0.829
IF
20
MNiSW
166.26
ICV
RESEARCH PAPER
 
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
 
 

Agricultural injuries in Korea and errors in systems of safety

Hyocher Kim 1, 2  ,  
Kyungsuk Lee 1,  
 
1
National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration of Korea
2
Kuopio Campus Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland
Ann Agric Environ Med 2016;23(3):432–436
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
Agriculture is known to be a dangerous industry in Korea, as well as in other countries. According to earlier studies, the root cause of occupational injury can be identified with errors in the various systems of safety, and such identification is helpful for the prevention of occupational injury.

Objective:
The aims of this study were to examine the root causes of cases of agricultural injury in Korea, based on insurance claims and identification of errors in systems of safety.

Material and Methods:
Using the Korean Mutual Aid Insurance’s injury claim database, 277 injury cases were identified, of which 68 were contacted. Root causes were categorized, using the logic tree diagramming method and the systems of safety described in the literature.

Results:
Seventy-five percent of all injuries were attributable to falls, strangulation, amputation and collision from flying and falling objects. 194 root causes were found for all injuries. The percentages of errors in all the systems of safety for each root cause were 24.7% – training/procedure, 20.3% – design, 11.9% – mitigation, 9.3% – human factor, 6.2% – maintenance/inspection, and 1.0% – warning/notification. The percentage of root causes which could not be categorized due to a shortage of information was 18.6%.

Conclusions:
It was found that most agricultural injuries were caused by a complex layer of root causes which were classified as errors in the systems of safety. This result indicates that not only training and personal protective equipment, but also regulation of safety design, mitigation devices, inspection/maintenance of workplaces, and other factors play an important role in preventing agricultural injuries. The identification of errors will help farmers to implement easily an effective prevention programme.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Hyocher Kim   
National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration of Korea
 
REFERENCES (19):
1. Chae H, Min K, Youn K, Park J, Kim K, Kim H, et al. Estimated rate of agricultural injury: the Korean Farmers’ Occupational Disease and Injury Survey. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2013; 26: 8.
2. Calvert GM, Lee K, Roh S, Davis KG, Tak S. Promoting and protecting worker health and safety in the Republic of Korea agricultural sector. J Agromedicine. 2012; 17(3): 326–337.
3. SafeWork ILO. Safety and Health in Agriculture. 2000.
4. Dekker SWA. Accidents are normal and human error does not exist: a new look at the creation of occupational safety. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2003; 9(2): 211–8.
5. Lehtola MM, Rautiainen RH, Day LM, Schonstein E, Suutarinen J, Salminen S, et al. Effectiveness of interventions in preventing injuries in agriculture—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008 Oct 14; 34(5): 327–336.
6. DeRoo LA, Rautiainen RH. A systematic review of farm safety interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 18(4): 51–62.
7. MacKenzie EJ. Epidemiology of injuries: Current trends and future challenges. Epidemiol Rev. 2000; 22(1): 112–119.
8. Osborne A, Blake C, Fullen BM, Meredith D, Phelan J, McNamara J, et al. Risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders among farm owners and farm workers: a systematic review. Am J Ind Med. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company; 2012 Mar 31; 55(4): 376–89.
9. Rautiainen RH, Ledolter J, Donham KJ, Ohsfeldt RL, Zwerling C. Risk factors for serious injury in Finnish agriculture. Am J Ind Med. 2009; 52(5): 419–428.
10. Sprince NL, Zwerling C, Lynch CF, Whitten PS, Thu K, Logsden-Sackett N, et al. Risk factors for agricultural injury: a case-control analysis of Iowa farmers in the Agricultural Health Study. J Agric Saf Health. 2003; 9(1): 165–173.
11. Mayrhofer H, Quendler E, Boxberger J. Narrative Text Analysis of Accident Reports with Tractors, Self-Propelled Harvesting Machinery and Materials Handling Machinery in Austrian Agriculture from 2008 to 2010 – A Comparison. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014; 21(1): 183–188.
12. Anderson J, Collins M, Devlin J, Renner P. Using Hazard Maps to Identify and Eliminate Workplace Hazards: A Union-Led Health and Safety Training Program. New Solut. 2012; 22(3): 325–342.
13. UMDNJ School of Public Health, Rutegers OTEC. 2009. Systems of Safety and Introduction to Logic Tree Diagraming.
14. McQuiston TH, Cable S, Cook L, Drewery K, Erwin G, Frederick J, et al. Triangle of Prevention: A Union’s Experience Promoting a Systems-of-Safety Health and Safety Program. New Solut. 2012; 22(3): 343–363.
15. McCurdy SA, Carroll DJ. Agricultural injury. Am J Ind Med. 2000; 38(4): 463–480.
16. Angoules AG, Lindner T, Vrentzos G, Papakostidis C, Giannoudis PV. Prevalence and current concepts of management of farmyard injuries. Injury. 2007; 38 Suppl 5(5): 27–34.
17. Kallioniemi MK, Raussi SM, Rautiainen RH, Kymäläinen HR. Safety and animal handling practices among women dairy operators. J Agric Saf Health. 2011; 17(1): 63.
18. Taattola K, Rautiainen RH, Karttunen JP, Suutarinen J, Viluksela MK, Louhelainen K, et al. Risk Factors for Occupational Injuries among Full-Time Farmers in Finland. J Agric Saf Health. 2012; 18(2): 83–92.
19. Kaustell KO, Mattila TEA, Rautiainen RH. Barriers and enabling factors for safety improvements on farms in Finland. J Agric Saf Health. 2011; 17(4): 327–342.
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966