RESEARCH PAPER
Stray dogs and cats as potential sources of soil contamination with zoonotic parasites
1
Department of Biology and Medical Parasitology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
2
Department of Diagnostics and Treatment of Parasitic Diseases and Mycoses, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Corresponding author
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24(1):39-43
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
The main source of many zoonoses is soil contaminated with feline and canine faeces. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of intestinal parasites in stray dogs and cats adopted in Lodz shelter (Poland).
Material and Methods:
In total, 163 faecal samples were collected from 95 dogs and 68 cats from 2011 to 2012. The samples were processed by sedimentation techniques using Mini Parasep®SF.
Results:
Six parasite genera belonging to protozoa, cestoda, and nematoda, were found in dogs, while eight were found in cats. Out of the 163 fecal samples, 37.4% were positive for the presence at least one species of intestinal parasites. The majority of positive dog samples contained eggs from Toxocara and Trichuris genera, and the family Ancylostomatidae, while Toxocara and Taenia eggs, as well as Cystoisospora oocysts, predominated in cat faeces. A significantly higher prevalence of parasites was noted in cats (48.5%) than in dogs (29.5%) (χ2=6.15, P=0.013). The Toxocara genus was the most prevalent parasite in both populations; eggs were found in 27.9% and 16.8% of cats and dogs, respectively. Animals younger than 12 months of age showed higher infection rates with Toxocara, but differences were not statistically significant. The average numbers of Toxocara eggs/gram of faeces in positive puppy and kitten samples were over 5 and 7 times higher than in older dogs and cats, respectively. Mixed infection were found in dogs (5.3%) and cats (8.8%).
Conclusions:
Cat faeces represent a more important potential source of environmental contamination with zoonotic parasites than dog faeces. Among the detected parasites of stray dogs and cats, Toxocara present an important zoonotic risk for the local human population, especially children.
The main source of many zoonoses is soil contaminated with feline and canine faeces. Thus, the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of intestinal parasites in stray dogs and cats adopted in Lodz shelter (Poland).
Material and Methods:
In total, 163 faecal samples were collected from 95 dogs and 68 cats from 2011 to 2012. The samples were processed by sedimentation techniques using Mini Parasep®SF.
Results:
Six parasite genera belonging to protozoa, cestoda, and nematoda, were found in dogs, while eight were found in cats. Out of the 163 fecal samples, 37.4% were positive for the presence at least one species of intestinal parasites. The majority of positive dog samples contained eggs from Toxocara and Trichuris genera, and the family Ancylostomatidae, while Toxocara and Taenia eggs, as well as Cystoisospora oocysts, predominated in cat faeces. A significantly higher prevalence of parasites was noted in cats (48.5%) than in dogs (29.5%) (χ2=6.15, P=0.013). The Toxocara genus was the most prevalent parasite in both populations; eggs were found in 27.9% and 16.8% of cats and dogs, respectively. Animals younger than 12 months of age showed higher infection rates with Toxocara, but differences were not statistically significant. The average numbers of Toxocara eggs/gram of faeces in positive puppy and kitten samples were over 5 and 7 times higher than in older dogs and cats, respectively. Mixed infection were found in dogs (5.3%) and cats (8.8%).
Conclusions:
Cat faeces represent a more important potential source of environmental contamination with zoonotic parasites than dog faeces. Among the detected parasites of stray dogs and cats, Toxocara present an important zoonotic risk for the local human population, especially children.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Hsu Y, Severinghaus L, Serpell J. Dog keeping in Taiwan: Its contribution to the problem of free-roaming dogs. J of Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2003; 6(1): 1–23.
2.
Macpherson CNL. Human behaviour and the epidemiology of parasitic zoonoses. Intl J Parasitol. 2005; 35: 1319–1331.
3.
Dubna S, Langrova I, Napravnik J, Jankovska I, Vadlejch J, Pekar S, Fechtner J. The prevalence of intestinal parasites in dogs from Prague, rural areas, and shelters of the Czech Republic. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 145(1–2): 120–128.
4.
Szabova E, Juris M, Miterpakova M, Antolova D, Papajova I, Sefcikova H. Prevalence of important zoonotic parasites in dog populations from the Slovak Republic. Helminthologia 2007; 44(4): 170–176.
5.
Claerebout E, Casaert S, Dalemans A-C, Wilde DN, Levecke B, Vercruysse J, Geurden T. Giardia and other intestinal parasites in different dog populations in Northern Belgium. Vet Parasitol. 2009; 161: 41–46.
6.
Deplazes P, van Knapen F, Schweiger A, Overgaauw PA. Role of pet dogs and cats in the transmission of helminthic zoonoses in Europe, with a focus on echinococcosis and toxocarosis. Vet Parasitol. 2011; 182(1): 41–53.
7.
Overgaauw PA, van Knapen F. Veterinary and public health aspects of Toxocara spp. Vet Parasitol. 2013; 193(4): 398–403.
8.
Da Silva AM. Human Echinococcosis: A Neglected Disease. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2010; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010....
9.
Beck AM. The Ecology of Stray Dogs: A Study of Free-Ranging Urban Animals. York Press, Baltimore 1973; first ed: 95.
10.
Kłapeć T, Borecka A. Contamination of vegetables, fruits and soil with geohelmints eggs on organic farms in Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(3): 421–425.
11.
Bajor H, Kłapeć T. Contamination of soil with eggs of geohelmints in recreational areas in the Lublin region of Pland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(2): 267–270.
12.
Blaszkowska J, Wojcik A, Kurnatowski P, Szwabe K. Geohelminth egg contamination of children’s play areas in city of Lodz (Poland). Vet Parasitol. 2013; 192: 228–233.
13.
Martinez-Carrasco C, Berriatua E, Garijo M, Martinez J, Alonso FD, de Ybanez RR. Epidemiological study of non-systemic parasitism in dogs in southeast Mediterranean Spain assessed by coprological and post-mortem examination. Zoonoses Public Health. 2007; 54(5): 195–203.
14.
Voslarova E, Passantino A. Stray dog and cat laws and enforcement in Czech Republic and in Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2012; 48(1): 97–104.
15.
Bowman DD. Georgis’ parasitology for veterinarians. 9 th ed. Elsevier Urban &Partner, 2012.
16.
Ładczuk D, Balicka-Ramisz A. Occurrence of parasites in the alimentary canal of cats from Szczecin area, Poland. Ann Parasitol. 2010; 56(3): 235–242.
17.
Barutzki D, Schaper R. Results of Parasitological Examinations of Faecal Samples from Cats and Dogs in Germany between 2003 and 2010. Parasitol Res. 2011; 109: 45–60.
18.
Sowemimo AO. Prevalence and intensity of gastrointestinal parasites of domestic cats in Ode -Irele and Oyo communities, Southwest Nigeria. J Parasitol Vector Biol. 2012; 4(1): 7–13.
19.
Borecka A. Prevalence of intestinal nematodes of dogs in the Warsaw area, Poland. Helminthologia. 2005; 42: 35–39.
20.
Zibaei M, Sadjjadi1 SM, Sarkari B. Prevalence of Toxocara cati and other intestinal helminthes in stray cats in Shiraz, Iran. Trop Biomed. 2007; 24(2): 39–43.
21.
Esmaeilzadeh M, Shamsfard M, Kazemi A, Khalafi SA, Altome SA. Prevalence of Protozoa and Gastrointestinal Helminthesin Stray Cats in Zanjan Province, North-West of Iran. Iranian J Parasitol. 2009; 3(4): 71–75.
22.
Habluetzel A, Traldi G, Ruggieri S, Attili AR, Scuppa P, Marchetti R, Menghini G, Esposito F. An estimation of Toxocara canis prevalence in dogs, environmental egg contamination and risk of human infection in the Marche region of Italy. Vet Parasitol. 2003; 113: 243–252.
23.
Rubel D, Zunino G, Santillan G,Wisnivesky C. Epidemiology of Toxocara canis in the dog population from two areas of different socioeconomic status, greater Buenos Aires, Argentina. Vet Parasitol. 2003; 115: 275–286.
24.
Awoke E, Bogale B, Chanie M. Intestinal Nematode Parasites of Dogs: Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors. Int J Anim Vet Adv. 2011; 3(5): 374–378.
25.
Zewdu E, Semahegn Y, Mekibib B. Prevalence of helminth parasites of dogs and owners awareness about zoonotic parasites in Ambo town, central Ethiopia. Ethiop Vet J. 2010; 14(2): 17–30.
26.
Chen J, Xu M-J, Zhou D-H, Song H-Q, Wang Ch-R, Zhu X-Q. Canine and feline parasitic zoonoses in China. Parasit Vectors. 2012; 5: 152. http://www.parasitesandvectors....
27.
Dalimi A, Sattari A, Motamedi G. A study on intestinal helminthes of dogs, foxes and jackals in the western part of Iran. Vet Parasitol. 2006; 142: 129–133.
28.
Esch KJ, Petersen CA. Transmission and epidemiology of zoonotic protozoal diseases of companion animals. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013; 26(1): 58–85.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
