RESEARCH PAPER
Sexual activity of Polish adults
 
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Psychology, University of Gdańsk, Poland
2
Faculty of Education, Uniwersity of Warsaw, Poland; The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, USA
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(1):194–197
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Aim:
The purpose of this research was to explore the subject of sexual activity in the Polish population, with special focus on age and gender differences, and sexual infidelity. Sexual activity is one of the basic factors in initiating and maintaining relationships. On the one hand, sexual activity enables us to meet natural needs and maintain an intimate relationship with another human being; on the other, it may allow us to overcome loneliness and social isolation by providing the opportunity to express feelings of closeness and unity.

Material and Methods:
The research was conducted on a representative group of 3,200 Poles aged between 15–49, with the support of a well-known Polish research company – TNS OBOP. Face-to-face and Pencil and Paper (PAPI) interviews were carried out.

Results:
The results focus on two main issues: the age and motives of sexual initiation among teenagers (with a significant percentage starting their sexual activity at the age of 15), and the quality of the sexual lives of adults (average number of sexual partners, sexual infidelity and sexual satisfaction).

Conclusions:
There is dependence between the type of relationship and the performance or non-performance of sexual activity, as well as the quality of the relationship. Among both adolescents and adults, remaining in a stable relationship (partnership or marriage) promotes loyalty. The performance of sexual goals turns out to be an important mechanism regulating the interpersonal aspects of a relationship, influencing their perception and evaluation.

 
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Baldwin JD, Baldwin JI. Gender differences in sexual interest. Arch Sex Behav. 1997; 26: 181–210.
 
2.
Bancroft J. Seksualność człowieka (Human sexuality and its problems). Wrocław, Elsevier Urban & Partner. 2011 (in Polish).
 
3.
Izdebski Z. Seksualność Polaków na początku XXI wieku. Studium badawcze. Kraków, Wydawnictwo UJ. 2012.
 
4.
Izdebski Z, Ostrowska A. Seks po polsku. Zachowania seksualne jako element stylu życia Polaków. Warszawa, Wydawnictwo MUZA. 2003 (in Polish).
 
5.
Każmierczak M. Oblicza empatii w relacjach małżeńskich. Gdańsk, Wydawnictwo UG. 2008 (in Polish).
 
6.
Santtila P, Wager K, Witting K, Harlaar N, Jern P, Johansson A, Varjonen M, Sandnabba NK. Discrepancies between Sexual Desire and Sexual Activity: Gender. 2008.
 
7.
Pastwa-Wojciechowska B. Wstrzemięźliwość seksualna – norma, patologia czy moda? In: Chybicka A, Pastwa-Wojciechowska B. (Eds). Kobiecość w obliczu zmian – studia interdyscyplinarne (33–60). Kraków, Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls. 2009 (in Polish).
 
8.
Mark PK, Janssen E, Milhausen RR. Infidelity in Heterosexual Couples: Demographic, Interpersonal, and Personality-Related Predictors of Extradyadic Sex. Arch Sex Behav. 2011; 40: 971–982.
 
9.
Beisert M. Rozwód. Proces radzenia sobie z kryzysem. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Fundacji Humaniora. 2000 (in Polish).
 
10.
Izdebski Z. Seksualność Polaków w dobie HIV/AIDS. Ryzykowna dekada. Studium porównawcze 1997–2001–2005, Zielona Góra: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogorskiego. 2006 (in Polish).
 
11.
Impett EA, Strachman A, Finkel EJ, Gable ShL. Maintaining Sexual Desire in Intimate Relationships: The Importance of Approach Goals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008; 94(5): 808–823.
 
12.
Levine S. Re-exploring the concept of sexual desire. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002; 28: 39–51.
 
13.
Levine S. The nature of sexual desire: A clinician’s perspective. Arch Sex Behav. 2003; 32: 279–285.
 
14.
Klusmann D. Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership. Arch Sex Behav. 2002; 31: 275–287.
 
15.
Pastwa-Wojciechowska B. Psychopathy and Gender Differences. From Norm to Pathology. In: Chybicka A, Każmierczak M. (Eds). Appreciating diversity – gender and cultural issues (381–414). Kraków, Oficyna Wydawnicza IMPULS. 2008.
 
16.
The World Health Report. Primary health care – now more than ever. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2008.
 
17.
Janicka I. Kohabitacja a małżeństwo w perspektywie psychologicznej, Lodz, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Lodzkiego. 2006 (in Polish).
 
18.
Cramer D. How a supportive partner may increase relationship satisfaction. British J Guid Counsell. 2006; 34: 117–131.
 
19.
Błachnio A, Buliński L. Prejudices and elderly patients’ personality – the problem of quality of care and quality of life in geriatric medicine. Med Sci Mon. 2013; 19: 674–680.
 
20.
Tomaszewski W, Mańko G, Ziółkowski A, Pąchalska M. An evaluation of the health-related quality of life of patients aroused from prolonged coma when treated by physiotherapists with or without training in the “Academy of Life” program. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013; 20(2): 319–323.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966