RESEARCH PAPER
Environmental Risks Perception – A Study of the awareness of families to threats in areas with increased health disorders in children
| 1 | Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland |
| 2 | Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland |
| 3 | Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Grzegorz Dziubanek
Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(3):555–558
KEYWORDS
children’ health disordersenvironmental risk perceptionenvironmental threatsSilesiaProvinceair pollution
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Children are at greater risk than adults to experience adverse effects from environmental agents. Significant neurological damage to children can occur even at very low levels of exposure. Reliable protection of children living in areas with high environmental hazards is not possible without their parent’s’ understanding of where, how and why children’s exposures occur.
Objectives:
The aim of the presented study was to indicate families’ awareness of environmental risks with increased health disorders in children in the chosen area of the Silesian Province.
Material and Methods:
Rates of development disorders in general, including physical and psychomotor development disorders, in a population of children from the study area were estimated. A questionnaire was used in order to explore through a door-to-door survey the perceptions of environmental risk in a population of 2,491 residents.
Results:
The presented study shows that the parents’ awareness of environmental health risks is not satisfactory. The majority expressed an opinion that the outdoor environment exerts a major influence upon the state of health, but less than 1% of the parents were aware of the indoor environmental risk.
Conclusions:
The most effective way to prevent children’s exposure is to teach the community to identify environmental threats and educate them on how to their protect children. The appropriate policies and programmes should be developed and implemented as this seems to be the most effective and cheapest way to prevent children’s exposure to environmental risks.
Children are at greater risk than adults to experience adverse effects from environmental agents. Significant neurological damage to children can occur even at very low levels of exposure. Reliable protection of children living in areas with high environmental hazards is not possible without their parent’s’ understanding of where, how and why children’s exposures occur.
Objectives:
The aim of the presented study was to indicate families’ awareness of environmental risks with increased health disorders in children in the chosen area of the Silesian Province.
Material and Methods:
Rates of development disorders in general, including physical and psychomotor development disorders, in a population of children from the study area were estimated. A questionnaire was used in order to explore through a door-to-door survey the perceptions of environmental risk in a population of 2,491 residents.
Results:
The presented study shows that the parents’ awareness of environmental health risks is not satisfactory. The majority expressed an opinion that the outdoor environment exerts a major influence upon the state of health, but less than 1% of the parents were aware of the indoor environmental risk.
Conclusions:
The most effective way to prevent children’s exposure is to teach the community to identify environmental threats and educate them on how to their protect children. The appropriate policies and programmes should be developed and implemented as this seems to be the most effective and cheapest way to prevent children’s exposure to environmental risks.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
WHO, 2009. 3rd International WHO Conference on Environmental Threats to the Health of Children. Busan, Republic of Korea, 7–10 June 2009.
2.
Landrigan PJ, Suk WA, Amler RW. Chemical wastes, children’s health, and the Superfund Basic Research Program. Environ Health Perspect. 1999; 107(6): 423–7.
3.
Bellinger DC. Neurological and behavioral consequences of childhood lead exposure. PLoS Med. 2008a; 5(5): e115.
4.
Bellinger DC. Very low lead exposures and children’s neurodevelopment. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008b; 20: 172–177.
5.
Chen AB, Cai B, Dietrich KN, Radcliffe J, Rogan WJ. Lead exposure, IQ, and behavior in urban 5–7 year olds: does lead affect behavior only by lowering IQ? Pediatrics. 2007; 119: e650–e658.
6.
Lanphear BP, Hornung R, Khoury J, Yolton K, Baghurst P, Bellinger DC, et al. Low-level environmental lead exposure and children’s intellectual function: an international pooled analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113: 894–899.
7.
Boersma ER, Lanting CI. Environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins. Consequences for longterm neurological and cognitive development of the child lactation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2000; 478: 271–87.
8.
Herbstman JB, et al. Prenatal exposure to PBDEs and neurodevelopment. Environ Health Perspect. 2010; 118(5): 712–719.
9.
Arisawa K, Takeda H, Mikasa H. Background exposure to PCDDs/PCDFs/PCBs and its potential health effects: a review of epidemiologic studies. J Med Invest. 2005 Feb; 52(1–2): 10–2.
10.
Landrigan P, et al. A research strategy to discover the environmental causes of autism and neurodevelopmental disabilities. Environ Health Perspect. 2012; 120: a258-a260.
11.
WSSE Report. Air Pollution in Katowice Voivodship. Katowice 1990–1998; 2000 (in Polish).
12.
WSSE Report. Air Pollution in Silesia Voivodship. Katowice 1999–2006; 2007 (in Polish).
13.
Wyżgolik B. Heavy metals contamination of the soil in Dąbrowa Górnicza. Środowisko i Rozwój. 2000; 1–2 (in Polish).
14.
Fewtrell L, Kaufmann R, Prüss-Üstün A. Lead: assessing the environmental burden of disease at national and local level. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2003(WHO Environmental Burden of Disease Series, No. 2).
15.
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). Interim review of scientific information on lead UNEP DTIE/CHEMICALS, October 2006.
16.
Perera FP, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, Wei-Yann Tsai, Tang D, Diaz D, et al. Effect of Prenatal Exposure to Airborne Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons on Neurodevelopment in the First 3 Years of Life among Inner-City Children. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 114(8): 1287–1292.
17.
Ten Tusscher GW, Koppe JG. Perinatal dioxin exposure and later effects-a review. Chemosphere 2004; 54(9): 1329–1336.
18.
Wcislo E, Dutkiewicz T, Konczalik J. Indicator-Based Assessment of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects in the Industrial Cities of Upper Silesia, Poland. Environ Health Perspect. 2002; 110(11): 1133–40.
19.
Marchwińska–Wyrwał E, Hajok I, Dziubanek G, Wolny A, Rusin M, Oleksiuk K, Baranowska R, Złotkowska R. The relationship between population health status and quality of the environment characterized by air pollution. In: Aspects of Public Health. Wydawnictwo Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach; 2012. (in Polish).
20.
Barrett JR. Reaching Accord on the Ethical Conduct of Child Observational Research. Environ Health Perspect. 2009; 117: A354-A357.
21.
Leech JA, Nelson WC, Burnett RT, Aaron S, Raizenne ME. It’s about time: a comparison of Canadian and American time-activity patterns. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2002; 12(6): 427–32.
22.
Leung R, Koenig JQ, Simcox N, van Belle G, Fenske R, Gilbert SG. Behavioral changes following participation in a home health promotional program in King County, Washington. Environ Health Perspect. 1997; 105(10): 1132–5.
24.
George CLS, White M, Kulhankova K, Mahajan A, Thorne PS, Snyder JM, Kline JN. Early exposure to a non hygienic environment alters pulmonary immunity and allergic responses. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006; 291(3): 512 – 522.
25.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). Clearing the Air: Asthma and Indoor Air Exposures. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
26.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). Damp Indoor Spaces and Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2004.
27.
Thorne PS, Kulhankova K, Yin M, Cohn R, Arbes SJ Jr, Zeldin DC. Endotoxin exposure is a risk factor for asthma: the national survey of endotoxin in United States housing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005; 172: 1371–1377.
28.
Wu F, Takaro TK. Childhood Asthma and Environmental Interventions. Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115(6): 971–5.
29.
Żakiewicz-Sobczak W, Krasowska E, Zwoliński J, et al. Allergic diseases- current state of knowledge. Postep Derm Alergol. 2012; 6: 451–455.
30.
Lis G, Twarduś K. Allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in schoolchildren. Part II. Relationship to spitometric parameters, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and biomarkers of allergic inflammation. Pozt Dermatol Alergol. 2011; 6: 455–461.
31.
Pałgan K, Bartuzi Z. The role of flavonoids in asthma. Post Dermatol Alergol. 2011; 6: 396–401.
32.
Needham LL, Barr DB, Caudill SP, Pirkle JL, Turner WE, Osterloh J, Jones RL, Sampson EJ. Concentrations of environmental chemicals associated with neurodevelopmental effects in U.S. population. Neurotoxicology. 2005; 26(4): 531–45.
33.
Braun JM, Froehlich TE, Daniels JL, Dietrich KN, Hornung R, Auinger P, Lanphear BP. Association of Environmental Toxicants and Conduct Disorder in U.S. Children: NHANES 2001–2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2008; 116(7): 956–962.
34.
Hornung RW, Lanphear BP, Dietrich KN. Age of Greatest Susceptibility to Childhood Lead Exposure: A New Statistical Approach. Environ Health Perspect. 2009; 117(8): 309–12.
35.
Hirschfeld S, Songco D, Kramer BS, Guttmacher AE. National Children’s Study: update in 2010. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011; 78: 119–125.
36.
Boyle C, et al. Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in U.S. children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics; 2011; 127(6): 1034–1042.
37.
Fenske RA, Bradman A, Whyatt RM, Wolff MS. Lessons learned for the assessment of children’s pesticide exposure: critical sampling and analytical issues for future studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113(10): 1455–62.
38.
Norton DE, Froelicher ES, Waters CM, Carrieri-Kohlman V. Parental influence on models of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in children. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003; 2(4): 311–22.
39.
Galvez MP, Peters R, Graber N, Forman J. Effective risk communication in children’s environmental health: lessons learned from 9/11. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2007; 54(1): 33–46.
40.
Paulson JA, Arnesen SJ. The use of the Internet for children’s health and the environment. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2007; 54(1): 135–53.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.