RESEARCH PAPER
The role of age, environmental and occupational factors on semen density
 
More details
Hide details
1
Chair and Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Endocrinology, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Obstetrics-Gynaecological Nursing, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
3
PhD student, Chair and Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Endocrinology, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
4
I Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Grzegorz Jakiel   

I Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011;18(2):437–440
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The problem of effect of the environment on human reproduction has been in the focus of researchers’ interest for many years.

Objective:
To examine the relationship between semen density in males with reproduction problems, and their age, living and working conditions.

Material and Methods:
The study covered 224 males with reproduction problems. The study had a prospective character and was conducted in three stages – the first stage was carried out using the questionnaire devised by the authors; the second and the third stages consisted in the examination and evaluation of male semen density. Statistical analysis was used to search for the relationship between these groups and variables adopted in the study, i.e. age, occupation performed, place of residence, self-reported housing conditions and material standard, reporting by the males in the study of arduousness of work or health hazards perceived by the males examined, and duration of employment in such conditions.

Results:
The males in the study were divided into three groups according to their semen density. Group I (20 × 106 mln/ml or more) included 62 (27.7%) respondents, Group II (below 20 × 106 mln/ml) covered 121 males (54.0%), while Group III (only single spermatozoa or none) – 41 males (18.3%). Male semen density are significantly correlated with men’s ages and jobs as well as the general evaluations of the jobs held by the men (p<0.05). No significant relationship is observed between living conditions, arduous work conditions and occupational hazards as perceived by males, or duration of employment in such conditions, and male semen density (p>0.05).

Conclusions:
The results obtained encourage continuation of the studies and cover a larger group of males with reproduction problems.

 
REFERENCES (29)
1.
ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2000. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2004;19(3):490–503.
 
2.
Dudgeon MR, Inhorn MC. Men’s influences on women’s reproductive health: medical anthropological perspectives. Soc Sci Med 2004;59(7):1379-1395.
 
3.
Radwan J. (red.). Niepłodność i rozród wspomagany. (Infertility and the assisted reproduction techniques). Wyd. Med. Termedia, Wyd. II, Poznań 2005:33-40.
 
4.
Joffe M. Infertility and environmental pollutants. Br Med Bull 2003;68(1):47-70.
 
5.
Kumar S. Occupational exposure associated with reproductive dysfunction. J Occup Health 2004;46(1):1-19.
 
6.
Schmid TE, Eskenazi B, Baumgartner A, Marchetti F, Young S, Weldon R, Anderson D, Wyrobek AJ. The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage in healthy non-smokers. Hum Reprod 2007;22(1):180-187.
 
7.
Sheiner EK, Sheiner E, Hammel R, Potashnik G, Carel R. Effect of occupational exposures on male fertility: literature review. Ind Health 2003;41(2):55-62.
 
8.
Stefankiewicz J, Kurzawa R, Droździk M. Czynniki środowiskowe upośledzające płodność mężczyzn. (Environmental factors disturbing fertility of men). Gin Pol 2006;77(2):163-169.
 
9.
Wdowiak A, Wdowiak L, Wiktor H: Evaluation of the effect of using mobile phones on male fertility. Ann Agric Environ Med 2007;14:169-172.
 
10.
WHO: Manual for the Standardized Investigation and Diagnosis of the Infertile Couple. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000.
 
11.
Stanisz A. Przystępny kurs statystyki w oparciu o program STATISTICA PL na przykładach z medycyny. (The course of the STATISTICA PL program in the examples of medical statistic).Wyd. StatSoft , Polska, t. I, Kraków, 2001.
 
12.
Claman P. Men at risk: occupation and male infertility. Fertil Steril 2004;81(Suppl 2):19-26.
 
13.
Cherry N, Moore H, McNamee R, Pacey A, Burgess G, Clyma JA, Dippnall M, Baillie H, Povey A; participating centres of Chaps-UK. Occupation and male infertility: glycol ethers and other exposures. Occup Environ Med 2008;65(10):708-14.
 
14.
Sheiner EK, Sheiner E, Carel R, Potashnik G, Shoham- Vardi I. Potential association between male infertility and occupational psychological stress. J Occup Environ Med 2002;44(12):1093–1099.
 
15.
Tas S, Lauwerys R, Lisom D. Occupational Hazards of the Male Reproductive System. Crit Rev Toxicol 1996;26(3):261 – 307.
 
16.
De Fleurian G, Perrin J, Ecochard R, Dantony E, Lanteaume A, Achard V, Grillo JM, Guichaoua MR, Botta A, Sari-Minodier I. Occupational exposures obtained by questionnaire in clinical practice and their association with semen quality. J Androl 2009;30(5):566-79.
 
17.
Jung A, Schuppe HC. Influence of genital heat stress on semen quality in humans. Andrologia 2007;39(6):203-15.
 
18.
Kovacic P, Jacintho JD. Reproductive toxins: pervasive theme of oxidative stress and electron transfer. Curr Med Chem 2001;8(7):863-892.
 
19.
Multigner L, Ben Brik E, Arnaud I, Haguenoer JM, Jouannet P, Auger J, Eustache F. Glycol ethers and semen quality: a cross-sectional study among male workers in the Paris Municipality. Occup Environ Med 2007;64(7):467-73.
 
20.
Naha N, Manna B. Mechanism of lead induced effects on human spermatozoa after occupational exposure. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2007;5(1):85-94.
 
21.
Oliva A, Spira A, Multigner L. Contribution of environmental factors to the risk of male infertility. Hum Reprod 2001;16(8):1768–1776.
 
22.
Saradha B, Mathur PP. Effect of environmental contaminants on male reproduction. Environ. Toxicol Pharmacol 2006;21(1):34-41.
 
23.
Romanowska-Słomka I, Cież K. Ryzyko zawodowe rolnika dla wybranych zagrożeń. (Occupational risk in the work of a farmer of select hazards). Inż Rol 2006;79(4):139-145.
 
24.
Golec J, Hanke W, Dąbrowski S. Ryzyko zaburzeń płodności u osób zawodowo eksponowanych na pestycydy. (Risk of reproductive disorders in greenhouse workers). Med Pr 2004;54(5):465-472.
 
25.
Schneid-Kofman N, Sheiner E. Does stress effect male infertility? - a debate. Med Sci Monit 2005;11(8):11-13.
 
26.
Bielawska-Batorowicz E. Psychologiczne aspekty prokreacji.(Psychological aspects of the procreation) Wyd. Nauk. Śląsk, Katowice 2006.
 
27.
Pook M, Tuschen-Caffier B, Krause W. Is infertility a risk factor for impaired male fertility? Hum Reprod 2004;19(4):954-9.
 
28.
Fenster L, Katz DF, Wyrobek AJ, Pieper C, Rempel DM, Oman D, Swan SH. Effects of psychological stress on human semen quality. J Androl 1997;18(2):194–202.
 
29.
Gibin PT, Poland ML, Moghissi KS, Ager JW, Olson JM. Effects of stress and characteristics adaptability on semen quality in healthy men. Fertil Steril 1988;49:127–132.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966