0.829
IF
20
MNiSW
166.26
ICV
 
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
 
 

Impact of spinal pain on daily living activities in postmenopausal women working in agriculture

Dorota Raczkiewicz 1  ,  
Alfred Owoc 2,  
Tomasz Saran 4,  
 
1
Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
2
Center for Public Health and Health Promotion, Institute of Rural Health in Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
4
Department of General and NeuroRehabilitation, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
5
Department for Woman Health, Institute of Rural Health in Lublin, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med 2017;24(1):134–140
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
Introduction and objective. Postmenopausal women working in agriculture suffer from spinal pain for two overlapping reasons, the first is related to the menopause and the second to the specificity of rural work, which includes lifting heavy objects and changing weather conditions. Spinal pain affects the daily life of women as well as their ability to work. The objective of the study was to analyse the impact of spinal pain on activities of daily life in Polish postmenopausal women performing agricultural work. Materials and method. The study was conducted in 2016 in Poland and included 1,119 post-menopausal women living in rural areas and working in agriculture. The women assessed the severity of spinal pain in 3 sections: neck, thorax and lumbar. Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Low Back Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires were used to assess the impact of spinal pain on daily life activities. Generalized linear models were estimated in statistical analyses. Results. Postmenopausal women working in agriculture suffered most often from pain in the lumbar spine, less frequently in the neck, and the least in the thoracic. The most common was an isolated pain in only one section of the spine. Spinal pain disturbed the most the women’s rest, standing, lifting objects, while sleep, concentration, and walking the least. The impact of spinal pain on the activities of daily life, on average, was moderate, and increased with greater pain severity, the earlier the age the pain started, the higher the body weight, the lower education level and if there was a co-existing pain in any of the other spine sections. The impact of spinal pain on daily life activities did not depend on age between 45–65, WHR, age at last menstruation, parity, and number and types of births. Conclusions.The impact of spinal pain on daily life activities in postmenopausal women working in agriculture was assessed as moderate, on average, and depended mainly on spinal pain-related characteristics, such as severity, age at onset and co-existence of pain in any other spinal sections
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Dorota Raczkiewicz   
Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland
 
REFERENCES:
1. Côté P, van der Velde G, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, Holm LW, Carragee EJ, Haldeman S, Nordin M, Hurwitz EL, Guzman J, Peloso PM; Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15; 33(4 Suppl): S60–74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643ee4.
2. Rainville J, Smeets RJ, Bendix T, Tveito TH, Poiraudeau S, Indahl AJ. Fear-avoidance beliefs and pain avoidance in low back pain--translating research into clinical practice. Spine J. 2011 Sep; 11(9): 895–903. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.006.
3. Fabris de Souza SA, Faintuch J, Valezi AC, Sant’Anna AF, Gama-Rodrigues JJ, de Batista Fonseca IC, de Melo RD. Postural changes in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2005 Aug; 15(7): 1013–6.
4. Liuke M, Solovieva S, Lamminen A, Luoma K, Leino-Arjas P, Luukkonen R, Riihimäki H. Disc degeneration of the lumbar spine in relation to overweight. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005 Aug; 29(8): 903–8.
5. Park H, Sprince NL, Whitten PS, Burmeister LF, Zwerling C. Risk factors for back pain among male farmers: analysis of Iowa Farm Family Health and Hazard Surveillance Study. Am J Ind Med. 2001 Dec; 40(6): 646–54.
6. Fathallah FAM, James M, Janowitz Ira. Stooped and Squatting Postures in the Workplace. Oakland, California: 2004. Stooped and Squatting Postures in the Workplace.
7. Kirkhorn SR, Earle-Richardson G, Banks RJ. Ergonomic risks and musculoskeletal disorders in production agriculture: recommendations for effective research to practice. J Agromedicine. 2010 Jul; 15(3): 281–99. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2010.488618.
8. Xiao H, McCurdy SA, Stoecklin-Marois MT, Li CS, Schenker MB. Agricultural work and chronic musculoskeletal pain among Latino farm workers: the MICASA study. Am J Ind Med. 2013 Feb; 56(2): 216–25. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22118. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
9. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP: The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980; 66: 271–273.
10. Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 1991; 14: 409–15.
11. Urquhart DM, Bell R, Cicuttini FM, Cui J, Forbes A, Davis SR. Low back pain and disability in community-based women: prevalence and associated factors. Menopause 2009 Jan-Feb; 16(1): 24–9. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31817e5ce0.
12. de Leboeuf YC. Body weight and low back pain. A systematic literature review of 56 journal articles reporting on 65 epidemiologic studies. Spine 2000; 25: 226–237.
13. Kose G, Hatipoglu S. The effect of low back pain on the daily activities of patients with lumbar disc herniation: a Turkish military hospital experience. J Neurosci Nurs. 2012 Apr; 44(2): 98–104. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0b013e3182478e57.
14. Veresciagina K, Ambrozaitis KV, Spakauskas B. The measurements of health-related quality-of-life and pain assessment in the preoperative patients with low back pain. Medicina (Kaunas). 2009; 45(2): 111–22.
15. Baumgart M, Radzimińska A, Szpinda M, Kurzyński P, Goch A, Zukow W. Spinal pain among nurses. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2015; 5(9): 633–646.
16. Czenczek-Lewandowska E, Przysada G, Brotoń K, Leszczak J, Rykała J, Podgórska-Bednarz J. Wpływ rehabilitacji na stan funkcjonalny oraz dolegliwości bólowe pacjentów z zespołem przeciążeniowym kręgosłupa. Przegląd Medyczny Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego i Narodowego Instytutu Leków w Warszawie. 2014; 3: 243–252.
17. Burak R, Sapuła R, Burak M, Soboń M, Chrzan S. Wpływ rehabilitacji na jakość życia pacjentów z zespołem bólowym w odcinku lędźwiowo-krzyżowym. Zamojskie Studia i Materiały Seria Fizjoterapia. 2012; 2(14): 71–80.
18. Altuğ F, Kavlak E, Kurtca MP, Ünal A, Cavlak U. Comparison of pain intensity, emotional status and disability level in patients with chronic neck and low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015; 28(3): 505–8. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140548.
19. Whalen RT, Carter DR, Steele CR. Influence of physical activity on the regulation of bone density. J Biomech. 1988; 21(10): 825–37.
20. Walker B, Muller R, Grant W. Low back pain in Australian adults. Prevalence and associated disability. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004; 27: 238–244.
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966