0.829
IF
20
MNiSW
166.26
ICV
RESEARCH PAPER
 
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
 
 

Withdrawal from bariatric treatment – an analysis under various demographic conditions

Jacek Szeliga 1  ,  
Kinga Kupczyk 1,  
 
1
Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
2
Department of Balneology and Physical Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med 2016;23(4):688–691
KEYWORDS:
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
Poland is high on a list of countries affected by epidemics of obesity, a problem that has especially suddenly increased in the post-transformation period.

Material and Methods:
Documentation of 115 subsequent patients diagnosed with grade 3 obesity, considered eligible for surgical treatment, was analysed since 2015. A subgroup of 68 patients was selected from this group and the included patients who decided to cancel their treatment at various stages. Their history since presentation at the obesity treatment centre, BMI with its history, age, education and place of residence were analysed, followed by a telephone survey. 42 patients were finally contacted. Special attention was placed on the analysis of patients taking into account their place of residence. Patients were divided into inhabitants of rural and urban areas.

Results:
In the study group of 68 patients, 19 (27.9%) were inhabitants of rural areas and 49 (72.1%) of urban areas. Women accounted for 67.6%, and men for 32.4%. The mean age of patients when they presented for treatment was 43 years. On average, men presented 5 years later compared to women. The mean BMI on qualification for treatment of obesity was 47.6 kg/m2. The mean BMI max – 49.6 kg/m2. There were no differences regarding education in both populations. Despite the lack of differences regarding changes in the BMI since withdrawal from treatment, as many as 63% of patients from rural areas reached the BMI max in this time.

Conclusions:
There were demographic differences between the degree of obesity observed among patients receiving bariatric treatment, and inhabitants of urban areas were favoured. Patients from rural areas who withdrew from bariatric treatment and were left without medical care significantly more often achieved their maximum body weight, when compared to those living in urban areas. The active participation of physicians, both specialists and general practitioners, in the life of obese patients is imperative.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Jacek Szeliga   
Department of General, Gastroenterological and Oncological Surgery, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
 
REFERENCES (14):
1. Jastrzębska-Mierzyńska M, Ostrowska L, Hady HR, Dadan J, Konarzewska-Duchnowska E. The impact of bariatric surgery on nutritional status of patients. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015 Apr; 10(1): 115–24.
2. Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, Singh GM, Gutierrez HR, Lu Y, Bahalim AN, Farzadfar F, Riley LM, Ezzati M, Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Body Mass Index). National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 country-years and 9·1 million participants Lancet. 2011 12; 377(9765): 557–67.
3. 2013 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Overweight and obesity 2012,”.http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/causes/index.html.
  WWW
4. Misra A, Khurana L Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in developing countries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 93(11 Suppl 1): S9–30.
5. Miech RA, Kumanyika SK, Stettler N, et al. Trends in the association of poverty with overweight among US adolescents, 1971– 2004. JAMA 2006; 295: 2385–2393.
6. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, et al. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index in US children and adolescents, 1999– 2010. JAMA 2012; 307: 483–490.
7. Davis AM, Bennett KJ, Befort C, et al. Obesity and related health behaviors among urban and rural children in the United States: Data from the national health and nutrition examination survey 2003–2004 and 2005–2006. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011; 36: 669–676.
8. Janik MR, Bielecka I, Kwiatkowski A, Janik PE, Drazba T, Bujok J, Stanowski E, Paśnik K. Cross-sectional study of male sexual function in bariatric patients. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016; 11(3): 171–177.
9. Rabiasz B, Jarosz M. Problem nadmiaru masy ciała wśród dzieci i młodzieży wiejskiej województwa podkarpackiego. Zdr Publ. 2010; 120(2): 136–138.
10. Wolnicka K, Jarosz M, Jaczewska-Schuetz J, Taraszewska AM. Differences in the prevalence of overweight, obesity and underweight among children from primary schools in rural and urban areas. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016; 23(2): 341–4.
11. Major P, Stefura T, Jezierska-Kazberuk M, Wysocki M, Pędziwiatr M, Pisarska M, Małczak P, Kacprzyk A, Budzyński A The knowledge of Polish primary care physicians about bariatric surgery Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016; 11(3): 164–170.
12. Woodruff RC, Schauer GL, Addison AR, Gehlot A, Kegler MC. Barriers to weight loss among community health center patients: qualitative insights from primary care providers. BMC Obes. 2016; 21;3: 43.
13. Kegler MC, Alcantara I, Veluswamy JK, Haardörfer R, Hotz JA, Glanz K. Results From an Intervention to Improve Rural Home Food and Physical Activity Environments. Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action”. 2012; 6(3): 265–277. doi:10.1353/cpr.2012.0042.
14. http://www.natpol.org.
  WWW
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966