RESEARCH PAPER
Legionella pneumophilla bacteria in a thermal saline bath
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
 
2
Department of Geology and Hydrogeology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Maciej Walczak   

Department of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
 
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(4):649-652
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Objective:
The study was aimed at determining whether Legionella pneumophila bacteria can be found in thermal saline waters used in balneotherapy.

Methods:
Water samples were collected from three thermal saline baths, supplied by thermal saline waters (type Cl – Na). The total number of bacteria was determined in the direct microscopic count under a fluorescence microscope The numbers of bacteria belonging to different phylogenetic groups (Eubacteria, Legionella sp. and Legionella pneumophila) were determined with the use of a molecular FISH method.

Results:
The highest average total number of bacteria as well as the highest average number of Eubacteria in the entire research cycle was recorded in bath 1. Bacteria belonging to the Legionella genus along with Legionella pneumophila were identified in all water samples collected from each bath. Moreover, biofilm containing cells of L. pneumophilla was identified in the collected water samples.

Conclusions:
The number of bacteria in water increases with the bath’s age. The Legionella pneumophila can successfully develop not only in fresh water bodies but in thermal saline baths as well. Still, it is uncertain whether the commonly applied culture method, developed for freshwater bodies, is also suitable for thermal saline baths.

REFERENCES (18)
1.
Saint CP, Ho L. A PCR test for identification and discrimination of Legionella longbeachae serogroups 1 and 2. J Microbiol Metod. 1999; 7: 245–3.
 
2.
Huang L, Boyd D, Amyot WM, Hempstead AD, Luo Z, O’Connor TJ, Chen C, Machner M, Montminy T, Isberg RR. The E Block motif is associated with Legionella pneumophila translocated substrates. Cell Microbiol. 2011; 13: 227–45.
 
3.
Papciak D, Zamorska J. Podstawy biologii i biotechnologii środowiskowej. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, Rzeszow, 2005.p.54–69.
 
4.
Heuner K, Steinert M. The flagellum of Legionella pneumophila and its link to the expression of the virulent phenotype. Int J Med Microbiol. 2003; 293: 133–43.
 
5.
Yaňez M, Carrasco–Serrano AC, Barbera V, Catalan V. Quantitative detection of Legionella pneumophila in water samples by immunomagnetic purification and real – time PCR amplification of the dotA gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71: 3433–41.
 
6.
Declerck P. Biofilms: the environmental playground of Legionella pneumophila. Environ Microbiol. 2010; 12: 557–66.
 
7.
Steinert M, Hentschel U, Hacker J. Legionella pneumophila: an aquatic microbe goes astray. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002; 26: 149–62.
 
8.
Flemming HC, Wingeneder J, Mayer C, KÖrstgens V, Borchard W. Cohesiveness in biofilm matrix polymers. In: Allison DG, Lapin – Scott HM, Wilson M. Society for General Microbiology Symposium: Community Structure and Co – Operation in Biofilms. University Press, Cambridge, UK: 2000.p.88–106.
 
9.
Grimm D, Ludwig W, Brandt BC, Michel R, Schleifer KH, Hacker J, Steinert M. Development of 18S rRNA-targeted Oligonucleotide Probes for Specific Detection of Hartmannella and Naegleria in Legionella – positive Environmental Samples, Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2001; 24: 76–82.
 
10.
Barbaree JM, Sanchez A, Sanden GN. Tolerance of Legionella Species to Sodium Chloride. Curr Microbiol. 1983; 9: 1–5.
 
11.
Palmer CJ, Tsai Y, Paszko-Kolva C, Mayer C, Sangermano LR. Detection of Legionella Species in Sewage and Ocean Water by Polymerase Chain Reaction, Direct Fluorescent-Antibody, and Plate Culture Methods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993; 93: 3618–24.
 
12.
Guyard C, Low DE. Legionella infections and travel associated legionellosis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2011; 9: 176–88.
 
13.
Misiurkiewicz-Stypułkowska H, Krogulska B, Pancer K, Matuszewska R. Metodyka wykrywania i oznaczania bakterii z rodzaju Legionella w środowisku wodnym i w materiale klinicznym. Wyd. Met.PZH, Warszawa 2001.p.33–47.
 
14.
Declerck P, Behets J, Hoef V, Ollevier F. Detection of Legionella spp. and some of their amoeba hosts in floating biofilms from anthropogenic and natural aquatic environments. Water Res. 2007; 41: 3159–67.
 
15.
Huang SW, Hsu BM, Wu SF, Fan CW, Shih FC, Lin YC, Ji DD. Water quality parameters associated with prevalence of Legionella in hot spring facility water bodies. Water Res. 2010; 44: 4805–11.
 
16.
Exner M, Hartemann P. Summary of the second meeting of the International Forum on Water Hygiene in Buildings (IFOWAHB) from 01 to 02.06.2007 in Stockholm, Meeteing Report. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2009; 212: 449–458.
 
17.
Meenhorst PL, Reingold AL, Groothuis DG, Gorman GW, Wilkinson HW, McKinney RM, Feeley JC, Brenner DJ, Van Furth R. Water – related nosocomial pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1 and 10. J Infect Dis. 1985; 152: 356–64.
 
18.
Patterson WJ, Seal DV, Curran E, Sinclair TM, McLuckie JC. Fatal nosocomial Legionnaires disease: relevance of contamination of hospital water supply by temperature – dependent buoyancy – driven flow from spur pipes. Epidemiol Infec. 1994; 112: 513–25.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top