Regional differences in access to health care in Poland from the perspective of health care resources
More details
Hide details
Clinic of Paediatric Neurology, Faculty of Paediatrics, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Planning, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland
Statistical Office in Lublin, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018;25(1):77–81
To examine disparities in access to the public in Poland, in association of the resources of health care, socio-economic development of Provinces and their level of urbanization.

Material and Methods:
The Provinces were divided into four groups, using the quartile method, according to the urbanization and level of socio-economic development. The socio-economic development level was identified by the Human Development Index (HDI) for each Province. The urbanization level of each Province was determined by the Index of Urbanization (URBI). Disparities level to access to public health care was identified by taxonomic measure of accessibility (TMA), calculated using resources of health care data. TMA index was compared in the different regions, depending on the level of HDI and URBI.

There was no linear relationship between accessibility to public healthcare and socio-economic development of each tested region, nor between accessibility to public health care in the Provinces and their urbanization level. During the study, the correlation between the TMA and HDI and URBI alsdo produced a negative result.

An insufficient number of physicians and the limited value of contracts within the public health service may cause a drop in the availability of the public medical service sector, regardless of regional level of urbanization and socio-economic development.

Tadeusz Zienkiewicz   
Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Planning, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland
1. Act of 27 August 2004 on health care services financed from public funds [in Polish]. Dziennik Ustaw. 2008.
2. UNDP. Human Development Report. Concept and Measurement of Human Development. 1990.
3. Grabiński T, Wydymus S, Zeliaś A. Metody taksonomii numerycznej w modelowaniu zjawisk społeczno-gospodarczych. Warszawa: PWN; 1989.
4. Ministerstwo Zdrowia. Centrum Systemów Informacyjnych Ochrony Zdrowia. Biuletyn Statystyczny. Warszawa; 2011.
5. Rejestr Podmiotów Wykonijących Działalność Leczniczą. [Online]. [cited 2012 10 11].
6. Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia. Oddziały NFZ. [Online]. [cited 2012 10 11].
7. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Rocznik Statystyczny 2011. Warszawa; 2012.
8. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Studia i Analizy Statystyczne. Obszary Wiejskie w Polsce. Warszawa, Olsztyn; 2011.
9. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Bank Danych Lokalnych. Układ wg rejestru TERYT. [Online]. [cited 2012 10 11.
10. Murdoch A. Emigracja lekarzy z Polski Warszawa: SGH; 2011.
11. Norcini JJ, Mazmanian PE. Physician migration, education, and health care. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2005. p. 4–7.
12. Marchal B, Kegels G. Health workforce imbalances in times of globalization: brain drain or professional mobility? Int J Health Plann Manage. 2003 Oct-Dec. p. 89–101.
13. Gontarek R. Rynek [Online]. 2012 [cited 2012 12 27. Available from:, 117536,1.html.
14. Kobayashi Y, Takaki H. Geographic distribution of physicians in Japan. Lancet. 1992. p. 1391–3.
15. Wilkinson D, Symon B. Inequitable distribution of general practitioners in Australia: estimating need through the Robin Hood Index. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000. p. 71–5.
16. Theodorakis PN MG. Inequalities in the distribution of rural primary care physicians in two remote neighboring prefectures of Greece and Albania. Rural Remote Health. 2005. p. 457.
17. Plotnikova E. Cross-border mobility of health professionals: Contesting patients’ right to health. Social Science & Medicine. p. 20–7.
18. Tjadens F, Weilandt C, Eckert J. Mobility of Health Professionals Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2013.
19. Kolcic I, Polasek O, Mihalj H, Gombac E, Kraljevic V, Kraljevic I. Research involvement, specialty choice, and emigration preferences of final year medical students in Croatia. Croat Med J. 2005. p. 88–95.
20. Bączek I. Szpitalny dług. Med Info. 2006. p. 35.
21. 2009 OHD. Health Policy: Public share of health expenditure OECD countries, 2007 and change since 1990. 2009.