RESEARCH PAPER
Occupational illnesses related to physical strains in apple harvesting
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Agraria, University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, Italy
2
University of Natural Resources and Life Science, Division of Agricultural Engineering, Vienna, Austria
3
Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Applied Science, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
4
Department of Sports and Physiological Performance, Centre of Sports Science, University of Vienna, Austria
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Paola Callea   

Department of Agraria, University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, Italy
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(2):407–411
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Special strains are an occupational hazard often due to physical loads and inadequately designed work equipment.

Oective:
The aim of this pilot study was to determine occupational illnesses related to physical strains through an experimental design that assesses the associated working postures and oxygen uptake in apple harvesting.Three methods were applied to define the physical stress provoked by apple farming tasks.

Material and Methods:
The experiments considered 5 labourers – 3 women and 2 men. The physical fatigue was assessed through oxygen consumption and heartbeat frequency according to UNI EN ISO 8996 standards. Measurements were conducted using a portable metabolimeter(COSMED). Working postures were determined according to Ovako Working Posture Analysis System(OWAS). An interview was conducted to record the labourers’ subjective estimate of the stress.

Results:
The interview results demonstrated neck and dorsal pains and fatigue causes for each operator. The V̇O2 was equal to 82.33±27.40 lO2/h for women and 67.00±27.60 lO2/h for men, meaning that it was tiring for some men but for all women. The heart rates were of 115±6.00bpm for women and 113±5.65bpm for men. The V̇CO2 was of 63.81±21.45 lCO2/h for women and 45.10±25.53 lCO2/h for men, while energetic equivalent and body surface area were similar for both genders, about 5.60W×h/l O2 and 1,80m2 on average. Women’s metabolic rate had a very high value – over 290W×m-2, although for the men it was between 200–260W×m-2. According to OWAS, low apple picking was ranked in class 2, high apple picking in class 1, and apple transportation belonged to class 3.

 
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Vohlonen I, Husman K, Kalimo E, Nuutinen J, Tupi K, Virolainen R. A study based on an Experiment in 1979–1983. Occupational Health Services for farmers 1985; 21: 1–272.
 
2.
Ahonen E, Venäläinen JM, Könönen U, Klenk T. The physical strain of dairy farming. Ergonomics 1990; 33(12): 1549–1555.
 
3.
Sichert I, Heitkämper K, Schick M. Arbeitswirtschaftliche Kennzahlen zur Tafelapfelproduktion. Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon 2006; 663: 9–10.
 
4.
Gilad I. A methodology for functional ergonomics in repetitive work. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1995; 15: 91–101.
 
5.
Lomond KV, Cotè JN. Differences in posture-movement changes induced by repetitive arm motion in healthy and shoulder-injured individuals. Clinical Biomechanics 2011; 26: 123–129.
 
6.
Madeleine P, Lundager B, Voigt M, Arendt-Nielsen L. Shoulder muscle coordination during chronic and acute experimental neck-shoulder pain. An occupational pain study. European Journal of Applied Physiology & Occupational Physiology 1999; 79:127.
 
7.
Barton PM, Hayes KC. Neck flexor muscle strength, efficiency, and relaxation times in normal subjects and subjects with unilateral neck pain and headache. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996; 77(7): 680–687.
 
8.
Pearson I, Reichert A, De Serres S, Dumas JP, Cotè JN. Maximal voluntary isometric neck strength deficits in adults with whiplash associated disorders and associated pain and fear of movement. The journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2009; 39: 179–187.
 
9.
Tuure MV. Determination of physical stress in agricultural work, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1992; 10: 275–284.
 
10.
Rodahl K. On the assessment of physical work stress. Proceedings of the 1th International Symposium held 1978; 2(4):199–216.
 
11.
Van Dieen JH. Ergoloc, a method to establish loads on the locomotor system at work. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 237: XI Workshop on Labour and Labour Management, 1989; 237: 113–122.
 
12.
Parr BB, Strath SJ, Bassett Jr, Howley ET. Validation of the Cosmed K4b2 portable metabolic measurement system. Medicine & Scince in Sport & Exercise. 2001; 33: 300.
 
13.
Calisto C. Ergonomic investigation in fruit growing. Musculoskeletal disorders and their risk factor. Verlag Grauer, Stuttgart, Germany, 1999.p.86–117.
 
14.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Ergonomics of the thermal environment-determination of metabolic rate (Standard No. ISO 8996:2004). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2004.
 
15.
Cody RP, Smith JK. Applied statistics and the SAS programming language 5th ed. Prentice Hall 2006.p.208–209.
 
16.
Rohmert W, Luczak H. Zur ergonomischen Beurteilung informatorischer Arbeit, Internationale Zeitschrift für Angewandte Physiologie 1973; 31: 209–229.
 
17.
Ulmer HV. Arbeitsphysiologie. In: Schmidt RF, Thews G. Physiologie des Menschen, 24. Aufl. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo Springer Verlag, 1990.
 
18.
Lehmann G. Handbuch der gesamten Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsablauf und Arbeitsrhythmus. George Thieme Verlag Stuttgart New York, 1961; 166–171.
 
19.
Jenik P. Biomechanische Analyse ausgewählter Arbeitsbewegungen des Armes, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, Köln, Frankfurt, 1973.
 
20.
Richardson GE, Jenkins P, Fulmer S, Mason C, Burdick P, May J. An ergonomic intervention to reduce back strain among apple harvest workers in New York State. Applied Ergonomics 2005; 36: 327–334.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966