Comparison of antibacterial-coated and non-coated suture material in intraoral surgery by isolation of adherent bacteria
More details
Hide details
Institute for Microbiology and Hygiene, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Corresponding author
Klaus Pelz   

Institute for Microbiology and Hygiene, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg, Germany
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(3):551-555
In general surgery the incidence of postoperative wound infections is reported to be lower using triclosan-coated sutures. In intraoral surgery, sutures are faced with different bacterial species and the question arises whether the antibacterial-coated suture material has the same positive effects.

Material and Methods:
Triclosan-coated and uncoated suture materials were applied in 17 patients undergoing wisdom tooth extraction. Postoperatively, sutures were removed and adherent bacteria were isolated, colony-forming units (cfu) were counted, and species identified.

Oral bacteria were found in high numbers (cfu>107) on both Vicryl and the triclosan-coated Vicryl Plus. The total number of bacteria isolated from Vicryl Plus was 37% higher than for Vicryl, mainly due to increased numbers of anaerobes. The number of bacterial strains identified was higher for Vicryl ( n=203) than for Vicryl Plus (n=198), but the number of pathogens was higher on Vicryl Plus (n=100) than on Vicryl (n=97). Fewer Gram-positive strains were found on Vicryl Plus (n=95) than on Vicryl (n=107) and, conversely, more Gram-negative strains on Vicryl Plus (103vs.96).

In terms of the total number of oral bacteria, and especially oral pathogens, that adhered to suture material, no reduction was demonstrated for Vicryl Plus. The use of triclosan-coated suture material offers no advantage in intraoral surgery.

Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. J Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002; 15: 167–193.
Giglio JA, Rowland RW, Dalton HP, Laskin DM. Suture removal-induced bacteremia: A possible endocarditis risk. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992; 123: 65–66, 69–70.
King RC, Crawford JJ, Small EW. Bacteremia following intraoral suture removal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988; 65: 23–28.
Otten JE, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Janke H, Pelz K. Bacterial colonization on different suture materials–a potential risk for intraoral dentoalveolar surgery. J Biomed Mat Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2005; 74B: 627–635.
Zhan C, Miller MR. Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. JAMA. 2003; 290: 1868–1874.
Edmiston CHE, Seabrook GR, Gohen MP, Krepel CJ, Johnson ChP, Lewis BD, et al. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: Can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination? J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 481–489.
Rothenburger S, Spangler D, Bhende S, Burkley D. In vitro antimicrobial evaluation of coated VICRYL PLUS antibacterial suture using zone of inhibition assays. Surg Infect. 2002; (3 Suppl 1): 79–87.
Storch M, Rothenburger SJ, Jacinto G. Experimental efficacy study of coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture in guinea pig challenged with Staphylococcus aureus. Surg Infect. 2004; 5: 281–288.
Rozzelle CJ, Leonardo J, Li V. Antimicrobial suture wound closure for cerebrospinal fluid shunt. J Neurosurg Pediatrics. 2008; 2: 111–117.
Venema S, Abbas F, Van De Belt-Gritter B, Van Der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Van Hoogmoed CG. In Vitro Oral Biofilm Formation on Triclosan-Coated Sutures in the Absence and Presence of Additional Antiplaque Treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69(4): 980–985. DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.030.
Walker C, Borden LC, Zambon JJ, Bonta CY, De Vizio W, Volpe AR. The effects of a 0,3% triclosan-containing dentifrice on the microbial composition of supragingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol. 1994; 21: 334–341.
Otten JE, Pelz K, Christmann G. Anaerobic bacteraemia following tooth extraction and removal of osteosynthesis plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987; 45: 477–480.
Gilbert T P, McBain AJ. Literature-based evaluation of the potential risks associated with impregnation of medical devices and implants with triclosan. Surg Infect. 2002; (3 Suppl 1): 55–63.
Barbolt TA. Chemistry and safety of triclosan, and its use as an antimicrobial coating on coated VICRYL PLUS antibacterial suture. Surg Infect. 2002; (3Suppl 1): 45–55.
Gomez-Alonso A, Garcia-Criado FJ, Parreno-Manchado FC, Garcia-Sanchez E, Garcia-Sanchez JE, Parreno-Manchado A, et al. Study of the efficacy of coated Vicryl Plus antibacterial suture in two animal models of general surgery. J Infect. 2007; 54: 82–88.
Copitch JL, Whitehead RN, Webber MA. Prevalence of decreased susceptibility to triclosan in Salmonella enterica isolates from animals and humans and assosciation with multiple drug resistence. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010; 36(3): 247–251.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top