RESEARCH PAPER
Occupational exposure to zoonotic agents among agricultural workers in Lombardy Region, northern Italy
1
Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano / International Centre for Rural Health, Occupational Health Unit, University Hospital ‘San Paolo’, Milan, Italy
2
Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
3
Department of Animal Pathology, Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
4
Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda – Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
5
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(4):676–681
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Objectives:
This study was conducted in Northern Italy with the aim of defining the risk of agricultural workers’ contact with biological agents through the determination of serum antibodies against selected zoonotic agents. Immunity against tetanus was also investigated.
Methods:
Two groups of agricultural workers consisting of 153 animal breeders (exposed) and 46 non- breeders (controls) were included in the study. In a first group of 103 workers (89 exposed and 14 controls) the serum concentrations of antibodies against Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) were measured, whereas in the second group of 96 workers (64 exposed and 32 controls) the serum concentrations of antibodies against Leptospira spp., Coxiella burnetii, Borrelia burgdorferi, Brucella spp. and Salmonella spp. were addressed. Imunization against tretanus was also studied in this group.
Results:
Animal breeders showed higher rates of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii (50% vs. 31.2%), and Leptospira sp. (59.4% vs. 43.7%). Results of logistic regression analysis revealed that breeder workers showed a tendency to have higher prevalence of positivity for antibodies to Leptospira spp.and Coxiella burnetii than non-breeders (ORs ~ 3). Only one exposed subject showed antibodies against hepatitis E (none in controls), but when tested with another commercially available kit the percentage of anti HEV IgG positive subjects increased to 22.3% in the exposed, while none of the controls showed positive. None of the subjects showed antibodies against Salmonella spp. and Brucella spp. Italians and other European workers have better protection against tetanus (91%) compared to non-EU workers (81%).
Conclusions:
The higher frequency of the presence of serum antibodies to zoonotic agents (e.g. Leptospira spp. and Coxiella burnetii) in animal breeders suggests that they are more exposed to biological agents than workers not involved in animal breeding activities. The risk of contact with HEV deserves further studies because the adoption of different assays can result in significantly different results. The promotion of immunization of agricultural workers might be a priority, in particular for migrants.
This study was conducted in Northern Italy with the aim of defining the risk of agricultural workers’ contact with biological agents through the determination of serum antibodies against selected zoonotic agents. Immunity against tetanus was also investigated.
Methods:
Two groups of agricultural workers consisting of 153 animal breeders (exposed) and 46 non- breeders (controls) were included in the study. In a first group of 103 workers (89 exposed and 14 controls) the serum concentrations of antibodies against Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) were measured, whereas in the second group of 96 workers (64 exposed and 32 controls) the serum concentrations of antibodies against Leptospira spp., Coxiella burnetii, Borrelia burgdorferi, Brucella spp. and Salmonella spp. were addressed. Imunization against tretanus was also studied in this group.
Results:
Animal breeders showed higher rates of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii (50% vs. 31.2%), and Leptospira sp. (59.4% vs. 43.7%). Results of logistic regression analysis revealed that breeder workers showed a tendency to have higher prevalence of positivity for antibodies to Leptospira spp.and Coxiella burnetii than non-breeders (ORs ~ 3). Only one exposed subject showed antibodies against hepatitis E (none in controls), but when tested with another commercially available kit the percentage of anti HEV IgG positive subjects increased to 22.3% in the exposed, while none of the controls showed positive. None of the subjects showed antibodies against Salmonella spp. and Brucella spp. Italians and other European workers have better protection against tetanus (91%) compared to non-EU workers (81%).
Conclusions:
The higher frequency of the presence of serum antibodies to zoonotic agents (e.g. Leptospira spp. and Coxiella burnetii) in animal breeders suggests that they are more exposed to biological agents than workers not involved in animal breeding activities. The risk of contact with HEV deserves further studies because the adoption of different assays can result in significantly different results. The promotion of immunization of agricultural workers might be a priority, in particular for migrants.
REFERENCES (50)
1.
Mołocznik A. Time of farmers’ exposure to biological factors in agricultural working environment. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2004; 11(1):85–9.
2.
World Health Organization. Zoonoses. Technical Report Series. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1959; 169.
3.
Westrell T, Ciampa N, Boelaert F, Helwigh B, Korsgaard H, Chríel M, Ammon A, Mäkelä P. Zoonotic infections in Europe in 2007: a summary of the EFSA-ECDC annual report. Euro Surveill. 2009; 14(3): pii: 19100.
4.
Taylor LH, Latham SM, Woolhouse ME. Risk Factors for Human Disease Emergence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2001; 356: 983–89.
5.
Miller A, Heptonstall J. Zoonoses. In Baxter PJ, Aw TC, Cockcroft A, Durrington P, Harrington JM (eds) Hunter’s diseases of Occupations. 10th ed. pages 750–766. London: Hodder Arnold, 2010.
6.
Kasper DL, Braunwald E, Fauci AS, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine (17th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division. 2008.
7.
Cozzi G, Ragno E. Meat Production and Market in Italy Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus. 2003; 68: 2(71–77).
8.
Rabozzi G, Bonizzi L, Crespi E, Somaruga C, Sokooti M, Tabibi R, Vellere F, Brambilla G, Colosio C. Emerging Zoonoses: the “One Health Approach”. Saf Health Work. 2012; 3(1): 77–83.
10.
Colosio C, Ariano E, Somaruga C, Rabozzi G, Vellere F, Brambilla G, Colombi A. The occupational health physician and the health surveil-lance in agriculture. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2010; 32(4 Suppl): 413–7.
11.
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Annual Epidemiological Report 2011. Reporting on 2009 surveillance data and 2010 epidemic intelligence data. Stockholm: ECDC; 2011.
12.
Antoniou M, Economou I, et al. Fourteen-year seroepidemiological study of zoonoses in a Greek village. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002; 66(1): 80–85.
14.
Meng XJ. Hepatitis E virus: animal reservoirs and zoonotic risk. Vet Microbiol. 2010; 140(3–4): 256–65.
15.
Teo CG. Hepatitis E indigenous to economically developed countries: to what extent a zoonosis? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2006; 19(5): 460–6.
16.
Drobeniuc J, Favorov MO, Shapiro CN, Bell BP, Mast EE, Dadu A, Culver D, Iarovoi P, Robertson BH, Margolis HS. Hepatitis E virus antibody prevalence among persons who work with swine. J Infect Dis. 2001; 184(12): 1594–7.
17.
Pavio N, Meng XJ, Renou C. Zoonotic hepatitis E: animal reservoirs and emerging risks.Vet Res. 2010; 41(6): 46. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
18.
Galiana C, Fernández-Barredo S, García A, Gómez MT, Pérez-Gracia MT. Occupational exposure to hepatitis E virus (HEV) in swine workers. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008; 78(6): 1012–5.
19.
La Rosa G, Muscillo M, Vennarucci VS, Garbuglia AR, La Scala P, Capobianchi MR. Hepatitis E virus in Italy: molecular analysis of travel-related and autochthonous cases. J Gen Virol. 2011; 92(Pt 7): 1617–26.
20.
Romanò L, Paladini S, Tagliacarne C, Canuti M, Bianchi S, Zanetti AR. Hepatitis E in Italy: a long-term prospective study. J Hepatol. 2011; 54(1): 34–40.
22.
Coppola RC, Masia G, Romanò L, Tanzi E, Zanetti AR. Epidemiology and prevention of enterically transmitted hepatitis in Italy. Res Virol. 1998; 149(5): 271–6.
23.
Vulcano A, Angelucci M, Candelori E, Martini V, Patti AM, Mancini C, Santi AL, Calvani A, Casagni L, Lamberti A. HEV prevalence in the general population and among workers at zoonotic risk in Latium Region. Ann Ig. 2007; 19(3): 181–6.
24.
Chen-Chun Lin, Jaw-Ching Wu, Ting-Tsung Chang, Wen-Yu Chang, Ming-Lung Yu, Albert W. Tam, Shen-Chin Wang, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Full-Young Chang, and Shou-Dong Lee. Diagnostic Value of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM Anti-Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) Tests Based on HEV RNA in an Area Where Hepatitis E Is Not Endemic. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38(11): 3915–3918.
25.
Mansuy JM, Bendall R, Legrand-Abravanel F, Sauné K, Miédouge M, Ellis V, Rech H, Destruel F, Kamar N, Dalton HR, Izopet J. Hepatitis E virus antibodies in blood donors, France. Hepatitis E virus antibodies in blood donors, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011; 17(12): 2309–12.
26.
World Health Organisation regional office for South-East Asia. Available at: http://www.searo.who.int/LinkF.... (access: 2012.08.10).
27.
Smythe L, Symonds M, Dohnt M, Barnett L, Moore M. Leptospirosis surveillance report number 8 (Queensland and Australia). Surv Report 8, Jan – Dec 99, Qld health Scientific Services, Coopers Plains, Queensland. 2000.
28.
Cerri D, Ebani V, Fratini F, Pinzauti P, Andreani E. Epidemiology of leptospirosis: observations on serological data obtained by a “diagnostic laboratory for leptospirosis” from 1995 to 2001. New Microbiol. 2003; 26: 383–389.
29.
Crevatin D, Banfi E, Crotti D, Ruaro E, Cinco M. Serosurvey on the presence of leptospiral agglutinins in humans in Northern Italy. Eur J Epidemiol. 1986; 2(1): 44–7.
30.
Ciceroni L, Stepan E, Pinto A, Pizzocaro P, Dettori G, Franzin L, Lupidi R, Mansueto S, Manera A, Ioli A, Marcuccio L, Grillo R, Ciarrocchi S, Cinco M. Epidemiological trend of human leptospirosis in Italy between 1994 and 1996. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000; 16(1): 79–86.
31.
Sambasiva RR, Naveen G, Agarwal SK. Leptospirosis in India and the rest of the world. Braz J Infect Dis. 2003; 7(3): 178–93.
32.
Monno R, Fumarola L, Trerotoli P, Cavone D, Giannelli G, Rizzo C, Ciceroni L, Musti M. Seroprevalence of Q fever, brucellosis and leptospirosis in farmers and agricultural workers in Bari, Southern Italy. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2009; 16(2): 205–9.
33.
Jansen A, Luge E, Guerra B, Wittschen P, Gruber AD, Loddenkemper C, Schneider T, Lierz M, Ehlert D, Appel B, Stark K, Nöckler K. Leptospirosis in urban wild boars, Berlin, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007; 13(5): 739–42.
34.
Aviat F, Blanchard B, Michel V, Blanchet B, Branger C, Hars J, Mansotte F, Brasme L, De Champs C, Bolut P, Mondot P, Faliu J, Rochereau S, Kodjo A, Andre-Fontaine G. Leptospira exposure in the human environment in France: A survey in feral rodents and in fresh water. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009; 32(6): 463–76.
35.
Massarani L. Brazilian genomics breakthrough offers hope for leptospirosis control. Bull World Health Organ [online]. 2004; 82(6): 471–472. www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042–96862004000600016&lng =en&nrm =iso>.
36.
McCaughey C, McKenna J, McKenna C, Coyle PV, O’Neill HJ, Wyatt DE, Smyth B, Murray LJ. Human seroprevalence to Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) in Northern Ireland. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008; 55(4): 189–94.
37.
Thomas DR, Treweek L, Salmon RL, Kench SM, Coleman TJ, Meadows D, Morgan-Capner P, Caul EO. The risk of acquiring Q fever on farms: a seroepidemiological study. Occup Environ Med. 1995; 52: 644–647.
38.
Manfredi Selvaggi T, Rezza G, Scagnelli M, et al. Investigation of a Q fever outbreak in Northern Italy. Eur J Epidemiol. 1996; 12: 403–8.
39.
Eurosurveillance, 1997; 2(2): 01. www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=138 (access: 2012.08.10).
40.
Santoro D, Giura R, Colombo MC, Antonelli P, Gramegna M, Gandola O, Gridavilla G. Q fever in Como, Northern Italy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004; 10(1): 159–60.
41.
Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. www.cdc.gov/lyme/stats/index.html (access: 2012.08.10).
42.
Pascucci I, Cammà C. Lyme disease and the detection of Borrelia burgdorferi genospecies in Ixodes ricinus ticks from central Italy. Vet Ital. 2010; 46(2):173–80, 181–8.
43.
Chmielewska-Badora J. Seroepidemiologic study on Lyme borreliosis in the Lublin region. Ann Agric Environ Med. 1998; 5(2):183–6.
44.
WHO publication. Environment and health risks from climate change and variability in Italy. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Denmark. 2007. www.li.mahidol.ac.th/thainatis/pdf-ebook/ebook48.pdf. (access: 2012.08.10).
45.
Di Renzi S, Martini A, Binazzi A, Marinaccio A, Vonesch N, D’Amico W, Moro T, Fiorentini C, Ciufolini MG, Visca P, Tomao P. Risk of acquiring tick-borne infections in forestry workers from Lazio, Italy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010; 29(12): 1579–81.
46.
Cisak E, Chmielewska-Badora J, Zwoliński J, Wojcik-Fatla A, Zajac V, Skórska C, Dutkiewicz J. Study on Lyme borreliosis focus in the Lublin region (Eastern Poland). Ann Agric Environ Med. 2008; 15 (2): 327–32.
47.
Valentino M, Rapisarda V. Tetanus in a central Italian region: scope for more effective prevention among unvaccinated agricultural workers. Occup Med (Lond). 2000; 51(2): 114–7.
48.
Murphy SM, Hegarty DM, Feighery CS, Walsh JB, Williams Y, Coakley DP. Tetanus immunity in elderly people. Age Ageing. 1995; 24(2): 99–102.
49.
Centers for Disease Control. Tetanus-United States, 1987 and 1988. MMWR 1990; 39: 37–41.
50.
Sangalli M, Chierchini P, Aylward RB, Forastiere F. Tetanus: a rare but preventable cause of mortality among drug users and the elderly. Eur J Epidemiol. 1996; 12(5): 539–40.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.