RESEARCH PAPER
Plant pollen content in the air of Lublin (central-eastern Poland) and risk of pollen allergy
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of General Ecology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Botany, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(4):693–696
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Pollen monitoring was carried out in Lublin in 2001–2012 by the volumetric method using a Hirst-type spore trap (Lanzoni VPPS 2000). Daily pollen concentrations considerably differed in the particular years. The pollen counts with the biggest variability were observed in the first half of a year when woody plants flowering. The highest annual pollen index were noted for the following taxa: Betula, Urtica, Pinaceae, Poaceae and Alnus. Betula annual total showed the greatest diversity in the study years. The number of days on which the pollen concentration exceeded the threshold values, thereby inducing allergies, was determined for the taxa producing the most allergenic pollen. The above-mentioned taxa primarily included the following: Poaceae, in the case of which the highest number of days with the risk of occurrence of pollen allergy was found (35), Betula (18), and Artemisia (10). The following taxa: Alnus (14 days), Populus (11 days), Fraxinus (10 days), and Quercus (8 days), were also characterized by a large number of days on which their pollen concentrations exceeded the threshold values. The occurrence of periods of high concentration of particular pollen types were also noted. Risk of pollen allergy appeared the earliest at the beginning of February during Alnus and Corylus blooming. High concentrations of other woody plants were recorded from the last ten days of March to about 20 May, and of herbaceous plants from the first/last half of May – beginning of October.
 
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Majkowska-Wojciechowska B, Laskowska B, Wojciechowski Z, Kowalski ML. Występowanie alergii wśród dzieci łódzkich szkół podstawowych: związek z warunkami środowiska domowego i szkolnego. Alergia Astma Immunol. 2000; 5: 115–122 (in Polish).
 
2.
Majkowska-Wojciechowska B, Pełka J, Korzon L, Kozłowska A, Kaczała M, Jarzębska M, Gwardyś T, Kowalski ML. Prevalence of allergy, patterns of allergic sensitization and allergy risk factors in rural and urban children. Allergy 2007; 62: 1044–1050.
 
3.
Kilpelmen M, Terho EO, Helenius H, Koskenvuo M. Farm environment in childhood prevents the development ofallergies. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000; 30: 201–208.
 
4.
Almqvist C, Egmar AC, Hedlin G. Direct and indirect exposure to pets – risk of sensitization and asthma at 4 years in birth cohort. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003; 33: 1190–1197.
 
5.
von Mutius E, Braun-Fahlander C, Schierl R, Riedler J, Ehlermann S, Maisch S, et al. Exposure to endotoxin or other bacterial components might protect against the development of atopy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000; 30: 1230–1234.
 
6.
Fukuda S, Ishikawa H, Koga Y, Aiba Y, Nakashima K, Cheng I., et al. Allergic symptoms and microflora in schoolchildren. J Adolesc Health 2004; 35: 56–58.
 
7.
Marshall JB. European allergy white paper. Allergic diseases as a public health problem in Europe. The UCB Institute of Allergy, 2004.
 
8.
Obtułowicz K, Szczepanek K, Radwan J, Grzywacz M, Adamus K, Szczeklik A. Correlation between airborne pollen incidence, skin prick tests and serum immunoglobulin in allergic people in Cracow, Poland. Grana 1991; 30: 136–141.
 
9.
Myszkowska D, Stępalska D, Obtułowicz K, Porębski G. The relationship between airborne pollen and fungal spore concentrations and seasonal pollen allergy symptoms in Cracow in 1997–1999. Aerobiologia 2002; 18: 153–161.
 
10.
Jäger S. Allergenic significance of Ambrosia (ragweed). In: D’Amato G, Spieksma FThM, Bonini S (eds.). Allergenic pollen and pollinosis in Europe. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford 1991.p.125–127.
 
11.
Galán Soldevilla C, Cariñanos Gonzales P, Alcázar Teno P, Dominguez Vilches E. Spanish Aerobiology Network (REA): Management and quality manual. Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Cordoba, 2007.
 
12.
Thompson PJ, Stewart GA, Samet JM. Allergens and pollution. In: Holgate ST, Church MK, Lichtenstein LM (Eds). Allergy. Mosby International Ltd. 2001.p.213–242.
 
13.
Rapiejko P. Alergeny pyłku roślin. Medical Education, Warszawa 2008 (in Polish).
 
14.
Asher MI, Montefort S, Björkstén B, Lai CKW, Strachan DP, Weiland SK, et al. Worldwide time trends in the prevalence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and eczema in childhood: ISAAC Phases One and Three repeat multicountry cross-sectional surveys. Lancet 2006; 368: 733–743.
 
15.
Samoliński B, Raciborski F, Tomaszewska A, Borowicz J, SamelKowalik P, Walkiewicz P, et al. Częstość występowania alergii w Polsce – program ECAP. Alergoprofil 2007; 3(4): 26–28 (in Polish).
 
16.
Kozłowska A, Majkowska-Wojciechowska B, Kowalski ML. Uczulenia poliwalentne i monowalentne na alergeny pyłku roślin u chorych z alergią. Alergia Astma Immunol. 2007; 12(2): 81–86 (in Polish).
 
17.
Jantunen J, Saarinen K, Rantio-Lehtimäki A. Allergy symptoms in relation to alder and birch pollen concentrations in Finland. Aerobiologia 2012; 28:169–176.
 
18.
Vik H, Florvaag E, Elsayed S. Allergenic significance of Betula (birch) pollen. In: D’Amato G, Spieksma FThM, Bonini S (eds.). Allergenic pollen and pollinosis in Europe. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford 1991.p.36– 44.
 
19.
Taramarcaz P, Lambelet C, Clot B, Keimer C, Hauser C. Ragweed (Ambrosia) progression and it’s health risks: will Switzerland resist this invasion? Swiss Med Wkly. 2005; 135: 538–548.
 
20.
Waisel Y, Eshel A, Keynan N, Langgut D. Ambrosia: A new impending disaster for the Israeli allergic population. Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2008; 10: 856–857.
 
21.
Waisel Y, Mienis Z, Kosman E, Geller-Bernstein C. The partial contribution of specific airborne pollen to pollen induced allergy. Aerobiologia 2004; 20: 197–208.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966