0.829
IF
20
MNiSW
166.26
ICV
RESEARCH PAPER
 
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
 
 

Differences in the intensity of physical activity during school days and weekends in Polish and Czech boys and girls

Karel Frömel 1,  
Michal Kudlacek 1, 2  ,  
 
1
Faculty of Physical Culture, Institute of Active Lifestyle, Center for Kinanthropology Research, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Physical Culture, Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
3
Department of Physical Education, Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med 2016;23(2):357–360
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
Introduction and objective:
The physical, mental and social development that occurs in young people through physical activity (PA) is primarily through extracurricular activities. Family, peers and social environment, in addition to schools, interest groups and school sports, play a unique role during this developmental period. The objective of the study was to examine the differences in the intensity of PA during school days and weekends and the relationship between PA and physical inactivity (PI) during these days in Polish and Czech boys and girls.

Material and Methods:
In total, there were 816 participants among whom 333 met the requirements of 8 hours of continuous recording of PA (ActiTrainer accelerometers) during at least one school and one weekend day.

Results:
Boys and girls from both countries engaged in virtually the same amount of PA during school and weekend days, and participated in more PA at lower intensities on the weekends compared with school days.

Conclusions:
This study surveyed important issues related to global public health, specifically for the school environment and school settings. The important and crucial relations with family were emphasized, which should increase the awareness and understanding of public health problems of this particular research sample. The results indicated that less time was spent in PI, but also that the largest amount of time during the weekends was spent in front of a screen.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Michal Kudlacek   
Faculty of Physical Culture, Institute of Active Lifestyle, Center for Kinanthropology Research, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
 
REFERENCES:
1. Strong WB, Malina RM, Mlimkie CJR, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B, Hetgenroeder AC, Must A, Nixon PA, Pivarnik JM, Rowland T, Trost S, Trudeaue F. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005; 145: 732–737.
2. Taylor AH, Cable NT, Faulkner G, Hillsdon M, Narici M, Van Der Bij AK. Physical activity and older adults: a review of health benefits and the effectiveness of interventions. J Sports Sci. 2004; 22: 703–725.
3. Warburton DER, Nicol CW, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J. 2006; 174: 801–809.
4. Wolf AM, Colditz GA. Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States. Obesity Res. 2012; 6: 97–106.
5. Trudeau F, Shephard RJ. Physical education, school physical activity, school sports and academic performance. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 1–12.
6. Bergier J. The level of physical activity in society today – the problem of modern civilization (research overview). Hum Health. 2012; 6(1): 13–22.
7. Bartoszewicz R, Frömel K. Motor activity of junior high school students in the period of socio-economic transformations in the Poland and the Czech Republic. Human Movement. 2006; 7: 14–24.
8. Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T. Physical activity, fitness, and health. Human Kinetics, Champaign (IL) Human Kinetics, 1994.
9. Hallal PC, Victora CG, Azevedo MR, Wells JCK. Adolescent physical activity and health – A systematic review. Sports Med. 2006; 36: 1019–1030.
10. Brusseau TA, Kulinna PH, Tudor-Locke C, van der Mars H, Darst PW. Children’s step counts on weekend, physical education and non-physical education days. J Human Kinetics. 2011; 27: 116–134.
11. Fairclough SJ, Ridgers ND, Welk G. Correlates of children’s moderate and vigorous physical activity during weekdays and weekends. J Phys Act Health. 2012; 9: 129–137.
12. Treuth MS, Catellier DJ, Schmitz KH, Pate RR, Elder JP, McMurray RG, Blew RM, Yang S, Webber L. Weekend and weekday patterns of physical activity in overweight and normal-weight adolescent girls. Obesity. 2007; 15: 1782–1788.
13. Rowlands AV, Pilgrim EL, Eston RG. Patterns of habitus activity Gross weekdays and weekend days in 9–11-year-old children. Prev Med. 2008; 46: 317–324.
14. Davis JN, Hodges VA, Gillham MB. Physical activity compliance: differences between overweight/obese and normal-weight adults. Obesity. 2006; 14: 2259–2265.
15. Jago R, Andreson CB, Baranowski T, Watson K. Adolescent patterns of physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28: 447–452.
16. Generelo E, Zaragoza J, Julián JA, Abarca-Sos A, Murillo B. Physical activity patterns in normal-weight adolescents on week-days and week-ends. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011; 51: 647–653.
17. Santos MP, Gomes H, Mota J. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors in adolescents. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 30: 21–24.
18. Bergier B, Bergier J. Paprzycki P. Level and determinants of physical activity among school adolescents in Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014; 21(1):75–78.
  WWW
19. Nováková Lokvencová P, Frömel K, Chmelík F, Groffik D, Bebčáková V. School and weekend physical activity of 15–16 year old Czech, Slovak and Polish adolescents. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Gymnica. 2011; 41: 39–45.
20. Neuls, F. Validity and reliability of “step count” function of the actitrainer activity monitor under controlled conditions. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Gymnica. 2008; 38: 55–64.
21. Chytil J. Program ActiTrainer09. SoftWareCentrum: Olomouc, 2010.
22. Edwards S. Leitfaden zur Trainingskontrolle. Meyer and Meyer Verlag: Aachen, 1994.
23. Sheskin DJ. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, 2007.
24. Tolson H. An adjunkt to statistical signifikance: ω². Res Q Exerc Sports. 1980; 51: 580–584.
25. Groffik D, Frömel K, Pelclova J. Pedometers as a method for modification of physical activity in students. J Hum Kinetics. 2008; 20: 131–137.
26. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: Understanding and improving health. USDHHS, Washington, 2000.
27. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: Understanding and improving health. USDHHS, Washington, 2010.
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966