RESEARCH PAPER
Validation of the Polish language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Traumatology and Neuroorthopaedics, Rydygier Specialistic Hospital, Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
3
Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, 5 th Military Hospital, Krakow, Poland
4
Department of Medical Didactics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(4):866–870
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
Introduction and objective:
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires have become the standard measure for treatment effectiveness after spinal surgery. One of the most widely used generic PROs is the SF-36 Health Survey. The aim of this study was to specifically focus on validating the SF-36 Health Survey to confirm that the tool is an acceptable and psychometrically robust measure to collect HRQoL data in Polish patients with spinal stenosis.

Material and Methods:
Patients were eligible if they were above 18 years of age and had been qualified for spine surgery of the lumbar region due to either discopathy or non-traumatic spinal stenosis. All patients filled-in the Polish version of the SF-36 and a demographic questionnaire. Standard validity and reliability analyses were performed.

Results:
192 patients (83 women – 43.2%) agreed to take part in the study (mean age: 57.5±11.4 years). In 47 patients (24.5%), using MRI, ossification of the ligamenta flava were found. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients showed positive internal consistency (0.70–0.92). Interclass correlations for the SF-36 ranged from 0.72 – 0.86 and proved appropriate test-retest reliability. Satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity in multi-trait scaling analyses was seen.

Conclusions:
The Polish version of the SF-36 is a reliable and valid tool for measuring HRQoL in patients with spinal stenosis. It can be recommended for use in clinical and epidemiological settings in the Polish population. However, caution is warranted when interpreting the results of the ‘role limitations due to physical health problems’ and the ‘role limitations due to emotional problems’ scales because of floor and ceiling effects.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Krzysztof A. Tomaszewski   
Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
 
REFERENCES (22):
1. Godil SS, Parker SL, Zuckerman SL, Mendenhall SK, Devin CJ, Asher AL, et al. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy. Spine J. 2013; 13(9): 1006–1012.
2. Grönblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P, Järvinen E, Lukinmaa A, Kouri JP, et al. Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain. 1993; 9(3): 189–195.
3. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24): 3130–3139.
4. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51(11): 1055–1068.
5. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Outcomes of cancer treatment for technology assessment and cancer treatment guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14(2): 671–679.
6. Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery. 2009; 146(3): 435–443.
7. Korolija D, Wood-Dauphinee S, Pointner R. Patient-reported outcomes. How important are they? Surg Endosc. 2007; 21(4): 503–507.
8. Wright JG. Outcomes research: what to measure. World J Surg. 1999; 23(12): 1224–1226.
9. Tylka J, Piotrowicz R. Quality of life SF-36 questionnaire – the Polish version. Kardiol Pol. 2009; 67(10): 1166–1169 (in Polish).
10. Püsküllüoğlu M, Tomaszewski KA, Bottomley A, Holden L, Tomaszewska IM, Głowacki R, et al. Validation of the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 module for the assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases. Qual Life Res. 2013. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0486-6.
11. Chmielowska K, Tomaszewski KA, Pogrzebielski A, Brandberg Y, Romanowska-Dixon B. Translation and validation of the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-OPT30 module for the assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with uveal melanoma. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013; 22(1): 88–96.
12. Paradowska D, Tomaszewski KA, Bałajewicz-Nowak M, Bereza K, Tomaszewska IM, Paradowski J, et al. Validation of the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-CX24 module for the assessment of health-related quality of life in women with cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2013. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12103.
13. Sakamaki T, Sairyo K, Sakai T, Tamura T, Okada Y, Mikami H. Measurements of ligamentum flavum thickening at lumbar spine using MRI. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129(10): 1415–1419.
14. Johnson CD, Aaronson N, Blazeby JM, Bottomley A, Fayers P, Koller M, et al. Guidelines for developing Quality of Life Questionnaires. 4th ed. Brussels (EORTC Publications), 2011.
15. Fayers P, Machin D. Quality of Life: The Assessment Analysis and Interpretation of Patient Reported Outcomes. Chichester (Wiley), 2007.
16. Tabachnick BG. Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. London (HarperCollins), 2011.
17. Pappa E, Kontodimopoulos N, Niakas D. Validating and norming of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(5): 1433–1438.
18. Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005; 14(3): 875–882.
19. Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bottomley A, de Graeff A, Groenvold M, et al. The relationship between overall quality of life and its subdimensions was influenced by culture: analysis of an international database. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(8): 788–795.
20. Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bjorner J, et al. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51(11): 1149–1158.
21. Kang KC, Lee CS, Shin SK, Park SJ, Chung CH, Chung SS. Ossification of the ligamentum flavum of the thoracic spine in the Korean population. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 14(4): 513–519.
22. Baron R, Elashaal A, Germon T, Hobart J. Measuring outcomes in cervical spine surgery: think twice before using the SF-36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(22): 2575–2584.
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966