RESEARCH PAPER
Postoperative pain combating and evaluation of patient’s satisfaction from analgesic treatment
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Healthcare, The Bronisław Markiewicz State School of Technology and Economics, Jarosław, Poland
2
Department of Clinical Endoscopy, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Anna Lewandowska
Czarnieckiego 16, 37-500 Jarosław, Poland
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(Special Issue 1):48–51
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Pain is an inherent element of human life and one of the most unpleasant and unwanted experiences, causing fear, anxiety, or even anger. Pain is one of the strongest and most annoying experiences with a clear subjective character indicating risk to an organism or personality, or expressing its damage. Despite the intense development of medicine and modern surgical methods, surgery is still dealing with the huge problem of pain and its proper control. Effective combating of postoperative pain is currently a priority of modern surgical treatment, since it not only minimizes the patient’s suffering, but also improves the quality of his/her life, decreases the number of complications, shortens the hospital stay, and at the same time decreases the costs of treatment. Objective. The purpose of the presented study is analysis of the frequency of occurrence, intensity of postoperative pain and evaluation of patients’ satisfaction with analgesic treatment. Material and methods. The research included 100 patients from the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, 54% of women and 46% of men, 38% of whom were urban inhabitants and 62% rural inhabitants of the Podkarpackie voivodeship in south-east Poland. The research method used in was a diagnostic survey, analysis of documentation and pain measurement with numerical and visual analogue scales. Results. Pain occurred from 12 – 24 hours before the procedure in the case of 20% of the patients, whereas 48% of the respondents complained about pain more than 1 day before the procedure. Pain before the procedure was a partial difficulty in self-care and physical activity for 26% of the subjects. The biggest amount of patients (30%) were afraid of postoperative complications. In the first day after the procedure, as much as 84% of the respondents complained about pain, on the second day the pain was felt by 74% of the patients, and on the third day by 57% of the respondents. Pain intensity, which was moderate in accordance with the VAS scale, was signalized by 35% of patients, strong pain was reported by 60% of the patients, and 5% of men evaluated the pain as very strong. Conclusions. Postoperative pain was only a partial difficulty for the majority of patients, administration of a painkiller brought relief to the majority of patients, who had been afraid of the surgical procedure because of postoperative complications, not postoperative pain.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Brill S, Gurmann GM, Fisher A. A history of neuraxial administration of local analgesis and opioids. Eur J Anaesthesial. 2003; 20: 682–689.
 
2.
Bogusz J. Encyclopaedia for nurses. PZWL, Warszawa 1991.
 
3.
Kocur J. Art of treatment. 2003; 9(3–4): 59.
 
4.
Zając P, Szpakowski R. Nurse’s role in combating postoperative pain. Biuletyn Informacyjny- Podkarpacka Okręgowa Izba Pielęgniarek i Położnych z/s w Przeworsku 2010; (7–8): 15.
 
5.
Czaplińska M. Pain – a disease itself. Magazyn Pielęgniarki i Położnej 2010; (1–2): 33.
 
6.
Koszewski W. Pain treatment in various diseases. Termedia Wydawnictwa Medyczne, Poznań 2009.p. 5.
 
7.
Formański J. Psychology. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa 2003.p.198.
 
8.
Koszewski W. Pain treatment in various diseases. Termedia Wydawnictwa Medyczne, Poznań 2009.p.5.
 
9.
Wordliczek J, Dobrogowski J. Postoperative pain treatment. Training set for nurses.p.3.
 
10.
Gaszyński W, Żaryski W, Gaszyński T. Current methods of pharmacological treatment of postoperative pain. Ordynator Leków 2005; (11–12): 49–50.
 
11.
Przewoźnik E, Kapała W. Pain dictionary, meaning the most often used pain definitions after various surgical procedures. Pielęg. Pol 2007; 1(23): 20–24.
 
12.
Watson MS, Lukas CF, Hoy AM, Back JN. Palliative care. Urban & Partner, Wrocław 2005.p.177–179.
 
13.
Dobrogowski J, Mayzner-Zawadzka E, Drobnik L et al. Postoperative pain relieving – recommendations 2008. Ból 2008; 9.
 
14.
Wołowicka L. Anaesthesiology and intense care – Clinic and nursing. Warszawa 2007.p. 289–296.
 
15.
Dobrogowski J, Wordliczek J, Przeklasa-Muszyńska A. Pharmacotherapy of postoperative pain. Przegl Lek. 2000; 57: 215–220.
 
16.
Kapała W. Nursing in surgery. Czelej, Lublin 2006.p.41.
 
17.
De Loach JE. Nursing in general surgery. PZWL, Warszawa 1984.
 
18.
Bowden J. Postoperative pain relief. Pain relief in Current Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996; 6: 74- 79. Idvall E. Nursing documentation of postoperative pain management. J Clin Nurs. 2002; 1: 734–742.
 
19.
Idvall E. Nursing documentation of postoperative pain management. J Clin Nurs. 2002; 1: 734–743.
 
20.
Zadroga M, Dyk D. Postoperative pain as current problem in patient’s nursing. IV Zjazd Pielęgniarstwo w anestezjologii i intensywnej opiece – wymogi i oczekiwania a realia. Poznań 2005.
 
21.
Kołodziej W, Karpel E. Postoperative pain on surgical department according to the survey research with use of McGill-Melzack questionnaire – initial report. Probl Pielęg. 2008; 16(3): 232, 235.
 
22.
Misiołek H, Budziński D. Postoperative pain – pathophysiology and methods of treatment with consideration of urological procedures. Przegląd Urologiczny 2002; 3: 48–52.
 
23.
Rawe IM, Lowenstein A, Barcelo CR, Genecov DG. Control of Postoperative Pain with a Wearable Continuously Operating Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy Device: A Preliminary Study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2011.
 
24.
Buvanendran A, Kroin JS, Della Valle CJ, Kari M, Moric M, Tuman KJ. Perioperative oral pregabalin reduces chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2010; 110: 199–207.
 
25.
Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011; 12: 725–74.
 
26.
Frykberg R, Martin E, Tallis A, Tierney E. A case history of multimodal therapy in healing a complicated diabetic foot wound: negative pressure, dermal replacement, and pulsed radiofrequency energy therapies. Int Wound J. 2011; 8: 132–139.
 
27.
Frykberg RG, Driver VR, Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Isenberg RA. The use of pulsed radiofrequency energy therapy in treating lower extremity wounds: results of a retrospective study of a wound registry. Ostomy Wound Manage 2011; 57: 22–29.
 
28.
Rohde C, Chiang A, Adipoju O, Casper D, Pilla AA. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on IL-1 beta and post-operative pain: a doubleblind, placebo-controlled pilot study in breast reduction patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125: 1620–1629.
 
29.
Li Q, Kao H, Matros E, Peng C, Murphy GF, Guo L. Pulsed radiofrequency energy (PRFE) accelerates wound healing in diabetic mice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 2255–2262.
 
30.
Moffett J, Griffin N, Ritz M, George F. Pulsed radiofre-quency energy field treatment of cells in culture results in increased expression of genes involved in the inflammation phase of lower extremity diabetic wound healing. J Diabet Foot Com-plicat. 2010; 2: 57–64.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966