REVIEW PAPER
The social origin of the illness experience – an outline of problems
1
Chair of Sociology of Ethnic Groups and Civil Society, Institute of Sociology, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
2
Independent Medical Sociology Unit, Medical University in Lublin, Poland
Corresponding author
Michał Skrzypek
Chair of Sociology of Ethnic Groups and Civil Society, Institute of Sociology, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Chair of Sociology of Ethnic Groups and Civil Society, Institute of Sociology, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(3):654-660
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
The main research objective is a study of social influences on the processes of experiencing illness in the sociological meaning of the term ‘illness experience’ focusing attention on the subjective activity inspired by being ill, taking into account interpretive (meaning-making) activity. The goal of the analysis is to specify ‘social actors’ jointly creating the phenomena of ‘illness’ and ‘being ill’, taking into consideration the evolution of the position of medical sociology on this issue.
Brief description of the state of knowledge:
The ways of experiencing illness in contemporary society, including processes of creating the meanings of the phenomena of ‘illness’ and ‘being ill’, are the outcome of not only the application of biomedical knowledge, but are also parallelly a sociocultural ‘construct’ in the sense that they are under the impact of social and cultural influences. In the sociology of illness experience it is pointed out that illness experience develops in connection with experiencing somatic discomfort, this process occurring in the context of influences of culture, society and socially accepted norms and values. These relationships are interpreted by the sociological, interactionist model which presents illness as a ‘social construct’.
Conclusions:
Sociological studies on the social construction of ‘illness’ and ‘being ill’ construct a model of these phenomena, complementary to the biomedical model, conducive to the validation of the patient’s perspective in the processes of medical treatment, and to the humanization of the naturalistically oriented, biomedical approach to illness, i.e. to adjust it more accurately to typically human needs manifesting themselves in the situation of being ill.
The main research objective is a study of social influences on the processes of experiencing illness in the sociological meaning of the term ‘illness experience’ focusing attention on the subjective activity inspired by being ill, taking into account interpretive (meaning-making) activity. The goal of the analysis is to specify ‘social actors’ jointly creating the phenomena of ‘illness’ and ‘being ill’, taking into consideration the evolution of the position of medical sociology on this issue.
Brief description of the state of knowledge:
The ways of experiencing illness in contemporary society, including processes of creating the meanings of the phenomena of ‘illness’ and ‘being ill’, are the outcome of not only the application of biomedical knowledge, but are also parallelly a sociocultural ‘construct’ in the sense that they are under the impact of social and cultural influences. In the sociology of illness experience it is pointed out that illness experience develops in connection with experiencing somatic discomfort, this process occurring in the context of influences of culture, society and socially accepted norms and values. These relationships are interpreted by the sociological, interactionist model which presents illness as a ‘social construct’.
Conclusions:
Sociological studies on the social construction of ‘illness’ and ‘being ill’ construct a model of these phenomena, complementary to the biomedical model, conducive to the validation of the patient’s perspective in the processes of medical treatment, and to the humanization of the naturalistically oriented, biomedical approach to illness, i.e. to adjust it more accurately to typically human needs manifesting themselves in the situation of being ill.
REFERENCES (53)
1.
Hankin JR, Wright ER. Reflections on fifty years of medical sociology. J Health Soc Beh. 2010; 51(S): 10–14.
2.
Nettleton S. The sociology of health and illness. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.p.18–20, 27.
3.
Brown P. Naming and framing: the social construction of diagnosis and illness. J Health Soc Beh. 1995; Extra Issue: 34–52.
4.
Conrad P, Barker KK. The social construction of illness: Key insights and policy implications. J Health Soc Beh. 2010; 51: 67–79.
5.
Kleinman A, Seeman D. Personal experience of illness. In: Albrecht GL, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw SC (eds.). Handbook of social studiesin health and medicine. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage, 2003.p. 231, 234.
6.
Piątkowski W, Skrzypek M. Utilization of non-medical healing methods as a way of coping with life difficulties in the socially deprived ‘losers’ of the systemic transformation processes in Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(1): 147–157.
7.
Piątkowski W, Skrzypek M. The social nature of health and illness – evolution of research approaches in Polish classical medical sociology. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(4): 821–835.
8.
Berger PL, Luckman T. Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości. PIW, Warszawa 1983 (in Polish).
9.
Swatos WH. Constructionism. In: Ritzer G. (ed.). The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Malden: Blackwell 2007.p.686–687.
11.
Pierret J. Constructing discourses about health and their social determinants. In: Radley A (ed.). Worlds of illness. Biographical and cultural perspectives on health and disease. London–New York, Routledge, 1995.p.9–26.
12.
Twaddle AC, Hessler RM. A sociology of health. Saint Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company, 1977: 50–51.
13.
Uramowska-Żyto B., Diagnoza medyczna. Studia Socjol. 1981; 3(82): 145–157 (in Polish).
14.
Chang VW, Christakis NA. Medical modeling of obesity: a transition from an action to experience in a 20 th century American medical textbook. Soc Health Ill. 2002; 24(2): 151–177.
15.
Nettleton S. ‘I just want permission to be ill’: Towards a sociology of medically unexplained symptoms. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62(5): 1167–1178.
16.
Zavestoski S, Brown P, McCormick S, Mayer B, D’Ottavi M, Lucove JC. Patient activism and the struggle for diagnosis: Gulf War illnesses and other medically unexplained physical symptoms in the US. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 58(1): 161–175.
17.
Brown P, Morello-Frosch R, Zavestoski S. et al. Health social movements: advancing traditional medical sociology concepts. In: Pescosolido BA, Martin JK, McLeod JD, Rogers A (eds.). Handbook of the sociology of health, illness, and healing. A blueprint for the 21 st century. New York, Springer, 2011.p.117–137.
18.
Illich I. Medical nemesis. The expropriation of health. London, Calder and Boyars, 1975.
19.
Lalonde M. A new perspective on the health of Canadians. A working document. Ottawa, Government of Canada, April 1974 (Cat. No H31–1374).
20.
Goffman E. Instytucje totalne. O pacjentach szpitali psychiatrycznych i mieszkańcach innych instytucji totalnych. Sopot, GWP, 2011 (in Polish).
21.
Sokołowska M. Granice medycyny. Warszawa, Wiedza Powszechna 1980.p.199–200 (in Polish).
22.
Rogers A, Pilgrim D. Medical sociology and its relationship to other disciplines: The case of mental health and the ambivalent relationship between sociology and psychiatry. In: Pescosolido BA, Martin JK, McLeod JD, Rogers A (eds.). Handbook of the sociology of health, illness, and healing. A blueprint for the 21 st century. New York, Springer, 2011.p. 22, 27.
23.
Becker H. Outsiderzy. Studia z socjologii dewiacji Warszawa, PWN, 2009 (in Polish).
24.
Jutel A. Sociology of diagnosis: A preliminary review. Soc Health Ill. 2009; 31(2): 278–299.
25.
Bosk ChL. Avoiding conventional understanding: The enduring legacy of Eliot Freidson. Soc Health Ill. 2006; 28(5): 637–646.
26.
Freidson E. The development of design by accident, in: Elling RH, Sokołowska M (eds.). Medical sociologists at work. New Brunswick, New Jersey, Transaction Books, 1978.p. 115–133.
27.
Conrad P. Eliot Freidson’s revolution in medical sociology. Health 2007; 11(2): 141–144.
28.
Strauss AL, Glaser BG. Chronic illness and the quality of life. Saint Louis, The C.V. Mosby Company, 1975.
29.
Freidson E. Profession of medicine. A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York–Hagerstown–San Francisco-London, Harper and Row Publishers 1970.p. 205–206.
30.
Conrad P. Where is the sociology of health and illness? Qualit Sociol. 1980; 3(2): 156.
31.
Gerhardt U. Ideas about illness. An intellectual and political history of medical sociology. New York, NY University Press, 1989.pp.76–78, 82, 89, 97, 127.
32.
Gabe J, Bury M, Elston MA (eds). Key concepts in medical sociology. London, Sage, 2006.p.130–131.
33.
Freidson E. Patient’s views of medical practice. A study of subscribers to a prepaid medical plan in the Bronx, Chicago–London, The University of Chicago Press, 1980.p.146–147.
34.
Strauss AL, Corbin J, Fagerhaugh S, Glaser BG, Maines D, Suczek B, Wiener CL. Chronic illness and the quality of life. Sec. Ed. St. Louis (Toronto), The C.V. Mosty Company, 1984.
35.
Corbin JM, Strauss A. Unending work and care. Managing chronic illness at home. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1988.p.9.
36.
Charmaz K. Struggling for a self: Identity levels of the chronically ill. In: Roth JA, Conrad P (eds.) Research in the sociology of health care. A research annual. The experience and management of chronic illness. Greenwich–London, JAI Press, 1987.p.283–321.
37.
Corbin JM, Strauss AL. The articulation of work through interaction. Soc Quarterly. 1993; 34(1): 71–83.
38.
Stewart DC, Sullivan TJ. Illness behavior and the sick role in chronic disease: The case of multiple sclerosis. In: Schwartz HD (ed.). Dominant issues in medical sociology. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1994.p.16–27.
39.
Goffman E. Piętno. Rozważania o zranionej tożsamości Gdańsk, GWP, 2005 (in Polish).
40.
Scambler G. Health–related stigma. Soc Health Ill. 2009; 31(3): 441–455.
42.
Bury M. Meanings at risk: The experience of arthritis. In: Anderson R, Bury M (eds.). Living with chronic illness. The experience of patients and their families. London, Unwin Hyman, 1988.p.89–116.
43.
Bury M. The sociology of chronic illness: A review of research and prospects. Soc Health Ill. 1991; 13(4): 451–467.
44.
Kleinman A. The illness narratives. Suffering, healing, and the human condition. New York, Basic Books, 1988.p.26.
45.
Ostrowska A. Niepełnosprawność, rehabilitacja i integracja społeczna osób niepełnosprawnych. In: Ostrowska A (ed.). Socjologia medycyny. Podejmowane problemy, kategorie analizy. Warszawa, Wyd. IFiS PAN, 2009.p. 145–171 (in Polish).
46.
Roth JA. Timetables. Structuring the passage of time in hospital treatment and other careers. Indianapolis–New York, The Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.
47.
Skrzypek M. Perspektywa chorego w socjologii choroby przewlekłej. Ujęcia teoretyczne, ich ewolucja i recepcja. Lublin, Wyd. KUL, 2011 (in Polish).
48.
Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption, Soc Health Ill. 1982; 4(2): 167–182.
49.
Faircloth CA, Boylstein C, Rittman M, Young ME, Gubrium J. Sudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Soc Health Ill. 2004; 26 (2): 242–261.
50.
Williams SJ. Chronic illness as biographical disruption or biographical disruption as chronic illness? Reflections on a core concept. Soc Health Ill. 2000; 22(1): 40–67.
51.
Bury M. On chronic illness and disability. In: Bird CE, Conrad P, Fremont AM (eds.). Handbook of medical sociology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (New Jersey), 2000.p.173.
52.
Latoszek M. Socjologia medycyny. Zagadnienia programowe Gdańsk, Wyd. AM w Gdańsku, 1979.p.10–11 (in Polish).
53.
Petersen S, Heesacker M, Schwartz RC. Physical illness: social construction or biological imperative? J Comm Health Nursing. 2001; 18(4): 213–222.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
