseudospiralis in the Slovak Republic found in domestic focus. Vet Parasitol. 2005; 128(1–2): 91–98.
 
29.
Hurníková Z, Komorová P, Chovancová G. Trichinella pseudospiralisin wildlife of Slovakia. In Abstracts of XVI. Conference of Ukrainian Scientific Society of Parasitologists, Lviv, 2017 Sept 18–21; Kyiv, Ukraine. Ukrainian Scientific Society of Parasitologists, p. 92.
 
30.
Széll Z, Marucci G, Zoltán T, Pozio E, Sréter T. A Trichinella-fajok elterjedtsége hazánkban [Spatial distribution of Trichinella spp. in Hungary]. Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja 2015; 137(8): 495–506. (in Hungarian).
 
31.
SVA. V České republice byl po půl roce zjištěn výskyt nebezpečného parazita u divočáka. [The occurrence of dangerous parasite was recorded after a half of year in the Czech Republic]. State Veterinary Administration. 2019. Online https://en.svscr.cz/ (access: 2020.01.20).
 
32.
Flis M, Grela ER, Gugala D. Epizootic and epidemiological situation of Trichinella sp. infection in Poland in 2006–2015 in view of wild boar population dynamics. J Vet Res. 2017; 61(2): 181–187. doi: 10.1515/jvetres-2017-0023.
 
33.
Bilska-Zajac E, Rózycki M, Chmurzynska E, Marucci G, Cencek T, Karamon J, et al. Trichinella species circulating in wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations in Poland. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2013; 2: 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpp.... 004.
 
34.
Bilska-Zajac E, Rózycki M, Chmurzynska E, Karamon J, Sroka J, Antolak E, et al. First record of wild boar infected with Trichinella pseudospiralis in Poland. J Vet Res. 2016; 60: 147–152. doi: 10.1515/jvetres-2016-0021.
 
35.
Moskwa B, Goździk K, Bień J, Borecka A, Gawor J, Cabaj W. First report of Trichinella pseudospiralis in Poland, in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Acta Parasitol. 2013; 58(2), 149–154. doi: 10.2478/s11686-013-0121-2.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966