CASE REPORT
Influence of a vertical deviation of a 10-storey apartment building in Katowice, Poland, on selected mental functions of its occupants. A preliminary study
 
More details
Hide details
1
Medical University of Silesia, School of Public Health, Bytom, Poland
2
Silesian University of Technology, Department of Air Protection, Gliwice, Poland
3
University of Southern Denmark, Unit for Health Promotion Research, Esbjerg, Denmark
4
Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, Sosnowiec, Poland
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(1):178–182
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objectives: Coal exploitation technology could have affected the deformation of ground under a housing estate in the Upper Silesia agglomeration. The 10-storey apartment building began to deviate from the vertical. These factors affected the housing conditions of inhabitants in the block of flats. From 1991-2001, coal-mine surveyors monitored the vertical deviation. The inhabitants of the apartment building decided to put in a claim to their housing association which subsequently requested that the coal mine authorities repair the damages. The coal mine authorities initially refused to acknowledge inhabitants claim. Materials and Methods: An interdisciplinary group of experts were engaged who examined the group of inhabitants. Generally accepted and evidence based psychological methods were selected and certified, and psychological equipment was used. Results: Preliminary deductions showed a strict connection between psychical discomfort, negative stress and vertical deviation. Based on the experts’ report, the housing association decided to sue the coal mine authorities who offered to settle the inhabitants’ grievances out of court and to straighten the apartment building – an influenced decision. Conclusions: This report is one of the best documented examples of a health impact assessment conducted in the 1990, a long time before the legal and methodological basis of Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) began to be implemented in other European countries.
 
REFERENCES (33)
1.
European Center for Health Policy, Brussels, 1999. Health Impact Assessment, Main concepts and suggested approach, Gothenburg consensus paper, December, 1999. http://www.apho.org.uk/resourc... item.aspx?RID=44163 (access: 2012.04.21).
 
2.
Kwiatek J. Ocena możliwości eksploatacji pokładu 501, 510, 620 w rejonie osiedla im. W. Witosa w Katowicach. Główny Instytut Górnictwa, Katowice, 1991.
 
3.
Zawora J. Wychylenie od pionu budynku mieszkalnego przy ulicy Ossowskiego 28/28a na osiedlu Witosa w Katowicach. Główny Instytut Górnictwa, Katowice, 1995.
 
4.
Bilikiewicz A. Psychiatria, PZWL, Warszawa 2007.
 
5.
Jakubowska-Winecka A, Włodarczyk D. Psychologia w praktyce medycznej. Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL, Warszawa 2007.
 
6.
Stanik JM. (Ed.) Wybrane techniki diagnostyczne w psychologii klinicznej. Uniwersytet Śląski, Katowice 1980.
 
7.
Stanik JM. Zastosowanie wybranych technik diagnostycznych w psychologicznej praktyce klinicznej i sądowej. Uniwersytet Śląski, Katowice 2006.
 
8.
Eysenck HJ. Handbook of abnormal psychology. Basic Books, New York 1961.
 
9.
Brzozowski P, Drwał RŁ. Kwestionariusz osobowościowy Eysencka. Polska adaptacja EPQ-R. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP, Warszawa 1995.
 
10.
Taylor LE. Testy i pomiary w psychologii. PWN, Warszawa, 1967.
 
11.
Cattell RB. Personality and motivation structure and measurement. World Book. New York 1957.
 
12.
Chlewiński Z. Elementy Cattellowskiej teorii osobowości. Roczniki Filozoficzne 1964; 12(4).
 
13.
Obuchowski K. Kody orientacji i struktura procesów emocjonalnych. PWN, Warszawa 1982.
 
14.
Reykowski J. Eksperymentalna psychologia emocji. KiW, Warszawa 1974.
 
15.
Łosiak W. Psychologia emocji, Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne. Warszawa 2007.
 
16.
Vanclay F, Bronstein D. Editors’ Preface: The state of the art of Impact Assessment. In: Vanclay F, Bronstein D. (Eds). Environmental and Social Impact Assessment. Wiley: Chichester; 1995: pp.xi–xiii.
 
17.
Taleyko E. Od czego zależy samopoczucie pracownika i jego psychiczna zdolność do pracy. CRZZ, Warszawa, 1977.
 
18.
Tomaszewski T. (ed.) Psychologia. PWN, Warszawa, 1982.
 
19.
Wasmer Smith L. Psychika i ciało. S.A.F. Warszawa, 1998. 20. Kępiński A. Psychopatologia nerwic. Wyd. literackie, 2007.
 
20.
Strelau J, Doliński D. Psychologia Akademicka. Vol. 1, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk 2010.
 
21.
Zeigarnik BW. Podstawy patopsychologii klinicznej. PWN, 1983.
 
22.
Hornowski B. Psychologia różnic indywidualnych. WSiP, Warszawa, 1985.
 
23.
Strelau J. Psychologia różnic indywidualnych. Wyd. 2. rozszerzone. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. Warszawa 2006.
 
24.
Domachowski W. Przewodnik po psychologii społecznej. PWN, Warszawa 1998.
 
25.
Vanclay F. Impact assessment and the triple bottom line: Competing pathways to sustainability? 2004.
 
26.
Vanclay FM. Impact Assessment and the Triple Bottom Line: Competing pathways to sustainability? Sustainability and Social Science Round Table Proceedings; 12 Dec 2003; Sydney, Australia; 2004. 28. Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Washington, 1970.
 
27.
The Council of the European Economic Community. Directive 85/337/ EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment.
 
28.
The Council of the European Union. Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. http://ec.europa. eu/environment/eia/full-legal-text/9711.htm (access: 2012.04.21).
 
29.
Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J. The Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment, Scope and limitations of supporting decisionmaking in Europe. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, The Cromwell Press, Trowbridge, Wilts; 2007: p. 3-32.
 
30.
World Health Organization. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. http://www.searo.who.int/LinkF... SDH_SDH_FinalReport.pdf (access: 2012.04.21).
 
31.
Parry J, Wright J. Community participation in health impact assessments: intuitively appealing but practically difficult. World Health Organization Bulletin 2003; 81(6): p. 388.
 
32.
International Association for Impact Assessment. Impact Assessment. http://www.iaia.org/publicdocu... is%20IA_web.pdf (access: 2012.04.21).
 
33.
Harvey N. Environmental Impact Assessment: procedures, practice and prospects in Australia. Oxford University Pres, Melbourne, 1998.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966