RESEARCH PAPER
Lifestyle of the elderly living in rural and urban areas measured by the FANTASTIC Life Inventory
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Family Medicine and Community Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
 
2
Department of Management in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
 
3
Department of Development in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
 
4
Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Sociology, John Paul II Catholic University, Lublin, Poland
 
5
Department of Informatics and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Beata Dobrowolska   

Department of Development in Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, Poland, Staszica Str. 4-6, 20-081 Lublin, Poland
 
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018;25(3):562-567
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
A healthy lifestyle can help older people maintain their functional ability and, therefore, satisfaction with life. An important aspect of health promotion is the assessment of lifestyle factors over which patients have some control.

Objective:
The aim of this study was to analyze the lifestyle of the elderly in urban and rural areas using the Fantastic Life Inventory (FLI).

Material and methods:
The research group comprised 138 people aged 65–94 years (M = 72.41, SD = 6.90). Participants were recruited from urban 78 (56.5%) and rural 60 (43.5%) areas. The FLI used in this study has 25 closed-ended questions that explore nine domains, including physical, psychological, and social lifestyle components.

Results:
The overall lifestyle of most seniors was ‘excellent’ (45.7%) or ‘very good’ (41.3%); none of the respondents scored in the lowest category – ‘needs improvement’. The domains that mostly demonstrated the need for a change were related to activity, nutrition, insight, sleep, stress. Participants from rural areas tended to have lower scores in the activity (p= 0.017) and nutrition (p= 0.015) domains. The lifestyle of the elderly is determined by several factors, including age, gender, health status, level of education, and the place of residence.

Conclusions:
The majority of older persons demonstrated an ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’ lifestyle with healthy habits. The adoption of healthy lifestyle patterns, in particular a regular balanced diet and proper physical activity, can help prevent functional limitations among the elderly in rural areas.

 
REFERENCES (37)
1.
Sytuacja demograficzna osób starszych i konsekwencje starzenia się ludności Polski w świetle prognozy na lata 2014-2050 (The demographic situation of the elderly and the consequences of ageing in the population of Poland in the light of the forecast for the years 2014-2050), Warszawa, 2014, p. 3. http://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tem..., (accessed on 24.07.2017).
 
2.
Muszalik M, Zielińska-Więczkowska H, Kędziora-Kornatowska K, Kornatowski T. Ocena wybranych zachowań sprzyjających zdrowiu wśród osób starszych w oparciu o Inwentarz Zachowań Zdrowotnych Juczyńskiego w aspekcie czynników socjo-demograficznych (The assessment of selected health-promoting behaviors among the elderly, based on Juczyński’s Inventory of Health Behaviors and accounting for socio-demographic factors). Probl Hig Epidemiol. 2013; 94(3): 509-513.
 
3.
Milio N. Health through public policy. Public Health Association. Ottawa Canada 1986.
 
4.
Cockerham W.C. Medical sociology. Englewood Cliffs. N. J. Prentice Hall, 1995.
 
5.
Abel T. Measuring health lifestyles in a comparative analysis. Theoretical issues and empirical findings. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32(8): 899-908.
 
6.
Jabłoński L, Wysokińska-Miszczuk J. Podstawy gerontologii i wybrane zagadnienia z geriatrii (Rudiments of gerontology and selected issues in geriatrics). Czelej, Lublin 2006.
 
7.
Blaxter M. Health and lifestyles. Edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
 
8.
Kickbusch I. Lifestyles and health. Soc Sci Med. 1986; 22(2): 117-124.
 
9.
Wardle J, Steptoe A. The European health and Behaviour Survey: rationale, methods and initial results from the United Kingdom. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 33(8): 925-36.
 
10.
Woynarowska B. Edukacja zdrowotna (Health education). PWN, Warszawa 2007.
 
11.
American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity. Patient-Centered Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Stepwise Approach from the American Geriatrics Society. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2012; 60: 1957–1968.
 
12.
Biernacka B, Pieniążek M, Pyć M, Dziewulska J. Ocena zachowań zdrowotnych i analiza zdrowia jako wartości w ocenie studentów Uniwersytetu Trzeciego Wieku Marii Curie Skłodowskiej w Lublinie (An assessment of health behaviors and the analysis of health as a value, as seen by the students of the University of the Third Age at the Maria Curie Sklodowska University in Lublin). Zdrowie i Dobrostan. 2015; 2: 27–38.
 
13.
Selivanova A, Cramm JM. The relationship between healthy behaviours and health outcomes among older adults in Russia. BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 1183. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1183.
 
14.
Cybulski M, Krajewska-Kulak E, Jamiolkowski J. Preferred health behaviors and quality of life of the elderly people in Poland. Clin Interv Aging. 2015; 10: 1555-1564.
 
15.
He Z, Cheng Z, Shao T, Liu Ch, Shao P, Bishwajit G, Feng D, Feng Z. Factors influencing health knowledge and behaviors among the elderly in rural China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016; 13: 975. doi:10.3390/ijerph13100975.
 
16.
Juczyński Z. Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia (Tools for health promotion and psychology of health). 2nd edition. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych, Warszawa 2009, p. 110-116.
 
17.
Wilson DMC, Ciliska D. Lifestyle assessment: Development and use of the FANTASTIC checklist. Canadian Family Physician 1984; 30: 1527–1532.
 
18.
Campos Tassini C, Ribeiro do Val G, da Silva Candido S, Kallás Bachur C. Assessment of the Lifestyle of University Students in the Healthcare Area Using the Fantastic Questionnaire. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2017; 30(2): 117-122.
 
19.
Marques Silva AM, da Silva Brito I, da Costa Amado JM. Tradução, adaptação e validação do questionário Fantastic Lifestyle Assessment em estudantes do ensino superior. Cien Saude Colet. 2014; 19(6): 1901-1909.
 
20.
Ramírez-Vélez R, Triana-Reina HR, Carrillo HA, Ramos-Sepúlveda JA, Rubio F, Poches-Franco L, Rincón-Párraga D, Meneses-Echávez J, Correa-Bautista JE. A cross-sectional study of Columbian University students’ self-perceived lifestyle. SpringerPlus. 2015; 4:289.
 
21.
http://www.mocatest.org/pdf_fi... (accessed on 29.10.2017.).
 
22.
Zanjani S, Tol A, Mohebbi B, Sadeghi R, Keramat Nouri Jalyani KN, Moradi A. Determinants of healthy lifestyle and its related factors among elderly people, J Educ Health Promot. 2015; 4: 103 – 115.
 
23.
Błędowski P. Gospodarstwa domowe i sytuacja mieszkaniowa ludzi starych (Households and the residential situation of the elderly), [in:] B. Synak (red.), Polska starość (Polish old age), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk, 2002, p.115–139.
 
24.
Nguyen AL, Seal DW. Cross-cultural comparison of successful ageing definitions between Chinese and Hmong elders in the United States. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2014; 29(2): 153-171. doi:10.1007/s10823-014-9231-z.
 
25.
Skrzek A, Ignasiak Z, Sławińska T, Domaradzki J, Fugiel J, Sebastjan A, Rożek K. Structural and functional markers of health depending on lifestyle in elderly women from Poland. Clin Interv Aging. 2015; 10: 781–793.
 
26.
Niezabitowski M. Sieci wsparcia i więzi społeczne ludzi starszych (Support networks and social bonds of the elderly). Stan teorii i badań socjologicznych a potrzeby praktyki (State of the art of the theory and sociological research vs. practical needs), [in:] J. Grotowska-Leder (ed.), Sieci wsparcia społecznego jako przejaw integracji i dezintegracji społecznej (Social support networks as a manifestation of social integration and disintegration), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź; 2008, p. 144–170.
 
27.
Wojszel ZB. Nieformalna sieć wsparcia osób starszych w środowisku na przykładzie wyników badań wybranych środowisk województwa podlaskiego (An informal support network for the elderly in their immediate environment as illustrated by the results of research into the selected environments of the Podlaskie Voivodeship), [in:] D. Rancew-Sikora, C. Obracht-Prondzyński, M. Kaczmarczyk i Piotr Czekanowski (ed.), O społecznym znaczeniu tożsamości, miejsca i czasu życia (On the social significance of the identity, place and time of life). Szkice socjologiczne i gerontologiczne. Księga dedykowana prof. Brunonowi Synakowi (Sketches on sociology and gerontology. A volume dedicated to Prof. Brunon Synak), Zrzeszenie Kaszubsko-Pomorskie, Gdańsk; 2013, p. 369–380.
 
28.
Adamiak P. Zaangażowanie społeczne Polek i Polaków. Wolontariat, Filantropia, 1% i wizerunek organizacji samorządowych. Raport z badania 2013 (The social involvement of Poles. Voluntary work, philanthropy, the “1 percent”, and the image of NGOs. Report on the 2013 survey), Stowarzyszenie KLON/JAWOR, Warszawa 2014, p. 47-49.
 
29.
Campbell KL, Ash S, Bauer JD. The impact of nutrition intervention on quality of life in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Clin Nutr. 2008; 27: 537–44.
 
30.
Willcox DC, Scapagnini G, Willcox BJ. Healthy aging diets other than the Mediterranean: A focus on the Okinawan diet. Mech Ageing Dev. 2014; 136: 148–62.
 
31.
Prakash SJ, Bihari GS, Kumar SA. Lifestyle habits and diseases amongst rural geriatrics population. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016 Apr 3(4): 957-961.
 
32.
Tavares DMS. Bolina AF, Dias FA, Ferreira PCS, Haas VJ. Quality of life of the elderly. Comparison between urban and rural areas. Invest Educ Enferm. 2014; 32(3): 401-413.
 
33.
Ford J, Spallek M, Dobson A. Self-rated health and a healthy lifestyle are the most important predictors of survival in elderly women. Age Ageing. 2008; 37:194–200.
 
34.
de Groot LC, Verheijden MW, de Henauw S, Schroll M, van Staveren WA. Lifestyle, nutritional status, health, and mortality in elderly people across Europe: a review of the longitudinal results of the SENECA study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004; 59(12): 1277-84.
 
35.
Södergren M, Wang WC, Salmon J, Ball K, Crawford D, McNaughton SA. Predicting healthy lifestyle patterns among retirement age older adults in the WELL study: A latent class analysis of sex differences. Maturitas. 2014; 77: 41–6.
 
36.
Roskam AJ, Kunst AE. The predictive value of different socio-economic indicators for overweight in nine European countries. Public Health Nutr. 2008; 11: 1256–66.
 
37.
Babak A, Davari S, Aghdak P, Pirhaji O. Assessment of healthy lifestyle among elderly in Isfahan. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2011; 29: 1074–64.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top