Online first
Current issue
Archive
Special Issues
About the Journal
Publication Ethics
Anti-Plagiarism system
Instructions for Authors
Instructions for Reviewers
Editorial Board
Editorial Office
Contact
Reviewers
All Reviewers
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
General Data Protection Regulation (RODO)
RESEARCH PAPER
Comparison of farmers workload by manual and mechanical tasks on family farms
1
Central Intitute for Labour Protection – National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
2
Univeristy of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(2):356-360
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare the workload between tasks undertaken manually and those with the assistance of mechanical devices. The results indicate that the workload during the tasks assisted by mechanisation was usually very low or relatively low. Statistical analysis showed the impact of the way of the work performance on the workload. However, the results also indicate that the workload is not evenly distributed: the effort relating to the working tasks is larger in relation to the work of women than men. The need for mechanisation of the tasks performed by women is higher than that for the mechanisation of tasks performed by men. The type of work performance (manual, or technically assisted) did not clearly show significant differences in the workload. This surprising result indicates that the technical devices used on many farms are still far from perfect. It is concluded that assisting work with mechanical devices reduces the workload of farmers, but the way of work performance (manual or mechanical) was not statistically significant.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Wójcicki Z. Modernizacja gospodarstw rodzinnych. Probl Inż Rol. 2010; 1(67): 13–18.
2.
Byszewski W, Haman J. Gleba, maszyna, roślina. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa 1977.
3.
Guiness Worlds Records, http://www.guinnessworldrecord... records-1/combine-harvesting-%28wheat%29-team-in-eight-hours/; 1 September 2011, UK (access: 02.02.2012).
4.
Pawlak J. Role of mechanization in the development of agriculture (in Polish). Rocz Nauk Rol. 2010; Seria G, 97(2): 165–175.
5.
Luder W. Heu abladen mit dem Dosiergerät: Hohe Kosten statt Schwerarbeit? FAT – Berichte 352. Edig. Forschungsanstalt für Betribswirtschaft und Landtechnik (FAT), Tänikon 1988.
6.
Luder W, Huber R, Juliszewski T. Untersuchungen über die Arbeitsbelastung beim Melken. In: Proceedings of XXII CIOSTA-CIGR V Congress, 1986: 538–544, Stuttgart – Hohenheim 1986.
7.
Calisto C. Ergonomic investigation in fruit growing. Musculoskeletal disorders and their risk factor. Verlag Grauer, Stuttgart 1999.
8.
Juliszewski T. Udoskonalenia techniczne w gospodarstwach rolnych a obciążenie pracą. In: Bujak F, Zagórski J (Eds): Obciążenie fizyczne i psychiczne pracą w rolnictwie, 151–156. Instytut Medycyny Wsi. Lublin 2001.
9.
Groborz A, Juliszewski T. Tętno jako wskaźnik obciążenia pracą w fermie krów mlecznych. Inż Rol. 2005; 10(70): 107–115.
10.
Groborz A, Juliszewski T. Obciążenie pracą w fermie drobiu. In: Trendy vo vyskume a vyvoji polnohospodarskych strojov a technologii v ekosysteme kulturnej krajiny, Dudince, 2–3 June 2005: 82–90.
11.
Groborz A, Juliszewski T. The workload of women in Polish farms. In: Proceeding of IV International Congress on Women Work & Health, New Delhi, 27–30 November 2005, 298.
12.
Groborz A, Juliszewski T, Gonciarz M. Analiza obciążeń pracą na podstawie wskaźnika wykorzystania rezerwy tętna i obciążeń statycznych metodą OWAS. Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems 2005, Journal edited by Medical College-Jagiellonian University, 1(1): 291–296.
13.
Holmér I, Gavhed D: Classification of metabolic and respiratory demands in fire fighting activity with extreme workloads. Applied Ergonom. 2007; 38: 45–52.
15.
Iwakiri K, Sotoyama M, Mori I, Saito S. Does leanin posture on the kitchen counter alleviate workload on the low back and legs during dishwashing? Industrial Health 2007; 45: 535–545.
16.
Bhatt H, Sidhu M, Sandhu P, Bakhshi R. Assessment of physiological stress parameters of female workers engaged in selected cooking activities. Stud Home Com Sci. 2011; 5(2): 73–77.
17.
Urząd Statystyczny w Krakowie. 2006. Charakterystyka gospodarstw rolnych w województwie małopolskim w 2005 r. Data opracowania: kwiecień 2006 r. Internet: http://www.stat.gov.pl/urzedy/....
18.
Badanie pracy. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne. Warszawa 1961. (original title: Introduction to Work Study). International Labour Organisation.
19.
Tippett LHC. Statistical Methods in Textil Research. Part 3A. Metoda obserwacji migawkowych w zastosowaniu do mierzenia pracy maszyn i robotników w przedsiębiorstwach, Shirley Institute Memoirs 13(4), Manchester 1934.
21.
Hartsought B, Parker RJ. Pruning Douglas Fir. New Zealand Logging Industry Research Organisation Technical Note TN-10, Rotorua 1993.
22.
Vitalis A, Pournaras ND, Jeffrey GB, Tsagarakis G, Monastiriotis G, Kavvadiast S. Heart rate strain in Greek steel-workers. Ergonomics 1994; 21(5): 845–850.
23.
Kaukiainen A, Sillanpää J, Lappalainen J, Viljanen M, Nyberg M. New equipment to lighten the work load of construction workers. Int J Occup Safety Ergonom. (JOSE) 2002; 8(2): 209–224.
24.
Karvonen MJ, Kentala E, Mustala O. The effect of training on heart rate. A longitudinal study. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn. 1957; 35: 307–315.
25.
Vitalis A. The use of heart rate as the main predictor of the cost of work. In: Proceedings of the inaugural conference of the NZ ergonomics society, Aukland, February 1987: 168–181, Aukland.
26.
Kirk PM, Sullman MJM. Heart rate strain in cable hauler choker setters in New Zeland logging operations. App Ergonom. 2001; 32: 389–398.
27.
Kapitaniak B. Heart Rate as Strain Index. In: Karwowski W (Ed): International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors. Taylor & Francis. London and New York. 2001.
28.
Buchberger J. Die Beurteilung von Arbeitsbeanspruchungen aufgrund der kontinuierlich registrierten Herzschlagfrequenz. Arbeitsärztlicher Dienst des BIGA, Bern. Arbeitsmedizinische Informationen 1984: 12.
29.
Baum T. Obciążenie pracą kobiety wiejskiej związane z jej udziałem w produkcji roślinnej i zwierzęcej. Med Wiejska 1980; XV(2): 135.
30.
Baum T. Ergonomiczne uwarunkowania pracy w zmechanizowanych technologiach produkcji roślinnej. Rozprawa habilitacyjna. Instytut Medycyny Wsi. Lublin 1992.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No NrRCN/SP/0532/2021/1 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2025 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
