Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) for a patient with a nonfluent/ agrammatic variant of PPA in the mutism stage

Maria Pąchalska 3, 5  
Old Polish University, Kielce, Poland
Department of Health Sciences, The Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
Department of Neuropsychology, The Andrzej Frycz-Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
Department of Electroradiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
Center for Cognition and Communication, New York, USA
Ann Agric Environ Med 2016;23(1):182–192
The paper presents an example of the successful administration of the Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) system. Such an approach is of particular significance in cases of patients with speech and language deterioration, which is observed in a nonfluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (PPA-G). Regaining the ability to communicate with others proves to be very important for the patients’ self-esteem and enables them to restore previously broken social bonds.

Case history:
The patient A.G., aged 73, a right-handed woman, had been a teacher of Polish before suffering from speech disorders of the PPA-G type. As the disease progressed, her communication deteriorated and finally she developed mutism. The patient was given a clinical and imaging-supported diagnosis of an isolated nonfluent/ agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (PPA-G). The Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) system specially designed for her needs was introduced to help the patient to regain the possibility to communicate. After 20 sessions of training with the use of simple equipment she was again able to communicate non-verbally with her son and with the staff of the nursing home. At the same time, a considerable improvements in her social functioning, including daily activities, was observed.

Loss of the ability to communicate with others has a serious impact upon a patient’s quality of life, and often results in withdrawal and an inability to lead an independent life. The introduction of the Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) system proves to be a great help, not only for regaining the ability to communicate, but also for the restoration of social bonds. In consequence, the previously mute patient begins to show signs of social cooperation.


1. Pąchalska M, Kaczmarek BLJ, Kropotov J.D. Neuropsychologia kliniczna. Od teorii do praktyki. Warszawa: PWN. 2014.
2. Kertesz A, Munoz DG, Primary progressive aphasia. Clin Neurosci. 1997; 4(2): 95–102.
3. Kertesz A. Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD). Acta Neuropsychol. 2011; 9(2):103–114.
4. Luzzatti C, Poeck K. An early description of slowly progressive aphasia. Arch Neurol. 1991; 48: 228–229.
5. Mesulam M-M. Slowly progressive aphasia without generalised dementia. Ann Neurol. 1982; 11: 592–598.
6. Mesulam Mesulam MM. Primary progressive aphasia. Ann Neurol. 2001; 49: 425–432.
7. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF, Ogar JM, Rohrer JD, Black S, Boeve BF, Manes F, Dronkers NF, Vandenberghe R, Rascovsky K, Patterson K, Miller BL, Knopman DS, Hodges JR, Mesulam MM, Grossman M. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011 Mar 15; 76(11): 1006–1014.
8. Pick A. Über die Beziehungen der senilen Hirnatrophie zur Aphasie. Prager medicinische Wochenschrift 1892; 17: 165–167.
9. FolsteinFolstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12(3): 189–98.
10. Mc Khan G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the suspicies of Department of Health Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1984; 34: 939.
11. Hachinski VC, Lassen NA, Marshall J. Multi-infarct dementia. A cause of mental deterioration in the elderly. Lancet 1974; 2 (7874): 207–10.
12. Kertesz A. Western Aphasia Battery. New York: Grune and Stratton. 1982.
13. Pąchalska M. Metody diagnozy chorego z afazją. W: T. Gałkowski, G. Jastrzębowska (red.), Logopedia: pytania i odpowiedzi (s. 611–699). T. 2. Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego. 2003.
14. Pąchalska M, MacQueen BD, Brown JW. Microgenetic theory: Brain and mind in time. In: R.W. Rieber (ed.), Encyclopedia of the history of psychological theories (p. 675–708). T. 26. Frankfurt: Springer. 2012.
15. Łuria AR. Podstawy neuropsychologii. Warszawa: PZWL. 1976.
16. Lebrun Y. Mutism. Studies in disorders of communication. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd. 1990.
17. Rohrer JD, Warren JD, Rossor MN. Abnormal laughter-like vocalisations replacing speech in primary progressive aphasia. J Neurol Sci. 2009 Sep 15; 284(1–2): 120–123.
18. Markiewicz K. Możliwości komunikacyjne dzieci autystycznych. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS; 2004.
19. Kaczmarek L. Nasze dziecko uczy się mowy. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Lubelskie; 1988.
20. Jakobson R. Fundamentals of Language, The Hague Mouton & Co., Printers; 1956.
21. Brown JW. Microgenetic Theory and Process Thought. Exeter: Imprint Academic; 2015.
22. Brown JW, Pąchalska M. The symptom and its significance in neuropsychology. Acta Neuropsychol. 2003; 1(1): 1–11.
23. Pribram KH. The holographic hypothesis of brain functioning. In: S. Grof (wyd.), Ancient wisdom, Modern Science (p. 174–175). State University of New York Press; 1984.
24. Pąchalska M, Góral-Półrola J, Brown JW, MacQueen B. Consciousness and reality: a neuropsychological perspective. Acta Neuropsychol. 2015; 13(3): 205–227.
25. Pąchalska M, MacQueen BD, Brown JW. Microgenetic theory: Brain and mind in time. In: RW. Rieber (ed.), Encyclopedia of the history of psychological theories (p. 675–708). Vol. 26. Frankfurt: Springer; 2012a.
26. Otsuki M, Soma Y, Yoshimura N, Tsuji S. Slowly progressive limb-kinetic apraxia. Eur Neurol. 1997; 37: 100–103.
27. Selnes O A, Holcomb H H, Gordon B. Progressive dysarthria: Structural and functional brain correlations. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153: 309–310.
28. Sinnatamby R, Antoun NA, Freer CE, Miles KA, Hodges JR. Neuroradiological findings in primary progressive aphasia: CT MRI and cerebral perfusion SPECT. Neuroradiology 1996; 38: 232–238.
29. Snowden JS, Neary D, Mann DM, Goulding P J, Testa HJ. Progressive language disorder due to lobar atrophy. Ann Neurol. 1992; 31: 174–183.
30. Westbury C, Bub D. Primary progressive aphasia: A review of 112 cases.’ Brain Language 1997; 60, 381–406.
31. Zakzanis KK. The neuropsychological signature of primary progressive aphasia. Brain Language 1999; 70: 70–85.
Copy url